220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21325947)
21. New developments in speech pattern element hearing aids for the profoundly deaf.
Faulkner A; Walliker JR; Howard IS; Ball V; Fourcin AJ
Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 38():124-35. PubMed ID: 8153558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Speech-clarity judgments of hearing-aid-processed speech in noise: differing polar patterns and acoustic environments.
Amlani AM; Rakerd B; Punch JL
Int J Audiol; 2006 Jun; 45(6):319-30. PubMed ID: 16777778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The influence of age, hearing, and working memory on the speech comprehension benefit derived from an automatic speech recognition system.
Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Kessens JM; Vlaming MS; Houtgast T
Ear Hear; 2009 Apr; 30(2):262-72. PubMed ID: 19194286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Timbre discrimination in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners under different noise conditions.
Emiroglu S; Kollmeier B
Brain Res; 2008 Jul; 1220():199-207. PubMed ID: 17991457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Effects of training on naïve listeners' judgments of the speech intelligibility of children with severe-to-profound hearing loss.
Ellis LW; Beltyukova SA
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2008 Oct; 51(5):1114-23. PubMed ID: 18664708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Auditory steady-state responses and word recognition scores in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired adults.
Dimitrijevic A; John MS; Picton TW
Ear Hear; 2004 Feb; 25(1):68-84. PubMed ID: 14770019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Using Objective Metrics to Measure Hearing Aid Performance.
Kates JM; Arehart KH; Anderson MC; Kumar Muralimanohar R; Harvey LO
Ear Hear; 2018; 39(6):1165-1175. PubMed ID: 29554034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Modeling speech intelligibility in quiet and noise in listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
Rhebergen KS; Lyzenga J; Dreschler WA; Festen JM
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Mar; 127(3):1570-83. PubMed ID: 20329857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Relations between frequency selectivity, temporal fine-structure processing, and speech reception in impaired hearing.
Strelcyk O; Dau T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 May; 125(5):3328-45. PubMed ID: 19425674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Relations Between the Intelligibility of Speech in Noise and Psychophysical Measures of Hearing Measured in Four Languages Using the Auditory Profile Test Battery.
Van Esch TE; Dreschler WA
Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26647417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Pupil response as an indication of effortful listening: the influence of sentence intelligibility.
Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):480-90. PubMed ID: 20588118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Effect of spatial separation, extended bandwidth, and compression speed on intelligibility in a competing-speech task.
Moore BC; Füllgrabe C; Stone MA
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Jul; 128(1):360-71. PubMed ID: 20649230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Subjective and objective effects of fast and slow compression on the perception of reverberant speech in listeners with hearing loss.
Shi LF; Doherty KA
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2008 Oct; 51(5):1328-40. PubMed ID: 18664685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. How does linguistic complexity influence intelligibility in a German audiometric sentence intelligibility test?
Uslar V; Ruigendijk E; Hamann C; Brand T; Kollmeier B
Int J Audiol; 2011 Sep; 50(9):621-31. PubMed ID: 21714708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Speech sound discrimination and hearing-aid performance of severely hearing impaired school children].
Nakanishi Y
Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 1982 Apr; 85(4):422-31. PubMed ID: 7119926
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. A model for the speech-reception threshold in noise without and with a hearing aid.
Plomp R; Duquesnoy AJ
Scand Audiol Suppl; 1982; 15():95-111. PubMed ID: 6955931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Effects of noise suppression on intelligibility: experts' opinions and naive normal-hearing listeners' performance.
Hilkhuysen GL; Gaubitch N; Huckvale M
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2013 Apr; 56(2):404-15. PubMed ID: 23090965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Contribution of consonant versus vowel information to sentence intelligibility for young normal-hearing and elderly hearing-impaired listeners.
Kewley-Port D; Burkle TZ; Lee JH
J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Oct; 122(4):2365-75. PubMed ID: 17902871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. An overview of the HASPI and HASQI metrics for predicting speech intelligibility and speech quality for normal hearing, hearing loss, and hearing aids.
Kates JM; Arehart KH
Hear Res; 2022 Dec; 426():108608. PubMed ID: 36137862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Real-time multiband dynamic compression and noise reduction for binaural hearing aids.
Kollmeier B; Peissig J; Hohmann V
J Rehabil Res Dev; 1993; 30(1):82-94. PubMed ID: 8263832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
