These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21321618)

  • 1. [Clinical evaluation of gingival composite resin restoring cervical defects in anterior teeth].
    Zhao Q; Xue Sh; Wu Y; Wang Sm
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2011 Feb; 43(1):44-7. PubMed ID: 21321618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Tooth-colored filling materials for the restoration of cervical lesions: a 24-month follow-up study.
    Folwaczny M; Loher C; Mehl A; Kunzelmann KH; Hinkel R
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):251-8. PubMed ID: 11203827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of pattern of failure of resin composite restorations in non-carious cervical lesions with and without occlusal wear facets.
    Oginni AO; Adeleke AA
    J Dent; 2014 Jul; 42(7):824-30. PubMed ID: 24746714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical Performance and Epidemiologic Aspects of Fractured Anterior Teeth Restored with a Composite Resin: A Two-Year Clinical Study.
    Vural UK; Kiremitçi A; Gökalp S
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Jan; 28(1):e204-e209. PubMed ID: 28960769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Three-year evaluation of posterior vertical bite reconstruction using direct resin composite--a case series.
    Schmidlin PR; Filli T; Imfeld C; Tepper S; Attin T
    Oper Dent; 2009; 34(1):102-8. PubMed ID: 19192844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Adhesively restored anterior maxillary dentitions affected by severe erosion: up to 6-year results of a prospective clinical study.
    Vailati F; Gruetter L; Belser UC
    Eur J Esthet Dent; 2013; 8(4):506-30. PubMed ID: 24624375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Direct resin composite restorations versus indirect composite inlays: one-year results.
    Mendonça JS; Neto RG; Santiago SL; Lauris JR; Navarro MF; de Carvalho RM
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 May; 11(3):025-32. PubMed ID: 20461321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. 1-year clinical evaluation of Compoglass and Fuji II LC in cervical erosion/abfraction lesions.
    Brackett WW; Browning WD; Ross JA; Gregory PN; Owens BM
    Am J Dent; 1999 Jun; 12(3):119-22. PubMed ID: 10649933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Noncarious cervical lesions restored with three different tooth-colored materials: two-year results.
    Stojanac IL; Premovic MT; Ramic BD; Drobac MR; Stojsin IM; Petrovic LM
    Oper Dent; 2013; 38(1):12-20. PubMed ID: 22856681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A retrospective clinical study of cervical restorations: longevity and failure-prognostic variables.
    Namgung C; Rho YJ; Jin BH; Lim BS; Cho BH
    Oper Dent; 2013; 38(4):376-85. PubMed ID: 23215544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. One-year clinical performance of a resin-modified glass ionomer and a resin composite restorative material in unprepared Class V restorations.
    Brackett MG; Dib A; Brackett WW; Estrada BE; Reyes AA
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(2):112-6. PubMed ID: 11931132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Survival analysis of composite Dahl restorations provided to manage localised anterior tooth wear (ten year follow-up).
    Gulamali AB; Hemmings KW; Tredwin CJ; Petrie A
    Br Dent J; 2011 Aug; 211(4):E9. PubMed ID: 21869770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. 5-year clinical performance of resin composite versus resin modified glass ionomer restorative system in non-carious cervical lesions.
    Franco EB; Benetti AR; Ishikiriama SK; Santiago SL; Lauris JR; Jorge MF; Navarro MF
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(4):403-8. PubMed ID: 16924979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Two-year clinical performance of Class V resin-modified glass-lonomer and resin composite restorations.
    Brackett WW; Dib A; Brackett MG; Reyes AA; Estrada BE
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(5):477-81. PubMed ID: 14531590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. One-year clinical evaluation of a two-step self-etch adhesive with and without additional enamel etching technique in cervical lesions.
    Ozel E; Say EC; Yurdaguven H; Soyman M
    Aust Dent J; 2010 Jun; 55(2):156-61. PubMed ID: 20604757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Durability of resin composite restorations in high C-factor cavities: a 12-year follow-up.
    van Dijken JW
    J Dent; 2010 Jun; 38(6):469-74. PubMed ID: 20193727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Two-year clinical evaluation of four polyacid-modified resin composites and a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement in Class V lesions.
    Ermiş RB
    Quintessence Int; 2002; 33(7):542-8. PubMed ID: 12165991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. 3-year clinical effectiveness of one-step adhesives in non-carious cervical lesions.
    Moretto SG; Russo EM; Carvalho RC; De Munck J; Van Landuyt K; Peumans M; Van Meerbeek B; Cardoso MV
    J Dent; 2013 Aug; 41(8):675-82. PubMed ID: 23747824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Two-year clinical effectiveness of a resin-modified glass-ionomer adhesive.
    Peumans M; Van Meerbeek B; Lambrechts P; Vanherle G
    Am J Dent; 2003 Dec; 16(6):363-8. PubMed ID: 15002948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical evaluation of an all-in-one adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions with different degrees of dentin sclerosis.
    Ritter AV; Heymann HO; Swift EJ; Sturdevant JR; Wilder AD
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(4):370-8. PubMed ID: 18666493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.