BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

301 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21323962)

  • 1. HER2 status in gastro-oesophageal adenocarcinomas assessed by two rabbit monoclonal antibodies (SP3 and 4B5) and two in situ hybridization methods (FISH and SISH).
    Boers JE; Meeuwissen H; Methorst N
    Histopathology; 2011 Feb; 58(3):383-94. PubMed ID: 21323962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Early HER2 dysregulation in gastric and oesophageal carcinogenesis.
    Fassan M; Mastracci L; Grillo F; Zagonel V; Bruno S; Battaglia G; Pitto F; Nitti D; Celiento T; Zaninotto G; Fiocca R; Rugge M
    Histopathology; 2012 Nov; 61(5):769-76. PubMed ID: 22882541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. HER2 in gastric cancer: comparative analysis of three different antibodies using whole-tissue sections and tissue microarrays.
    Abrahão-Machado LF; Jácome AA; Wohnrath DR; dos Santos JS; Carneseca EC; Fregnani JH; Scapulatempo-Neto C
    World J Gastroenterol; 2013 Oct; 19(38):6438-46. PubMed ID: 24151362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. HER2 status in gastric/gastro-oesophageal junctional cancers: should determination of gene amplification by SISH use HER2 copy number or HER2: CEP17 ratio?
    Kumarasinghe MP; de Boer WB; Khor TS; Ooi EM; Jene N; Jayasinghe S; Fox SB
    Pathology; 2014 Apr; 46(3):184-7. PubMed ID: 24614718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comprehensive analysis of HER2 expression and gene amplification in gastric cancers using immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization: which scoring system should we use?
    Park YS; Hwang HS; Park HJ; Ryu MH; Chang HM; Yook JH; Kim BS; Jang SJ; Kang YK
    Hum Pathol; 2012 Mar; 43(3):413-22. PubMed ID: 21855114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. HER2 status in gastric cancer: a comparison of two novel in situ hybridization methods (IQ FISH and dual color SISH) and two immunohistochemistry methods (A0485 and HercepTest™).
    Pala EE; Bayol U; Ozguzer A; Akman O
    Pathol Res Pract; 2013 Sep; 209(9):548-54. PubMed ID: 23910175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. HER2 status in gastroesophageal cancer: a tissue microarray study of 1040 cases.
    Cappellesso R; Fassan M; Hanspeter E; Bornschein J; d'Amore ES; Cuorvo LV; Mazzoleni G; Barbareschi M; Pizzi M; Guzzardo V; Malfertheiner P; Micev M; Guido M; Giacomelli L; Tsukanov VV; Zagonel V; Nitti D; Rugge M
    Hum Pathol; 2015 May; 46(5):665-72. PubMed ID: 25800719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. EGFR gene amplification is relatively common and associates with outcome in intestinal adenocarcinoma of the stomach, gastro-oesophageal junction and distal oesophagus.
    Birkman EM; Ålgars A; Lintunen M; Ristamäki R; Sundström J; Carpén O
    BMC Cancer; 2016 Jul; 16():406. PubMed ID: 27387915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The significance of the HER-2 status in esophageal adenocarcinoma for survival: an immunohistochemical and an in situ hybridization study.
    Prins MJ; Ruurda JP; van Diest PJ; van Hillegersberg R; Ten Kate FJ
    Ann Oncol; 2013 May; 24(5):1290-7. PubMed ID: 23334118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. HER2 amplification in gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma: correlation of two antibodies using gastric cancer scoring criteria, H score, and digital image analysis with fluorescence in situ hybridization.
    Radu OM; Foxwell T; Cieply K; Navina S; Dacic S; Nason KS; Davison JM
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2012 Apr; 137(4):583-94. PubMed ID: 22431535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of HER2 status between surgically resected specimens and matched biopsy specimens of gastric intestinal-type adenocarcinoma.
    Yoshida H; Yamamoto N; Taniguchi H; Oda I; Katai H; Kushima R; Tsuda H
    Virchows Arch; 2014 Aug; 465(2):145-54. PubMed ID: 24889042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of four immunohistochemical tests and FISH for measuring HER2 expression in gastric carcinomas.
    Cho EY; Srivastava A; Park K; Kim J; Lee MH; Do I; Lee J; Kim KM; Sohn TS; Kang WK; Kim S
    Pathology; 2012 Apr; 44(3):216-20. PubMed ID: 22437741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Analytical validation of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 immunohistochemistry by the use of the A0485 antibody versus the 4B5 antibody and breast versus gastric scoring guidelines in ovarian clear cell carcinoma.
    Lin SY; Wang YH; Hsu CY; Chen YJ; Lai CR; Hang JF
    Histopathology; 2021 Nov; 79(5):758-767. PubMed ID: 34036622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in gastroesophageal cancer: correlation between immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization.
    Tafe LJ; Janjigian YY; Zaidinski M; Hedvat CV; Hameed MR; Tang LH; Hicks JB; Shah MA; Barbashina V
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2011 Nov; 135(11):1460-5. PubMed ID: 22032573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Breast cancer HER2 equivocal cases: is there an alternative to FISH testing? A pilot study using two different antibodies sequentially.
    Yosepovich A; Avivi C; Bar J; Polak-Charcon S; Mardoukh C; Barshack I
    Isr Med Assoc J; 2010 Jun; 12(6):353-6. PubMed ID: 20928989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in gastric carcinoma: issues related to heterogeneity in biopsies and resections.
    Lee S; de Boer WB; Fermoyle S; Platten M; Kumarasinghe MP
    Histopathology; 2011 Nov; 59(5):832-40. PubMed ID: 22092394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. False positivity in HER2 testing of breast cancer: novel paths for approaching an old dilemma.
    Nunes CB; Rocha RM; Buzelin MA; Balabram D; de Souza Foureaux F; Porto SS; Gobbi H
    J Clin Pathol; 2013 Nov; 66(11):946-50. PubMed ID: 23867547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. HER2 immunohistochemistry in endometrial and ovarian clear cell carcinoma: discordance between antibodies and with in-situ hybridisation.
    Koopman T; van der Vegt B; Dijkstra M; Bart J; Duiker E; Wisman GBA; de Bock GH; Hollema H
    Histopathology; 2018 Nov; 73(5):852-863. PubMed ID: 29989198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of the HER2 amplification status in oesophageal adenocarcinoma by conventional and automated FISH: a tissue microarray study.
    Prins MJ; Ruurda JP; van Diest PJ; van Hillegersberg R; ten Kate FJ
    J Clin Pathol; 2014 Jan; 67(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 24043715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of immunohistochemistry, four in situ hybridization methods and quantitative polymerase chain reaction for the molecular diagnosis of HER2 status in gastric cancer: a study of 55 cases.
    Staněk L; Rozkoš T; Laco J; Ryška A; Petruželka L; Důra M; Dundr P
    Mol Med Rep; 2014 Nov; 10(5):2669-74. PubMed ID: 25189406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.