These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Where does attention go when it moves? Spatial properties and locus of the attentional repulsion effect. Kosovicheva AA; Fortenbaugh FC; Robertson LC J Vis; 2010 Oct; 10(12):33. PubMed ID: 21047765 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The attentional repulsion effect and relative size judgments. Fortenbaugh FC; Sugarman A; Robertson LC; Esterman M Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Feb; 81(2):442-461. PubMed ID: 30488191 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Attention can retrospectively distort visual space. Ono F; Watanabe K Psychol Sci; 2011 Apr; 22(4):472-7. PubMed ID: 21441225 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The path of visual attention. Brown JM; Breitmeyer BG; Leighty KA; Denney HI Acta Psychol (Amst); 2006 Feb; 121(2):199-209. PubMed ID: 16321354 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Global shape coding for motion-defined radial-frequency contours. Rainville SJ; Wilson HR Vision Res; 2005 Nov; 45(25-26):3189-201. PubMed ID: 16099014 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Location and features of instructive spatial cues do not influence the time course of covert shifts of visual spatial attention. Müller MM Biol Psychol; 2008 Mar; 77(3):292-303. PubMed ID: 18083290 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bias corrected double judgment accuracy during spatial attention cueing: unmasked stimuli with non-predictive and semi-predictive cues. Pack W; Klein SA; Carney T Vision Res; 2014 Dec; 105():213-25. PubMed ID: 25130410 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Orienting attention to locations in internal representations. Griffin IC; Nobre AC J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Nov; 15(8):1176-94. PubMed ID: 14709235 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. "Phase capture" in the perception of interpolated shape: cue combination and the influence function. Levi DM; Wing-Hong Li R; Klein SA Vision Res; 2003 Sep; 43(21):2233-43. PubMed ID: 12885377 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Depth spreading through empty space induced by sparse disparity cues. Li X; Huang AE; Altschuler EL; Tyler CW J Vis; 2013 Aug; 13(10):. PubMed ID: 23946433 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Familiar shapes attract attention in figure-ground displays. Nelson RA; Palmer SE Percept Psychophys; 2007 Apr; 69(3):382-92. PubMed ID: 17672426 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Object-based spatial attention when objects have sufficient depth cues. Takeya R; Kasai T J Vis; 2015; 15(13):16. PubMed ID: 26382007 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Action-related objects influence the distribution of visuospatial attention. Roberts KL; Humphreys GW Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Apr; 64(4):669-88. PubMed ID: 21113857 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. High spatial validity is not sufficient to elicit voluntary shifts of attention. Pauszek JR; Gibson BS Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Oct; 78(7):2110-23. PubMed ID: 27044388 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Shifting attention between objects. Iani C; Nicoletti R; Rubichi S; Umiltà C Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2001 Mar; 11(1):157-64. PubMed ID: 11240118 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Changes in the distribution of sustained attention alter the perceived structure of visual space. Fortenbaugh FC; Robertson LC; Esterman M Vision Res; 2017 Feb; 131():26-36. PubMed ID: 28025055 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The disengage deficit in hemispatial neglect is restricted to between-object shifts and is abolished by prism adaptation. Schindler I; McIntosh RD; Cassidy TP; Birchall D; Benson V; Ietswaart M; Milner AD Exp Brain Res; 2009 Jan; 192(3):499-510. PubMed ID: 18854994 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]