These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. Medium-term outcomes of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy or sacrohysteropexy versus vaginal sacrospinous ligament fixation for middle compartment prolapse. Chen Y; Hua K Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2017 May; 137(2):164-169. PubMed ID: 28099748 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Vaginal hysterectomy with bilateral sacrospinous fixation plus an anterior mesh versus abdominal sacrocervicopexy for the treatment of primary apical prolapse in postmenopausal women: a randomized controlled study. de Castro EB; Brito LGO; Juliato CRT Int Urogynecol J; 2020 Feb; 31(2):365-372. PubMed ID: 31028421 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Sacrospinous ligament fixation and modified McCall culdoplasty during vaginal hysterectomy for advanced uterovaginal prolapse. Colombo M; Milani R Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Jul; 179(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 9704759 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Impact of transvaginal modified sacrospinous ligament fixation with mesh for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse-before and after studies. Zhu Q; Shu H; Du G; Dai Z Int J Surg; 2018 Apr; 52():40-43. PubMed ID: 29455045 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Long-term outcome of native tissue reconstructive vaginal surgery for advanced pelvic organ prolapse at 86 months: Hysterectomy versus hysteropexy. Lo TS; Pue LB; Hung TH; Wu PY; Tan YL J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2015 Jul; 41(7):1099-107. PubMed ID: 25808989 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Two parallel, pragmatic, UK multicentre, randomised controlled trials comparing surgical options for upper compartment (vault or uterine) pelvic organ prolapse (the VUE Study): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Glazener C; Constable L; Hemming C; Breeman S; Elders A; Cooper K; Freeman R; Smith AR; Hagen S; McDonald A; McPherson G; Montgomery I; Kilonzo M; Boyers D; Goulao B; Norrie J Trials; 2016 Sep; 17(1):441. PubMed ID: 27609058 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Correlation of subjective and objective assessment of vaginal prolapse surgery - secondary analysis of randomized controlled study in patients with pelvic floor injury treated with vaginal mesh or with sacrospinous ligament fixation]. Švabík K; El Haddad R; Mašata J; Hubka P; Martan A Ceska Gynekol; 2015 Oct; 80(5):351-4. PubMed ID: 26606120 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Transvaginal polypropylene mesh versus sacrospinous ligament fixation for the treatment of uterine prolapse: 1-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. Lopes ED; Lemos NL; Carramão Sda S; Lunardelli JL; Ruano JM; Aoki T; Auge AP Int Urogynecol J; 2010 Apr; 21(4):389-94. PubMed ID: 19936588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Laparoscopic inguinal ligament suspension versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Li C; Dai Z; Shu H Trials; 2018 Mar; 19(1):160. PubMed ID: 29506566 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Effect of Vaginal Mesh Hysteropexy vs Vaginal Hysterectomy With Uterosacral Ligament Suspension on Treatment Failure in Women With Uterovaginal Prolapse: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Nager CW; Visco AG; Richter HE; Rardin CR; Rogers RG; Harvie HS; Zyczynski HM; Paraiso MFR; Mazloomdoost D; Grey S; Sridhar A; Wallace D; JAMA; 2019 Sep; 322(11):1054-1065. PubMed ID: 31529008 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Fast track sacrospinous ligament fixation: subjective and objective outcomes at 6 months. Greisen S; Axelsen SM; Bek KM; Guldberg R; Glavind-Kristensen M BMC Womens Health; 2021 Apr; 21(1):154. PubMed ID: 33863314 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Perioperative Vaginal Estrogen as Adjunct to Native Tissue Vaginal Apical Prolapse Repair: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Rahn DD; Richter HE; Sung VW; Pruszynski JE; Hynan LS JAMA; 2023 Aug; 330(7):615-625. PubMed ID: 37581673 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Sacrospinous ligament vaginal vault fixation--method, results and a one-year follow up in 10 patients]. Malinowski A; Pawłowski T; Maciołek-Blewniewska G; Augustyniak T Ginekol Pol; 2004 Sep; 75(9):713-9. PubMed ID: 15600295 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparison of two natural tissue repair-based surgical techniques; sacrospinous fixation and uterosacral ligament suspension for pelvic organ prolapse treatment. Topdagi Yilmaz EP; Yapca OE; Topdagi YE; Atakan Al R; Kumtepe Y J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2021 Apr; 50(4):101905. PubMed ID: 32916370 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Application of transvaginal sacrospinous colpopexy in the treatment of pelvic organs prolapse]. Argirović R; Likić-Ladević I; Vrzić-Petronijević S; Petronijević M; Ladević N Vojnosanit Pregl; 2005 Sep; 62(9):637-43. PubMed ID: 16229205 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Genital prolapse repair using porcine skin implant and bilateral sacrospinous fixation: midterm functional outcome and quality-of-life assessment. Daraï E; Coutant C; Rouzier R; Ballester M; David-Montefiore E; Apfelbaum D Urology; 2009 Feb; 73(2):245-50. PubMed ID: 19038431 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Anatomical and functional outcomes after hysterectomy and bilateral sacrospinous ligament fixation for stage IV uterovaginal prolapse: a prospective case series. Kavvadias T; Schoenfisch B; Brucker SY; Reisenauer C BMC Urol; 2020 Aug; 20(1):126. PubMed ID: 32814553 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. One-year follow-up after sacrospinous hysteropexy and vaginal hysterectomy for uterine descent: a randomized study. Dietz V; van der Vaart CH; van der Graaf Y; Heintz P; Schraffordt Koops SE Int Urogynecol J; 2010 Feb; 21(2):209-16. PubMed ID: 19834635 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]