147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21324334)
21. Selective interference on the holistic processing of faces in working memory.
Cheung OS; Gauthier I
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Apr; 36(2):448-61. PubMed ID: 20364929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The role of view in human face detection.
Burton AM; Bindemann M
Vision Res; 2009 Jul; 49(15):2026-36. PubMed ID: 19464312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Sex differences in face gender recognition: an event-related potential study.
Sun Y; Gao X; Han S
Brain Res; 2010 Apr; 1327():69-76. PubMed ID: 20153301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Recognizing people from dynamic and static faces and bodies: dissecting identity with a fusion approach.
O'Toole AJ; Phillips PJ; Weimer S; Roark DA; Ayyad J; Barwick R; Dunlop J
Vision Res; 2011 Jan; 51(1):74-83. PubMed ID: 20969886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The M170 reflects a viewpoint-dependent representation for both familiar and unfamiliar faces.
Ewbank MP; Smith WA; Hancock ER; Andrews TJ
Cereb Cortex; 2008 Feb; 18(2):364-70. PubMed ID: 17507454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Acquired prosopagnosia as a face-specific disorder: ruling out the general visual similarity account.
Busigny T; Graf M; Mayer E; Rossion B
Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jun; 48(7):2051-67. PubMed ID: 20362595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Face recognition: Are viewpoint and identity processed after face detection?
Or CC; Wilson HR
Vision Res; 2010 Jul; 50(16):1581-9. PubMed ID: 20493901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Why mix-ups don't happen in the nursery: evidence for an experience-based interpretation of the other-age effect.
Cassia VM; Picozzi M; Kuefner D; Casati M
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Jun; 62(6):1099-107. PubMed ID: 19142827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Center-surround organization of face-space: evidence from contrast-based face-priming.
Rostamirad S; Barton JJ; Oruç I
Neuroreport; 2009 Aug; 20(13):1177-82. PubMed ID: 19597376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Symmetrical Viewpoint Representations in Face-Selective Regions Convey an Advantage in the Perception and Recognition of Faces.
Flack TR; Harris RJ; Young AW; Andrews TJ
J Neurosci; 2019 May; 39(19):3741-3751. PubMed ID: 30842248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Perceptual learning modifies inversion effects for faces and textures.
Hussain Z; Sekuler AB; Bennett PJ
Vision Res; 2009 Sep; 49(18):2273-84. PubMed ID: 19555706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Spatial frequency tuning of upright and inverted face identification.
Gaspar C; Sekuler AB; Bennett PJ
Vision Res; 2008 Dec; 48(28):2817-26. PubMed ID: 18835403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Hemispheric asymmetry in face perception tasks of different cognitive requirement.
Marzi CA; Tassinari G; Tressoldi PE; Barry C; Grabowska A
Hum Neurobiol; 1985; 4(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 3997584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The effects of inversion and eye displacements of familiar and unknown faces on early and late-stage ERPs.
Caharel S; Fiori N; Bernard C; Lalonde R; Rebaï M
Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Oct; 62(1):141-51. PubMed ID: 16678927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Examining the hemispheric distribution of semantic information using lateralised priming of familiar faces.
Vladeanu M; Bourne VJ
Brain Cogn; 2009 Mar; 69(2):420-5. PubMed ID: 18977064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Angry faces are special too: evidence from the visual scanpath.
Bate S; Haslam C; Hodgson TL
Neuropsychology; 2009 Sep; 23(5):658-67. PubMed ID: 19702419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The age of the beholder: ERP evidence of an own-age bias in face memory.
Wiese H; Schweinberger SR; Hansen K
Neuropsychologia; 2008 Oct; 46(12):2973-85. PubMed ID: 18602408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Recalling episodic information about personally known faces and voices.
Barsics C; Brédart S
Conscious Cogn; 2011 Jun; 20(2):303-8. PubMed ID: 20381380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Component structure of individual differences in true and false recognition of faces.
Bartlett JC; Shastri KK; Abdi H; Neville-Smith M
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Sep; 35(5):1207-30. PubMed ID: 19686016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The brain response to personally familiar faces in autism: findings of fusiform activity and beyond.
Pierce K; Haist F; Sedaghat F; Courchesne E
Brain; 2004 Dec; 127(Pt 12):2703-16. PubMed ID: 15319275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
