These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21323948)
1. Handling of radical prostatectomy specimens: total or partial embedding? Vainer B; Toft BG; Olsen KE; Jacobsen GK; Marcussen N Histopathology; 2011 Jan; 58(2):211-6. PubMed ID: 21323948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. International society of urological pathology consensus conference on handling and staging of radical prostatectomy specimens. Egevad L; Srigley JR; Delahunt B Adv Anat Pathol; 2011 Jul; 18(4):301-5. PubMed ID: 21654361 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Handling of radical prostatectomy specimens: total or partial embedding? Egevad L Histopathology; 2011 Nov; 59(5):1011-2; author reply 1012-3. PubMed ID: 21973263 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Handling of radical prostatectomy specimens: total embedding with whole mounts, with special reference to the Ancona experience. Montironi R; Lopez-Beltran A; Scarpelli M; Mazzucchelli R; Cheng L Histopathology; 2011 Nov; 59(5):1006-10; author reply 1010-1. PubMed ID: 21880057 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Histopathology sampling of radical prostatectomy specimens: representative or entire submission? Bell KB; Kida M; Cooper K Histopathology; 2011 Nov; 59(5):1013-4; author reply 1014. PubMed ID: 22092414 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Complete embedding and close step-sectioning of radical prostatectomy specimens both increase detection of extra-prostatic extension, and correlate with increased disease-free survival by stage of prostate cancer patients. Desai A; Wu H; Sun L; Sesterhenn IA; Mostofi FK; McLeod D; Amling C; Kusuda L; Lance R; Herring J; Foley J; Baldwin D; Bishoff JT; Soderdahl D; Moul JW Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2002; 5(3):212-8. PubMed ID: 12496984 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy. Smith JA; Chan RC; Chang SS; Herrell SD; Clark PE; Baumgartner R; Cookson MS J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90. PubMed ID: 17936849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Radical prostatectomy specimens among Medicare patients in New York State: a review of pathologists' reports. Imperato PJ; Waisman J; Nenner RP Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1998 Nov; 122(11):966-71. PubMed ID: 9822124 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment of the circumferential margins, extraprostatic extension and Gleason score in radical prostatectomy specimens: Comparison of a partial embedding method with supplemental total inclusion of peripheral tissues. Fadul LC; da Silva MT; de Freitas LA; Athanazio DA Pathol Res Pract; 2016 Mar; 212(3):217-21. PubMed ID: 26774290 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of radical prostatectomy specimens and diagnostic reporting of pathological findings. Montironi R; Lopez-Beltran A; Mazzucchelli R; Scarpelli M; Bollito E Pathologica; 2001 Jun; 93(3):226-32. PubMed ID: 11433618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Key issues in handling and reporting radical prostatectomy specimens. Srigley JR Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2006 Mar; 130(3):303-17. PubMed ID: 16519557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Whole mounted radical prostatectomy specimens do not increase detection of adverse pathological features. Hollenbeck BK; Bassily N; Wei JT; Montie JE; Hayasaka S; Taylor JM; Rubin MA J Urol; 2000 Nov; 164(5):1583-6. PubMed ID: 11025709 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prognostic significance of tumor volume in radical prostatectomy and needle biopsy specimens. Epstein JI J Urol; 2011 Sep; 186(3):790-7. PubMed ID: 21788055 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Immediate radical prostatectomy in patients with atypical small acinar proliferation. Over treatment? Brausi M; Castagnetti G; Dotti A; De Luca G; Olmi R; Cesinaro AM J Urol; 2004 Sep; 172(3):906-8; discussion 908-9. PubMed ID: 15310995 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The prognostic role of the pathological T2 subclassification for prostate cancer in the 2002 Tumour-Nodes-Metastasis staging system. van Oort IM; Witjes JA; Kok DE; Kiemeney LA; Hulsbergen-Van De Kaa CA BJU Int; 2008 Aug; 102(4):438-41. PubMed ID: 18336608 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prostate specimen reevaluation in patients with organ confined prostate cancer and postoperative biological recurrence. Ravery V; De la Taille A; Toublanc M; Boccon-Gibod L; Hermieu JF; Delmas V; Boccon-Gibod L J Urol; 1996 Jun; 155(6):1981-2. PubMed ID: 8618302 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Relationship between systematic biopsies and histological features of 222 radical prostatectomy specimens: lack of prediction of tumor significance for men with nonpalpable prostate cancer. Noguchi M; Stamey TA; McNeal JE; Yemoto CM J Urol; 2001 Jul; 166(1):104-9; discussion 109-10. PubMed ID: 11435833 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Invasion of fat justifies assignment of stage pT3a in prostatic adenocarcinoma. Sung MT; Eble JN; Cheng L Pathology; 2006 Aug; 38(4):309-11. PubMed ID: 16916718 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Detection of cancer in radical prostatectomy specimens with no residual carcinoma in the initial review of slides. Duffield AS; Epstein JI Am J Surg Pathol; 2009 Jan; 33(1):120-5. PubMed ID: 18971774 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of digital rectal examination and biopsy results with the radical prostatectomy specimen. Obek C; Louis P; Civantos F; Soloway MS J Urol; 1999 Feb; 161(2):494-8; discussion 498-9. PubMed ID: 9915434 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]