BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21324455)

  • 1. A randomized trial of microdose leuprolide acetate protocol versus luteal phase ganirelix protocol in predicted poor responders.
    DiLuigi AJ; Engmann L; Schmidt DW; Benadiva CA; Nulsen JC
    Fertil Steril; 2011 Jun; 95(8):2531-3. PubMed ID: 21324455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Delayed Start Versus Conventional GnRH Antagonist Protocol in Poor Responders Pretreated With Estradiol in Luteal Phase: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Maged AM; Nada AM; Abohamila F; Hashem AT; Mostafa WA; Elzayat AR
    Reprod Sci; 2015 Dec; 22(12):1627-31. PubMed ID: 26045549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Stimulation of the young poor responder: comparison of the luteal estradiol/gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist priming protocol versus oral contraceptive microdose leuprolide.
    Shastri SM; Barbieri E; Kligman I; Schoyer KD; Davis OK; Rosenwaks Z
    Fertil Steril; 2011 Feb; 95(2):592-5. PubMed ID: 21074154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of luteal phase vaginal estradiol supplementation on the success of in vitro fertilization treatment: a prospective randomized study.
    Engmann L; DiLuigi A; Schmidt D; Benadiva C; Maier D; Nulsen J
    Fertil Steril; 2008 Mar; 89(3):554-61. PubMed ID: 17678651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Letrozole and gonadotropins versus luteal estradiol and gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol in women with a prior low response to ovarian stimulation.
    Elassar A; Engmann L; Nulsen J; Benadiva C
    Fertil Steril; 2011 Jun; 95(7):2330-4. PubMed ID: 21514582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Microdose gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist flare-up protocol versus multiple dose gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol in poor responders undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection-embryo transfer cycle.
    Kahraman K; Berker B; Atabekoglu CS; Sonmezer M; Cetinkaya E; Aytac R; Satiroglu H
    Fertil Steril; 2009 Jun; 91(6):2437-44. PubMed ID: 18555238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Low-dose GnRH antagonist protocol is as effective as the long GnRH agonist protocol in unselected patients undergoing in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer.
    Huang SY; Huang HY; Yu HT; Wang HS; Chen CK; Lee CL; Soong YK
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Dec; 50(4):432-5. PubMed ID: 22212313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Minimal stimulation protocol using letrozole versus microdose flare up GnRH agonist protocol in women with poor ovarian response undergoing ICSI.
    Mohsen IA; El Din RE
    Gynecol Endocrinol; 2013 Feb; 29(2):105-8. PubMed ID: 23134528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Luteal-phase ovarian stimulation is a feasible method for poor ovarian responders undergoing in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection-embryo transfer treatment compared to a GnRH antagonist protocol: A retrospective study.
    Wei LH; Ma WH; Tang N; Wei JH
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Feb; 55(1):50-4. PubMed ID: 26927248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Management of poor responders: can outcomes be improved with a novel gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist/letrozole protocol?
    Schoolcraft WB; Surrey ES; Minjarez DA; Stevens JM; Gardner DK
    Fertil Steril; 2008 Jan; 89(1):151-6. PubMed ID: 17482177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The addition of gonadotrophin releasing hormone agonist to routine luteal phase support in intracytoplasmic sperm injection and embryo transfer cycles: a randomized clinical trial.
    Yıldız GA; Şükür YE; Ateş C; Aytaç R
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2014 Nov; 182():66-70. PubMed ID: 25238659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of luteal estradiol patch and gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist suppression protocol before gonadotropin stimulation versus microdose gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist protocol for patients with a history of poor in vitro fertilization outcomes.
    Weitzman VN; Engmann L; DiLuigi A; Maier D; Nulsen J; Benadiva C
    Fertil Steril; 2009 Jul; 92(1):226-30. PubMed ID: 18675961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Treatment with gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists in women suppressed with GnRH agonist may avoid cycle cancellation in patients at risk for ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome.
    Gustofson RL; Larsen FW; Bush MR; Segars JH
    Fertil Steril; 2006 Jan; 85(1):251-4. PubMed ID: 16412770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical outcome of using ganirelix acetate versus a 4-day follicular phase leuprolide acetate protocol in unselected women undergoing in vitro fertilization.
    Posada MN; Vlahos NP; Jurema MW; Bracero NJ; Wallach EE; Garcia JE
    Fertil Steril; 2003 Jul; 80(1):103-10. PubMed ID: 12849810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ultrashort gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist combined with flexible multidose gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist for poor responders in in vitro fertilization/embryo transfer programs.
    Orvieto R; Kruchkovich J; Rabinson J; Zohav E; Anteby EY; Meltcer S
    Fertil Steril; 2008 Jul; 90(1):228-30. PubMed ID: 17681292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Intranasal gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) for luteal-phase support following GnRHa triggering, a novel approach to avoid ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in high responders.
    Bar-Hava I; Mizrachi Y; Karfunkel-Doron D; Omer Y; Sheena L; Carmon N; Ben-David G
    Fertil Steril; 2016 Aug; 106(2):330-3. PubMed ID: 27114332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A randomized prospective trial comparing gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist/recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (rFSH) versus GnRH-agonist/rFSH in women pretreated with oral contraceptives before in vitro fertilization.
    Barmat LI; Chantilis SJ; Hurst BS; Dickey RP
    Fertil Steril; 2005 Feb; 83(2):321-30. PubMed ID: 15705369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. GnRH antagonist versus long GnRH agonist protocol in poor responders undergoing IVF: a randomized controlled trial.
    Cheung LP; Lam PM; Lok IH; Chiu TT; Yeung SY; Tjer CC; Haines CJ
    Hum Reprod; 2005 Mar; 20(3):616-21. PubMed ID: 15608037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Comparison of GnRH agonists and antagonists in an ovular donation program].
    Saucedo de la Llata E; Moraga Sánchez MR; Batiza Reséndiz V; Santos Haliscak R; Galache Vega P; Hernández Ayup S
    Ginecol Obstet Mex; 2004 Feb; 72():53-6. PubMed ID: 15216901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Changes in long luteal protocol affects the number of days of stimulation: evolution of an assisted reproductive technology practice.
    Palmer CB; Forstein DA; Higdon HL; Boone WR
    J Reprod Med; 2011; 56(7-8):308-12. PubMed ID: 21838160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.