150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21324538)
1. Gender influence on dose saving allowed by prospective-triggered 64-slice multidetector computed tomography coronary angiography as compared with retrospective-gated mode.
Esposito A; De Cobelli F; Colantoni C; Perseghin G; Del Vecchio A; Canu T; Calandrino R; Del Maschio A
Int J Cardiol; 2012 Jul; 158(2):253-9. PubMed ID: 21324538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Radiation dose reduction and coronary assessability of prospective electrocardiogram-gated computed tomography coronary angiography: comparison with retrospective electrocardiogram-gated helical scan.
Maruyama T; Takada M; Hasuike T; Yoshikawa A; Namimatsu E; Yoshizumi T
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2008 Oct; 52(18):1450-5. PubMed ID: 19017511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The optimal dose reduction level using iterative reconstruction with prospective ECG-triggered coronary CTA using 256-slice MDCT.
Hou Y; Xu S; Guo W; Vembar M; Guo Q
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Dec; 81(12):3905-11. PubMed ID: 23036786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Step-and-shoot prospectively ECG-gated versus retrospectively ECG-gated with tube current modulation coronary CT angiography using the 128-slice MDCT: comparison of image quality and radiation dose.
Jeong DW; Choo KS; Baik SK; Kim YW; Jeon UB; Kim JS; Lim SJ
Acta Radiol; 2011 Mar; 52(2):155-60. PubMed ID: 21498343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. CT angiography of neonates and infants: comparison of radiation dose and image quality of target mode prospectively ECG-gated 320-MDCT and ungated helical 64-MDCT.
Jadhav SP; Golriz F; Atweh LA; Zhang W; Krishnamurthy R
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Feb; 204(2):W184-91. PubMed ID: 25615779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Multidetector computed tomography for coronary stents imaging: high-voltage (140-kVp) prospective ECG-triggered versus standard-voltage (120-kVp) retrospective ECG-gated helical scanning.
Esposito A; Colantoni C; De Cobelli F; Del Vecchio A; Palmisano A; Calandrino R; Del Maschio A
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2013; 37(3):395-401. PubMed ID: 23674011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diagnostic performance of two types of low radiation exposure protocol for prospective ECG-triggering multidetector computed tomography angiography in assessment of coronary artery bypass graft.
Andreini D; Pontone G; Mushtaq S; Annoni A; Formenti A; Bertella E; Parolari A; Agostoni P; Bartorelli A; Ballerini G; Fiorentini C; Pepi M
Int J Cardiol; 2012 May; 157(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 21193234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Post-CABG coronary CT angiography: radiation dose and graft image quality in retrospective versus prospective ECG gating.
Chazen JL; Prince MR; Yip R; Min JK; Weinsaft JW; Henschke CI; Cham MD
Acad Radiol; 2010 Sep; 17(9):1122-7. PubMed ID: 20542451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Coronary CT angiography with single-source and dual-source CT: comparison of image quality and radiation dose between prospective ECG-triggered and retrospective ECG-gated protocols.
Sabarudin A; Sun Z; Yusof AK
Int J Cardiol; 2013 Sep; 168(2):746-53. PubMed ID: 23098849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Radiation dose in a "triple rule-out" coronary CT angiography protocol of emergency department patients using 64-MDCT: the impact of ECG-based tube current modulation on age, sex, and body mass index.
Takakuwa KM; Halpern EJ; Gingold EL; Levin DC; Shofer FS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Apr; 192(4):866-72. PubMed ID: 19304688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Diagnostic accuracy and effective radiation dose of high pitch dual source multidetector computed tomography in evaluation of coronary artery bypass graft patency.
Koplay M; Guneyli S; Akbayrak H; Demir K; Sivri M; Avci A; Erdogan H; Paksoy Y
Wien Klin Wochenschr; 2016 Jul; 128(13-14):488-94. PubMed ID: 27343083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Feasibility and diagnostic accuracy of a low radiation exposure protocol for prospective ECG-triggering coronary MDCT angiography.
Pontone G; Andreini D; Bartorelli AL; Bertella E; Mushtaq S; Foti C; Formenti A; Chiappa L; Annoni A; Cortinovis S; Baggiano A; Conte E; Bovis F; Veglia F; Ballerini G; Agostoni P; Fiorentini C; Pepi M
Clin Radiol; 2012 Mar; 67(3):207-15. PubMed ID: 22154609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prospective versus retrospective ECG gating for 320-detector CT of the coronary arteries: comparison of image quality and patient radiation dose.
Qin J; Liu LY; Meng XC; Zhang JS; Dong YX; Fang Y; Shan H
Clin Imaging; 2011; 35(3):193-7. PubMed ID: 21513855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Radiation dose exposure of computed tomography coronary angiography: comparison of dual-source, 16-slice and 64-slice CT.
Rixe J; Conradi G; Rolf A; Schmermund A; Magedanz A; Erkapic D; Deetjen A; Hamm CW; Dill T
Heart; 2009 Aug; 95(16):1337-42. PubMed ID: 19482842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Multidetector Computed Tomography Angiography (MD-CTA) of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafts - Update 2017.
Jungmann F; Emrich T; Mildenberger P; Emrich AL; Düber C; Kreitner KF
Rofo; 2018 Mar; 190(3):237-249. PubMed ID: 29100255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Step-and-shoot prospectively ECG-gated vs. retrospectively ECG-gated with tube current modulation coronary CT angiography using 128-slice MDCT patients with chest pain: diagnostic performance and radiation dose.
Kim JS; Choo KS; Jeong DW; Chun KJ; Park YH; Song SG; Park JH; Kim JH; Kim J; Han D; Lim SJ
Acta Radiol; 2011 Oct; 52(8):860-5. PubMed ID: 21873509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Radiation dose in coronary artery angiography with 320-detector row CT and its diagnostic accuracy: comparison with 64-detector row CT.
Zhang T; Luo Z; Wang D; Han D; Bai J; Meng X; Shen B
Minerva Med; 2011 Aug; 102(4):249-59. PubMed ID: 21959699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prospective versus retrospective ECG gating for dual source CT of the coronary stent: comparison of image quality, accuracy, and radiation dose.
Zhao L; Zhang Z; Fan Z; Yang L; Du J
Eur J Radiol; 2011 Mar; 77(3):436-42. PubMed ID: 19783395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Head-to-head comparison of prospectively triggered vs retrospectively gated coronary computed tomography angiography: Meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy, image quality, and radiation dose.
Menke J; Unterberg-Buchwald C; Staab W; Sohns JM; Seif Amir Hosseini A; Schwarz A
Am Heart J; 2013 Feb; 165(2):154-63.e3. PubMed ID: 23351817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prospective ECG triggering versus low-dose retrospective ECG-gated 128-channel CT coronary angiography: comparison of image quality and radiation dose.
Feng Q; Yin Y; Hua X; Zhu R; Hua J; Xu J
Clin Radiol; 2010 Oct; 65(10):809-14. PubMed ID: 20797467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
