These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21327339)

  • 1. The effect of lexical predictability on distributions of eye fixation durations.
    Staub A
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2011 Apr; 18(2):371-6. PubMed ID: 21327339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Individual differences in fixation duration distributions in reading.
    Staub A; Benatar A
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2013 Dec; 20(6):1304-11. PubMed ID: 23637011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Distributional effects of word frequency on eye fixation durations.
    Staub A; White SJ; Drieghe D; Hollway EC; Rayner K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Oct; 36(5):1280-93. PubMed ID: 20873939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The time course of contextual influences during lexical ambiguity resolution: evidence from distributional analyses of fixation durations.
    Sheridan H; Reingold EM
    Mem Cognit; 2012 Oct; 40(7):1122-31. PubMed ID: 22576974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The time course of age-of-acquisition effects on eye movements during reading: Evidence from survival analyses.
    Juhasz BJ; Sheridan H
    Mem Cognit; 2020 Jan; 48(1):83-95. PubMed ID: 31278632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Lexical predictability exerts robust effects on fixation duration, but not on initial landing position during reading.
    Vainio S; Hyönä J; Pajunen A
    Exp Psychol; 2009; 56(1):66-74. PubMed ID: 19261580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The distribution of fixation durations during reading: effects of stimulus quality.
    White SJ; Staub A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Jun; 38(3):603-17. PubMed ID: 21910560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Lexical and message-level sentence context effects on fixation times in reading.
    Morris RK
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1994 Jan; 20(1):92-103. PubMed ID: 8138791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Word's Contextual Predictability and Its Character Frequency Effects in Chinese Reading: Evidence From Eye Movements.
    Liu Z; Liu X; Tong W; Fu F
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():1833. PubMed ID: 32982821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Word-Initial Letters Influence Fixation Durations during Fluent Reading.
    Hand CJ; O'Donnell PJ; Sereno SC
    Front Psychol; 2012; 3():85. PubMed ID: 22485100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Word frequency, predictability, and return-sweep saccades: Towards the modeling of eye movements during paragraph reading.
    Parker AJ; Slattery TJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Dec; 45(12):1614-1633. PubMed ID: 31524433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effects of frequency and predictability on eye fixations in reading: implications for the E-Z Reader model.
    Rayner K; Ashby J; Pollatsek A; Reichle ED
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Aug; 30(4):720-32. PubMed ID: 15301620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Testing the limits of contextual constraint: Interactions with word frequency and parafoveal preview during fluent reading.
    Sereno SC; Hand CJ; Shahid A; Yao B; O'Donnell PJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Jan; 71(1):302-313. PubMed ID: 28481189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of word predictability on eye movements during Arabic reading.
    AlJassmi MA; Warrington KL; McGowan VA; White SJ; Paterson KB
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 Jan; 84(1):10-24. PubMed ID: 34632557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Literacy skill and intra-individual variability in eye-fixation durations during reading: Evidence from a diverse community-based adult sample.
    Payne BR; Federmeier KD; Stine-Morrow EA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2020 Nov; 73(11):1841-1861. PubMed ID: 32484390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of thematic and lexical priming on readers' eye movements.
    Hyönä J
    Scand J Psychol; 1993 Dec; 34(4):293-304. PubMed ID: 8303233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Emotion words affect eye fixations during reading.
    Scott GG; O'Donnell PJ; Sereno SC
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 May; 38(3):783-92. PubMed ID: 22329788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Linguistic networks associated with lexical, semantic and syntactic predictability in reading: A fixation-related fMRI study.
    Carter BT; Foster B; Muncy NM; Luke SG
    Neuroimage; 2019 Apr; 189():224-240. PubMed ID: 30654173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Synchronizing timelines: relations between fixation durations and N400 amplitudes during sentence reading.
    Dambacher M; Kliegl R
    Brain Res; 2007 Jun; 1155():147-62. PubMed ID: 17499223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Eye movements of highly skilled and average readers: differential effects of frequency and predictability.
    Ashby J; Rayner K; Clifton C
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2005 Aug; 58(6):1065-86. PubMed ID: 16194948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.