These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
350 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21324143)
1. Treatment of uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: a randomized multicenter trial comparing sacrospinous fixation with vaginal hysterectomy (SAVE U trial). Detollenaere RJ; den Boon J; Stekelenburg J; Alhafidh AH; Hakvoort RA; Vierhout ME; van Eijndhoven HW BMC Womens Health; 2011 Feb; 11():4. PubMed ID: 21324143 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Hysteropexy in the treatment of uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: a multicenter randomized controlled non-inferiority trial comparing laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy with vaginal sacrospinous hysteropexy (LAVA-trial, study protocol). van IJsselmuiden MN; Coolen AL; Detollenaere RJ; den Boon J; Bongers M; van de Pol G; Vollebregt A; Radder CM; Deprest J; van Eijndhoven HW BMC Womens Health; 2014 Sep; 14():112. PubMed ID: 25231240 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Impact of Sacrospinous Hysteropexy and Vaginal Hysterectomy With Suspension of the Uterosacral Ligaments on Sexual Function in Women With Uterine Prolapse: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Comparative Study. Detollenaere RJ; Kreuwel IA; Dijkstra JR; Kluivers KB; van Eijndhoven HW J Sex Med; 2016 Feb; 13(2):213-9. PubMed ID: 26805940 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: observational follow-up of a multicentre randomised trial. Schulten SFM; Detollenaere RJ; Stekelenburg J; IntHout J; Kluivers KB; van Eijndhoven HWF BMJ; 2019 Sep; 366():l5149. PubMed ID: 31506252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: multicentre randomised non-inferiority trial. Detollenaere RJ; den Boon J; Stekelenburg J; IntHout J; Vierhout ME; Kluivers KB; van Eijndhoven HW BMJ; 2015 Jul; 351():h3717. PubMed ID: 26206451 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy versus vaginal sacrospinous fixation for vaginal vault prolapse, a randomized controlled trial: SALTO-2 trial, study protocol. Coolen AWM; van IJsselmuiden MN; van Oudheusden AMJ; Veen J; van Eijndhoven HWF; Mol BWJ; Roovers JP; Bongers MY BMC Womens Health; 2017 Jul; 17(1):52. PubMed ID: 28747206 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of two vaginal, uterus sparing operations for pelvic organ prolapse: modified Manchester operation (MM) and sacrospinous hysteropexy (SSH), a study protocol for a multicentre randomized non-inferiority trial (the SAM study). Schulten SFM; Enklaar RA; Kluivers KB; van Leijsen SAL; Jansen-van der Weide MC; Adang EMM; van Bavel J; van Dongen H; Gerritse MBE; van Gestel I; Malmberg GGA; Mouw RJC; van Rumpt-van de Geest DA; Spaans WA; van der Steen A; Stekelenburg J; Tiersma ESM; Verkleij-Hagoort AC; Vollebregt A; Wingen CBM; Weemhoff M; van Eijndhoven HWF BMC Womens Health; 2019 Apr; 19(1):49. PubMed ID: 30940171 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Surgical interventions for uterine prolapse and for vault prolapse: the two VUE RCTs. Hemming C; Constable L; Goulao B; Kilonzo M; Boyers D; Elders A; Cooper K; Smith A; Freeman R; Breeman S; McDonald A; Hagen S; Montgomery I; Norrie J; Glazener C Health Technol Assess; 2020 Mar; 24(13):1-220. PubMed ID: 32138809 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Comparison outcomes of three surgical procedures in treatment of severe pelvic organ prolapse and analysis of risk factors for genital prolapse recurrence]. Hu CD; Chen YS; Yi XF; Ding JX; Feng WW; Yao LQ; Huang J; Zhang Y; Hu WG; Zhu ZL; Hua KQ Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Feb; 46(2):94-100. PubMed ID: 21426765 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of sacrospinous hysteropexy with graft vs vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension on treatment failure in women with uterovaginal prolapse: 5-year results of a randomized clinical trial. Nager CW; Visco AG; Richter HE; Rardin CR; Komesu Y; Harvie HS; Zyczynski HM; Paraiso MFR; Mazloomdoost D; Sridhar A; Thomas S; Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Aug; 225(2):153.e1-153.e31. PubMed ID: 33716071 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. McCall Culdoplasty vs. Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation after vaginal hysterectomy: comparison of postoperative vaginal length and sexual function in postmenopausal women. Kokanalı MK; Cavkaytar S; Aksakal O; Doğanay M Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 Nov; 194():218-22. PubMed ID: 26448134 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse recurrence after sacrospinous hysteropexy or vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension. Schulten SF; Detollenaere RJ; IntHout J; Kluivers KB; Van Eijndhoven HW Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Aug; 227(2):252.e1-252.e9. PubMed ID: 35439530 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of Uterosacral Ligament Suspension vs Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation With or Without Perioperative Behavioral Therapy for Pelvic Organ Vaginal Prolapse on Surgical Outcomes and Prolapse Symptoms at 5 Years in the OPTIMAL Randomized Clinical Trial. Jelovsek JE; Barber MD; Brubaker L; Norton P; Gantz M; Richter HE; Weidner A; Menefee S; Schaffer J; Pugh N; Meikle S; JAMA; 2018 Apr; 319(15):1554-1565. PubMed ID: 29677302 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of vaginal mesh repair with sacrospinous vaginal colpopexy in the management of vaginal vault prolapse after hysterectomy in patients with levator ani avulsion: a randomized controlled trial. Svabik K; Martan A; Masata J; El-Haddad R; Hubka P Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Apr; 43(4):365-71. PubMed ID: 24615948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sacrospinous ligament fixation for massive genital prolapse in women aged over 80 years. Nieminen K; Heinonen PK BJOG; 2001 Aug; 108(8):817-21. PubMed ID: 11510706 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Three-year outcomes of a randomized clinical trial of perioperative vaginal estrogen as adjunct to native tissue vaginal apical prolapse repair. Rahn DD; Richter HE; Sung VW; Pruszynski JE Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2024 Aug; 231(2):263.e1-263.e10. PubMed ID: 38710269 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quality of life and sexuality after bilateral sacrospinous fixation with vaginal hysterectomy for treatment of primary pelvic organ prolapse. Yalcin Y; Demir Caltekin M; Eris Yalcin S Low Urin Tract Symptoms; 2020 Sep; 12(3):206-210. PubMed ID: 32003546 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of patients undergoing vaginal hysterectomy with sacrospinous ligament fixation, laparoscopic hysterectomy with sacrocolpopexy and abdominal hysterectomy with sacrocolpopexy in terms of postoperative quality of life and sexual function. Okcu NT; Gürbüz T; Uysal G J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2021 Apr; 50(4):101977. PubMed ID: 33166707 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Repair of recurrent vaginal vault prolapse using sacrospinous ligament fixation with mesh interposition and reinforcement. Lo TS; Horng SG; Huang HJ; Lee SJ; Liang CC Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2005 Oct; 84(10):992-5. PubMed ID: 16167917 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Outcomes of vaginal hysterectomy for uterovaginal prolapse: a population-based, retrospective, cross-sectional study of patient perceptions of results including sexual activity, urinary symptoms, and provided care. Pakbaz M; Mogren I; Löfgren M BMC Womens Health; 2009 Apr; 9():9. PubMed ID: 19379514 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]