These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

479 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21321624)

  • 21. [Influence of the type of impression material, impression tray and making impression technology on the dimensional accuracy and depth of impression material penetration into "gingival sulcus". In vitro study].
    Riakhovskiĭ AN; Muradov MA
    Stomatologiia (Mosk); 2005; 84(4):57-64. PubMed ID: 16091710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Access to the intracrevicular space in preparations for fixed prosthesis].
    Porzier J; Benner-Jordan L; Bourdeau B; Losfeld R
    Cah Prothese; 1991 Mar; (73):6-20. PubMed ID: 2013007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Cytotoxic effects of gingival retraction cords on human gingival fibroblasts in vitro.
    Liu CM; Huang FM; Yang LC; Chou LS; Chou MY; Chang YC
    J Oral Rehabil; 2004 Apr; 31(4):368-72. PubMed ID: 15089944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The effect of one-step vs. two-step impression techniques on long-term accuracy and dimensional stability when the finish line is within the gingival sulcular area.
    Levartovsky S; Zalis M; Pilo R; Harel N; Ganor Y; Brosh T
    J Prosthodont; 2014 Feb; 23(2):124-33. PubMed ID: 23734561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Gingival retraction techniques for implants versus teeth: current status.
    Bennani V; Schwass D; Chandler N
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2008 Oct; 139(10):1354-63. PubMed ID: 18832271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effect of different retraction and impression techniques on the marginal fit of crowns.
    Wöstmann B; Rehmann P; Trost D; Balkenhol M
    J Dent; 2008 Jul; 36(7):508-12. PubMed ID: 18479801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Cross-sectional study to evaluate variations in attached gingiva and gingival sulcus in the three periods of dentition.
    Srivastava B; Chandra S; Jaiswal JN; Saimbi CS; Srivastava D
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1990; 15(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 2098081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Quality of impressions after use of the Magic FoamCord gingival retraction system--a clinical study of 269 abutment teeth.
    Beier US; Kranewitter R; Dumfahrt H
    Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(2):143-7. PubMed ID: 19418859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Using the double-cord packing technique of tissue retraction for making crown impressions.
    Cloyd S; Puri S
    Dent Today; 1999 Jan; 18(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 10765795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Kinetic study of the liquid uptake of retraction cords].
    Csempesz F; Vág J; Fazekas A
    Fogorv Sz; 2002 Aug; 95(4):159-62. PubMed ID: 12236091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparative evaluation of three gingival displacement materials for efficacy in tissue management and dimensional accuracy.
    Gajbhiye V; Banerjee R; Jaiswal P; Chandak A; Radke U
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2019; 19(2):173-179. PubMed ID: 31040552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of four cordless gingival displacement systems: A clinical study.
    Rayyan MM; Hussien ANM; Sayed NM; Abdallah R; Osman E; El Saad NA; Ramadan S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Feb; 121(2):265-270. PubMed ID: 30722986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparative evaluation of three gingival displacement systems: an in-vivo study.
    Aldhuwayhi S
    Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2023 Sep; 27(17):8019-8025. PubMed ID: 37750631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Correlation of pressure and displacement during gingival displacement: An in vitro study.
    Bennani V; Aarts JM; Schumayer D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Mar; 115(3):296-300. PubMed ID: 26548889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Gingival retraction methods. A literature review].
    Tosches NA; Salvi GE
    Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 2009; 119(2):121-38. PubMed ID: 19306598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Gingival sulcus and retraction techniques. Anatomo-histological aspects].
    Barlattani A
    Dent Cadmos; 1991 Sep; 59(14):56-60, 63-4. PubMed ID: 1778278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Efficacy of two gingival retraction systems on lateral gingival displacement: A prospective clinical study.
    Anupam P; Namratha N; Vibha S; Anandakrishna GN; Shally K; Singh A
    J Oral Biol Craniofac Res; 2013; 3(2):68-72. PubMed ID: 25737887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Dose-related effects of epinephrine on human gingival blood flow and crevicular fluid production used as a soaking solution for chemo-mechanical tissue retraction.
    Csillag M; Nyiri G; Vag J; Fazekas A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Jan; 97(1):6-11. PubMed ID: 17280885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Performance of fast-setting impression materials in the reproduction of subgingival tooth surfaces without soft tissue retraction.
    Rudolph H; Röhl A; Walter MH; Luthardt RG; Quaas S
    Int J Prosthodont; 2014; 27(4):366-75. PubMed ID: 25010882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Application of animal models in gingival retraction experimental curriculum].
    Cai H; Yang SY; Zeng YX; Qin H; Hu SS; Wang J
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2016 Feb; 25(1):117-20. PubMed ID: 27063323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 24.