220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21325947)
1. Determining perceived sound quality in a simulated hearing aid using the international speech test signal.
Arehart KH; Kates JM; Anderson MC; Moats P
Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):533-5. PubMed ID: 21325947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of noise, nonlinear processing, and linear filtering on perceived speech quality.
Arehart KH; Kates JM; Anderson MC
Ear Hear; 2010 Jun; 31(3):420-36. PubMed ID: 20440116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sound Quality Effects of an Adaptive Nonlinear Frequency Compression Processor with Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners.
Glista D; Hawkins M; Vaisberg JM; Pourmand N; Parsa V; Scollie S
J Am Acad Audiol; 2019; 30(7):552-563. PubMed ID: 30395533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of slow-acting wide dynamic range compression on measures of intelligibility and ratings of speech quality in simulated-loss listeners.
Rosengard PS; Payton KL; Braida LD
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Jun; 48(3):702-14. PubMed ID: 16197282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Perception of clear fricatives by normal-hearing and simulated hearing-impaired listeners.
Maniwa K; Jongman A; Wade T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Feb; 123(2):1114-25. PubMed ID: 18247912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparing Binaural Pre-processing Strategies III: Speech Intelligibility of Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners.
Völker C; Warzybok A; Ernst SM
Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26721922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of noise and distortion on speech quality judgments in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
Arehart KH; Kates JM; Anderson MC; Harvey LO
J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Aug; 122(2):1150-64. PubMed ID: 17672661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners.
Burk MH; Humes LE; Amos NE; Strauser LE
Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reliability and validity of judgments of sound quality in elderly hearing aid wearers.
Narendran MM; Humes LE
Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1):4-11. PubMed ID: 12598808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Auditory and auditory-visual intelligibility of speech in fluctuating maskers for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
Bernstein JG; Grant KW
J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 May; 125(5):3358-72. PubMed ID: 19425676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Speech intelligibility as a predictor of cochlear implant outcome in prelingually deafened adults.
van Dijkhuizen JN; Beers M; Boermans PP; Briaire JJ; Frijns JH
Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):445-58. PubMed ID: 21258238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Children's speech recognition scores: the Speech Intelligibility Index and proficiency factors for age and hearing level.
Scollie SD
Ear Hear; 2008 Aug; 29(4):543-56. PubMed ID: 18469717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Content and procedural learning in repeated sentence tests of speech perception.
Yund EW; Woods DL
Ear Hear; 2010 Dec; 31(6):769-78. PubMed ID: 20562624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Development of the ORCA nonsense syllable test.
Kuk F; Lau CC; Korhonen P; Crose B; Peeters H; Keenan D
Ear Hear; 2010 Dec; 31(6):779-95. PubMed ID: 20622673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of transient noise reduction algorithms on speech intelligibility and ratings of hearing aid users.
DiGiovanni JJ; Davlin EA; Nagaraj NK
Am J Audiol; 2011 Dec; 20(2):140-50. PubMed ID: 21940982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cognitive load during speech perception in noise: the influence of age, hearing loss, and cognition on the pupil response.
Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):498-510. PubMed ID: 21233711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of noise, nonlinear processing, and linear filtering on perceived music quality.
Arehart KH; Kates JM; Anderson MC
Int J Audiol; 2011 Mar; 50(3):177-90. PubMed ID: 21319935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Intelligibility of speech in noise at high presentation levels: effects of hearing loss and frequency region.
Summers V; Cord MT
J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Aug; 122(2):1130-7. PubMed ID: 17672659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Audibility-index predictions of normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners' performance on the connected speech test.
Sherbecoe RL; Studebaker GA
Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1):71-88. PubMed ID: 12598814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Development and analysis of an International Speech Test Signal (ISTS).
Holube I; Fredelake S; Vlaming M; Kollmeier B
Int J Audiol; 2010 Dec; 49(12):891-903. PubMed ID: 21070124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
