These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21327350)

  • 1. Contrasting cue-density effects in causal and prediction judgments.
    Vadillo MA; Musca SC; Blanco F; Matute H
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2011 Feb; 18(1):110-5. PubMed ID: 21327350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cue interaction and judgments of causality: contributions of causal and associative processes.
    Tangen JM; Allan LG
    Mem Cognit; 2004 Jan; 32(1):107-24. PubMed ID: 15078048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of cue competition in a simple and a complex design.
    Vandorpe S; De Houwer J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2006 Jul; 122(3):234-46. PubMed ID: 16405898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cue-interaction effects in contingency judgments using the streamed-trial procedure.
    Hannah SD; Crump MJ; Allan LG; Siegel S
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2009 Jun; 63(2):103-12. PubMed ID: 19485601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Super-learning of causal judgements.
    Aitken MR; Larkin MJ; Dickinson A
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 2000 Feb; 53(1):59-81. PubMed ID: 10718060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cue interaction effects in causal judgement: an interpretation in terms of the evidential evaluation model.
    White PA
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 2005 Apr; 58(2):99-140. PubMed ID: 16095042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Predictions and causal estimations are not supported by the same associative structure.
    Vadillo MA; Matute H
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Mar; 60(3):433-47. PubMed ID: 17366310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accounting for occurrences: a new view of the use of contingency information in causal judgment.
    White PA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Jan; 34(1):204-18. PubMed ID: 18194063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The role of contingency and contiguity in young and older adults' causal learning.
    Mutter SA; DeCaro MS; Plumlee LF
    J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci; 2009 May; 64(3):315-23. PubMed ID: 19299255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. On the role of causal intervention in multiple-cue judgment: positive and negative effects on learning.
    Enkvist T; Newell B; Juslin P; Olsson H
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jan; 32(1):163-79. PubMed ID: 16478348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Extinction in human learning and memory.
    Scully AL; Mitchell CJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Oct; 61(10):1472-8. PubMed ID: 18609395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Causal judgment from contingency information: relation between subjective reports and individual tendencies in judgment.
    White PA
    Mem Cognit; 2000 Apr; 28(3):415-26. PubMed ID: 10881559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Discrimination blocking: acquisition versus performance deficits in human contingency learning.
    Castro L; Wasserman EA
    Learn Behav; 2007 Aug; 35(3):149-62. PubMed ID: 17918420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Driven by power? Probe question and presentation format effects on causal judgment.
    Perales JC; Shanks DR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Nov; 34(6):1482-94. PubMed ID: 18980409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Inference-based retrospective revaluation in human causal judgments requires knowledge of within-compound relationships.
    Mitchell CJ; Killedar A; Lovibond PF
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2005 Oct; 31(4):418-24. PubMed ID: 16248728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Statistical contingency has a different impact on preparation judgements than on causal judgements.
    De Houwer J; Vandorpe S; Beckers T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Mar; 60(3):418-32. PubMed ID: 17366309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Recency and primacy in causal judgments: effects of probe question and context switch on latent inhibition and extinction.
    Glautier S
    Mem Cognit; 2008 Sep; 36(6):1087-93. PubMed ID: 18927027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The role of learning data in causal reasoning about observations and interventions.
    Meder B; Hagmayer Y; Waldmann MR
    Mem Cognit; 2009 Apr; 37(3):249-64. PubMed ID: 19246341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Information integration in multiple cue judgment: a division of labor hypothesis.
    Juslin P; Karlsson L; Olsson H
    Cognition; 2008 Jan; 106(1):259-98. PubMed ID: 17376423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cue interaction in human contingency judgment.
    Chapman GB; Robbins SJ
    Mem Cognit; 1990 Sep; 18(5):537-45. PubMed ID: 2233266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.