These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

57 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2132326)

  • 1. [Experimental study of growth and development of the dentofacial complex in the rat. Influence of anterior displacement of mandible].
    Ohmura K
    Ou Daigaku Shigakushi; 1990 Nov; 17(3):332-53. PubMed ID: 2132326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Experimental study of the influence of removal of the zygomatic arch on craniofacial growth and development].
    Umemura S
    Shikwa Gakuho; 1989 May; 89(5):981-1019. PubMed ID: 2635384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of masticatory muscle function and bite-raising on mandibular morphology in the growing rat.
    Bresin A
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 2001; (150):1-49. PubMed ID: 11803646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Orthodontic implications of protein undernutrition in mandibular growth. A cephalometric study in growing rats.
    Garat JA; Martín AE; Pani M; Holgado NR; Meheris HE; González S
    Acta Odontol Latinoam; 2007; 20(2):73-8. PubMed ID: 18590254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of extraoral lateral force loading on the mandible in the mandibular development of growing rats.
    Ishii T; Yamaguchi H
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Dec; 134(6):782-91. PubMed ID: 19061805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dentoskeletal effects of a removable appliance for expansion of the maxillary arch: a postero-anterior cephalometric study.
    Defraia E; Marinelli A; Baroni G; Tollaro I
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Feb; 30(1):57-60. PubMed ID: 17971351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of the reciprocal mini-chin cup appliance.
    Aslan BI; Dinçer M
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Feb; 30(1):80-8. PubMed ID: 18276929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Dental occlusion and maxillofacial changes after correction of early crossbite with FR-III].
    Shao JP; Bai XQ; Liu J; Guo X
    Di Yi Jun Yi Da Xue Xue Bao; 2004 Apr; 24(4):464-6. PubMed ID: 15090327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of activator and high-pull headgear combination therapy: skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft tissue profile changes.
    Marşan G
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):140-8. PubMed ID: 17488997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Juvenile chronic arthritis. Dentofacial morphology, growth, mandibular function and orthodontic treatment.
    Kjellberg H
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1995; 109():1-56. PubMed ID: 7660317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cephalometric changes during self-correction of primary anterior crossbite.
    Nakamura S; Miyajima K; Nagahara K; Killiany DM; Tsuchiya T
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1999; 66(3):175-9, 154. PubMed ID: 10476355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Treatment of Class III problems begins with differential diagnosis of anterior crossbites.
    Ngan P; Hu AM; Fields HW
    Pediatr Dent; 1997; 19(6):386-95. PubMed ID: 9348603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Components of anterior crossbite in the primary dentition.
    Tsai HH
    ASDC J Dent Child; 2001; 68(1):27-32, 10. PubMed ID: 11324403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Morphological study on growth process of primary dentition having distal step of the terminal plane. 1. Growth on the average].
    Inuzuka K
    Aichi Gakuin Daigaku Shigakkai Shi; 1990 Sep; 28(3):803-27. PubMed ID: 2135139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of growth impairment and orthodontic results in adult patients with clefts of palate and unilateral clefts of lip, palate and alveolus.
    Schultes G; Gaggl A; Kärcher H
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2000 Feb; 38(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 10783444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Evaluation on facial pattern of early childhood patients with T.M.J. dysfunction occurred after anterior crossbite correction].
    Fukazawa H; Mukaiyama T; Kurita T; Urano J; Mitani H
    Nihon Ago Kansetsu Gakkai Zasshi; 1989; 1(1):66-78. PubMed ID: 2489194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Treatment effects of the mandibular anterior repositioning appliance on patients with Class II malocclusion.
    Pangrazio-Kulbersh V; Berger JL; Chermak DS; Kaczynski R; Simon ES; Haerian A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Mar; 123(3):286-95. PubMed ID: 12637901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of the modified maxillary protractor applied to Class III malocclusion with retruded maxilla in early mixed dentition.
    Kajiyama K; Murakami T; Suzuki A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Nov; 118(5):549-59. PubMed ID: 11094369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Treatment timing for Twin-block therapy.
    Baccetti T; Franchi L; Toth LR; McNamara JA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Aug; 118(2):159-70. PubMed ID: 10935956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Posttreatment changes after successful correction of Class II malocclusions with the twin block appliance.
    Mills CM; McCulloch KJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Jul; 118(1):24-33. PubMed ID: 10893470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.