These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21323984)

  • 1. Determination of vertical dimension of occlusion in dentate patients by cephalometric analysis--pilot study.
    Tavano KT; Seraidarian PI; de Oliveira DD; Jansen WC
    Gerodontology; 2012 Jun; 29(2):e297-305. PubMed ID: 21323984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Is it possible to use cross-sectional and vertical facial measurements to establish the shape of the mandibular arch?
    El Haje OA; Pompeo DD; Furtado GC; Rivera LM; Paranhos LR
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2014 Nov; 15(6):735-9. PubMed ID: 25825099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Nevoid Basal cell carcinoma syndrome: a cephalometric study of patients and controls.
    Leonardi R; Licciardello V; Santarelli A; Ciavarella D; Bolouri S; Härle F; Caltabiano M; Lo Muzio L
    J Craniofac Surg; 2009 Jan; 20(1):203-8. PubMed ID: 19165028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Craniofacial morphological characteristics of Chinese adults with normal occlusion and different skeletal divergence.
    Xiao D; Gao H; Ren Y
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Apr; 33(2):198-204. PubMed ID: 20841315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Facial height in Japanese-Brazilian descendants with normal occlusion.
    Vieira FP; Pinzan A; Janson G; Fernandes TM; Sathler RC; Henriques RP
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(5):54-66. PubMed ID: 25715717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. McNamara norms for Turkish adolescents with balanced faces and normal occlusion.
    Kilic N; Catal G; Oktay H
    Aust Orthod J; 2010 May; 26(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 20575197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The reliability and variability of SN and PFH reference planes in cephalometric diagnosis and therapeutic planning of dentomaxillofacial malformations.
    Incisivo V; Silvestri A
    J Craniofac Surg; 2000 Jan; 11(1):31-8. PubMed ID: 11314097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Intraexaminer and interexaminer reliabilities of landmark identification on digitized lateral cephalograms and formatted 3-dimensional cone-beam computerized tomography images.
    Lagravère MO; Low C; Flores-Mir C; Chung R; Carey JP; Heo G; Major PW
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 May; 137(5):598-604. PubMed ID: 20451778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Establishment of South Indian soft tissue cephalometric norms using profile angles and esthetic analysis.
    Biradar AK; Madanagowda SB
    World J Orthod; 2010; 11(4):e104-13. PubMed ID: 21490979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cephalometric superimpositions.
    Gu Y; McNamara JA
    Angle Orthod; 2008 Nov; 78(6):967-76. PubMed ID: 18947269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An ultrasonographic evaluation of masseter muscle thickness in different dentofacial patterns.
    Rohila AK; Sharma VP; Shrivastav PK; Nagar A; Singh GP
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(6):726-31. PubMed ID: 23649053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Compensation for vertical dysplasia and its clinical application.
    Anwar N; Fida M
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Oct; 31(5):516-22. PubMed ID: 19679646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Determining the sagittal relationship between the maxilla and the mandible: a cephalometric analysis to clear up the confusion.
    Davis GS; Cannon JL; Messersmith ML
    J Tenn Dent Assoc; 2013; 93(1):22-8; quiz 29-30. PubMed ID: 23909085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Relationship between dental arch width and vertical facial morphology in untreated adults.
    Forster CM; Sunga E; Chung CH
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Jun; 30(3):288-94. PubMed ID: 18263889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An investigation of mandibular morphology in subjects with different vertical facial growth patterns.
    Eröz UB; Ceylan I; Aydemir S
    Aust Orthod J; 2000 Mar; 16(1):16-22. PubMed ID: 11201956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Chin development as a result of differential jaw growth.
    Marshall SD; Low LE; Holton NE; Franciscus RG; Frazier M; Qian F; Mann K; Schneider G; Scott JE; Southard TE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Apr; 139(4):456-64. PubMed ID: 21457856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Electromyographic activity of masseter and temporal muscles with different facial types.
    Vianna-Lara MS; Caria PH; Tosello Dde O; Lara F; Amorim MM
    Angle Orthod; 2009 May; 79(3):515-20. PubMed ID: 19413373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Craniofacial structure of Anatolian Turkish adults with normal occlusions and well-balanced faces.
    Basciftci FA; Uysal T; Buyukerkmen A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Mar; 125(3):366-72. PubMed ID: 15014417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Craniofacial profile in Southern Chinese with hypodontia.
    Chan DW; Samman N; McMillan AS
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Jun; 31(3):300-5. PubMed ID: 19193707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cephalometric norms for Bunt and Brahmin children of Dakshina Kannada based on McNamara's analysis.
    Bhat M; Sudha P; Tandon S
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2001 Jun; 19(2):41-51. PubMed ID: 11692821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.