365 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21323142)
1. Predicted and experienced affective responses to the outcome of the 2008 U.S. presidential election.
Kitchens MB; Corser GC; Gohm CL; VonWaldner KL; Foreman EL
Psychol Rep; 2010 Dec; 107(3):837-46. PubMed ID: 21323142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Smearing the opposition: implicit and explicit stigmatization of the 2008 U.S. Presidential candidates and the current U.S. President.
Kosloff S; Greenberg J; Schmader T; Dechesne M; Weise D
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2010 Aug; 139(3):383-98. PubMed ID: 20677891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy and artifact: reexamining the intensity bias in affective forecasting.
Levine LJ; Lench HC; Kaplan RL; Safer MA
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2012 Oct; 103(4):584-605. PubMed ID: 22889075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Age differences in affective forecasting accuracy.
Barber SJ; Kausar H; Udry J
Psychol Aging; 2023 Aug; 38(5):357-373. PubMed ID: 36701521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Age differences in affective forecasting and experienced emotion surrounding the 2008 US presidential election.
Scheibe S; Mata R; Carstensen LL
Cogn Emot; 2011 Sep; 25(6):1029-44. PubMed ID: 21547760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Changes in subjective well-being following the U.S. Presidential election of 2016.
Lench HC; Levine LJ; Perez KA; Carpenter ZK; Carlson SJ; Tibbett T
Emotion; 2019 Feb; 19(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 29494200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. When and why people misestimate future feelings: Identifying strengths and weaknesses in affective forecasting.
Lench HC; Levine LJ; Perez K; Carpenter ZK; Carlson SJ; Bench SW; Wan Y
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2019 May; 116(5):724-742. PubMed ID: 30604985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Stressful politics: voters' cortisol responses to the outcome of the 2008 United States Presidential election.
Stanton SJ; Labar KS; Saini EK; Kuhn CM; Beehner JC
Psychoneuroendocrinology; 2010 Jun; 35(5):768-74. PubMed ID: 19962831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mortality Salience, System Justification, and Candidate Evaluations in the 2012 U.S. Presidential Election.
Sterling J; Jost JT; Shrout PE
PLoS One; 2016; 11(3):e0150556. PubMed ID: 26982197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Forgetting feelings: Opposite biases in reports of the intensity of past emotion and mood.
Kaplan RL; Levine LJ; Lench HC; Safer MA
Emotion; 2016 Apr; 16(3):309-19. PubMed ID: 26501929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Remembering Election Night 2016: Subjective but not objective metrics of autobiographical memory vary with political affiliation, affective valence, and surprise.
Chiew KS; Harris BB; Adcock RA
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2022 Feb; 151(2):390-409. PubMed ID: 35286121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Did Hurricane Sandy influence the 2012 US presidential election?
Hart J
Soc Sci Res; 2014 Jul; 46():1-8. PubMed ID: 24767585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Voter emotional responses and voting behaviour in the 2020 US presidential election.
Lench HC; Fernandez L; Reed N; Raibley E; Levine LJ; Salsedo K
Cogn Emot; 2024 May; ():1-14. PubMed ID: 38764190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Positive emotions and the social broadening effects of Barack Obama.
Ong AD; Burrow AL; Fuller-Rowell TE
Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol; 2012 Oct; 18(4):424-8. PubMed ID: 22905966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Younger and older adults' memory of past feelings surrounding an election.
Devarayapuram Ramakrishnan S; Kausar H; Barber SJ
Memory; 2024; 32(1):11-24. PubMed ID: 37930779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. When the tables are turned: The effects of the 2016 U.S. Presidential election on in-group favoritism and out-group hostility.
Oc B; Moore C; Bashshur MR
PLoS One; 2018; 13(5):e0197848. PubMed ID: 29795642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. U.S. election. McCain, Obama present their wars on cancer.
Couzin J
Science; 2008 Sep; 321(5895):1432. PubMed ID: 18787141
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Neural bases of motivated reasoning: an FMRI study of emotional constraints on partisan political judgment in the 2004 U.S. Presidential election.
Westen D; Blagov PS; Harenski K; Kilts C; Hamann S
J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Nov; 18(11):1947-58. PubMed ID: 17069484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Racial attitudes and visual cues in political judgments: support for Obama during the 2008 presidential election.
West TV; Pearson AR; Dovidio JF; Johnson BT; Phills CE
Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol; 2014 Oct; 20(4):583-90. PubMed ID: 25090140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. How an election loss leads to a social movement: Reactions to the 2016 U.S. presidential election among liberals predict later collective action and social movement identification.
Bilali R; Godfrey EB; Freel SH
Br J Soc Psychol; 2020 Jan; 59(1):227-247. PubMed ID: 31894871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
