These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21327350)

  • 21. Cue interaction in human contingency judgment.
    Chapman GB; Robbins SJ
    Mem Cognit; 1990 Sep; 18(5):537-45. PubMed ID: 2233266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Human causality judgments and response rates on DRL and DRH schedules of reinforcement.
    Reed P
    Learn Behav; 2003 May; 31(2):205-11. PubMed ID: 12882379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Selective attention in human associative learning and recognition memory.
    Griffiths O; Mitchell CJ
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2008 Nov; 137(4):626-48. PubMed ID: 18999357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The influence of causal information on judgments of treatment efficacy.
    Yopchick JE; Kim NS
    Mem Cognit; 2009 Jan; 37(1):29-41. PubMed ID: 19103973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Causal and predictive-value judgments, but not predictions, are based on cue-outcome contingency.
    Vadillo MA; Miller RR; Matute H
    Learn Behav; 2005 May; 33(2):172-83. PubMed ID: 16075837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Causal judgments about relations between multilevel variables.
    White PA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 Mar; 27(2):499-513. PubMed ID: 11294446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Flexible use of recent information in causal and predictive judgments.
    Matute H; Vegas S; De Marez PJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Jul; 28(4):714-25. PubMed ID: 12109763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The experimental task influences cue competition in human causal learning.
    Melchers KG; Ungör M; Lachnit H
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2005 Oct; 31(4):477-83. PubMed ID: 16248733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Blocking in human causal learning is affected by outcome assumptions manipulated through causal structure.
    Blanco F; Baeyens F; Beckers T
    Learn Behav; 2014 Jun; 42(2):185-99. PubMed ID: 24737045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Accounting for occurrences: an explanation for some novel tendencies in causal judgment from contingency information.
    White PA
    Mem Cognit; 2009 Jun; 37(4):500-13. PubMed ID: 19460956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Interference between cues of the same outcome depends on the causal interpretation of the events.
    Cobos PL; López FJ; Luque D
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Mar; 60(3):369-86. PubMed ID: 17366306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Base rates, contingencies, and prediction behavior.
    Kareev Y; Fiedler K; Avrahami J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Mar; 35(2):371-80. PubMed ID: 19271852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The relative effect of cue interaction.
    Tangen JM; Allan LG
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 2003 Aug; 56(3):279-300. PubMed ID: 12881163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Generality of the summation effect in human causal learning.
    Soto FA; Vogel EH; Castillo RD; Wagner AR
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 May; 62(5):877-89. PubMed ID: 19048450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Re-examination of the role of within-compound associations in the retrospective revaluation of causal judgements.
    Aitken MR; Larkin MJ; Dickinson A
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 2001 Feb; 54(1):27-51. PubMed ID: 11216299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A common error term regulates acquisition but not extinction of causal judgments in people.
    Griffiths O; Westbrook RF
    Learn Behav; 2012 Jun; 40(2):207-21. PubMed ID: 22201043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Inferring interventional predictions from observational learning data.
    Meder B; Hagmayer Y; Waldmann MR
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2008 Feb; 15(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 18605483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. People want to see information that will help them make valid inferences in human causal learning.
    Vandorpe S; De Houwer J
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Jul; 34(5):1133-9. PubMed ID: 17128611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Selectional processes in causality judgment.
    Shanks DR
    Mem Cognit; 1989 Jan; 17(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 2913454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Recursive retrospective revaluation of causal judgments.
    Macho S; Burkart J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Nov; 28(6):1171-86. PubMed ID: 12450340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.