These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2132209)

  • 1. In vivo fractures of endodontically treated posterior teeth restored with amalgam.
    Hansen EK; Asmussen E; Christiansen NC
    Endod Dent Traumatol; 1990 Apr; 6(2):49-55. PubMed ID: 2132209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cusp fracture of endodontically treated posterior teeth restored with amalgam. Teeth restored in Denmark before 1975 versus after 1979.
    Hansen EK; Asmussen E
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1993 Apr; 51(2):73-7. PubMed ID: 8498164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In vivo fractures of endodontically treated posterior teeth restored with enamel-bonded resin.
    Hansen EK; Asmussen E
    Endod Dent Traumatol; 1990 Oct; 6(5):218-25. PubMed ID: 2133313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored with CAD/CAM ceramic inlays.
    Hannig C; Westphal C; Becker K; Attin T
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Oct; 94(4):342-9. PubMed ID: 16198171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Strain measurements and fracture resistance of endodontically treated premolars restored with all-ceramic restorations.
    Seow LL; Toh CG; Wilson NH
    J Dent; 2015 Jan; 43(1):126-32. PubMed ID: 25448436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of amalgam bonding on the stiffness of teeth weakened by cavity preparation.
    Zidan O; Abdel-Keriem U
    Dent Mater; 2003 Nov; 19(7):680-5. PubMed ID: 12901995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cuspal deflection of maxillary premolars restored with bonded amalgam.
    el-Badrawy WA
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(6):337-43. PubMed ID: 10823082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fracture strength and fracture patterns of maxillary premolars with approximal slot cavities.
    el-Mowafy OM
    Oper Dent; 1993; 18(4):160-6. PubMed ID: 8152985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of different restoration techniques on the fracture resistance of endodontically-treated molars.
    Cobankara FK; Unlu N; Cetin AR; Ozkan HB
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(5):526-33. PubMed ID: 18833859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of coronal restorations on the fracture resistance of root canal-treated premolar and molar teeth: a retrospective study.
    Dammaschke T; Nykiel K; Sagheri D; Schäfer E
    Aust Endod J; 2013 Aug; 39(2):48-56. PubMed ID: 23890259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. In vivo cusp fracture of endodontically treated premolars restored with MOD amalgam or MOD resin fillings.
    Hansen EK
    Dent Mater; 1988 Aug; 4(4):169-73. PubMed ID: 3251803
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cuspal reinforcement in endodontically treated molars.
    Uyehara MY; Davis RD; Overton JD
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(6):364-70. PubMed ID: 10823086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessment of the resistance to fracture of endodontically treated molars restored with amalgam.
    Assif D; Nissan J; Gafni Y; Gordon M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 May; 89(5):462-5. PubMed ID: 12806323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. In vitro fracture strength of endodontically treated premolars.
    Steele A; Johnson BR
    J Endod; 1999 Jan; 25(1):6-8. PubMed ID: 10196835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fracture strength of weakened human premolars restored with amalgam with and without cusp coverage.
    Mondelli RF; Barbosa WF; Mondelli J; Franco EB; Carvalho RM
    Am J Dent; 1998 Aug; 11(4):181-4. PubMed ID: 10388373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prognosis of Indirect Composite Resin Cuspal Coverage on Endodontically Treated Premolars and Molars: An In Vivo Prospective Study.
    Dias MCR; Martins JNR; Chen A; Quaresma SA; Luís H; Caramês J
    J Prosthodont; 2018 Aug; 27(7):598-604. PubMed ID: 27662604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fracture strength and fracture patterns of root filled teeth restored with direct resin restorations.
    Taha NA; Palamara JE; Messer HH
    J Dent; 2011 Aug; 39(8):527-35. PubMed ID: 21620926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Resistance and retention as critical factors in silver amalgam restoration of endodontic posterior teeth. A clinical focus].
    del Nero Viera G; Miñana Laliga R; Garrido Martínez M; Ramos Navarro JM
    Av Odontoestomatol; 1990 May; 6(5):237-59. PubMed ID: 2222645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of endodontic treatment, post insertion, and ceramic restoration on the fracture resistance of maxillary premolars.
    Bitter K; Meyer-Lueckel H; Fotiadis N; Blunck U; Neumann K; Kielbassa AM; Paris S
    Int Endod J; 2010 Jun; 43(6):469-77. PubMed ID: 20536574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of restorative technique on the biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated maxillary premolars. Part I: fracture resistance and fracture mode.
    Soares PV; Santos-Filho PC; Martins LR; Soares CJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Jan; 99(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 18182183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.