These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2132796)
1. Is there an auditory analogue to Fechner's paradox in binaural loudness perception? Hübner R Arch Psychol (Frankf); 1990; 142(3):157-65. PubMed ID: 2132796 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Experiments with Fechner's paradox of binocular brightness]. Irtel H Z Exp Angew Psychol; 1986; 33(3):413-22. PubMed ID: 3751162 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [A dynamic model of loudness adaptation]. Hübner R Z Psychol Z Angew Psychol; 1989; 197(1):97-107. PubMed ID: 2568038 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A nonlinear systems approach to Fechner's paradox. Gregson RA Biol Cybern; 1989; 61(2):129-38. PubMed ID: 2742917 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Probability distributions of interaural phase and level differences in binaural detection stimuli. Zurek PM J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Oct; 90(4 Pt 1):1927-32. PubMed ID: 1960286 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Binaural summation after learning psychophysical functions for loudness. Marks LE; Galanter E; Baird JC Percept Psychophys; 1995 Nov; 57(8):1209-16. PubMed ID: 8539096 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Models of the effects of threshold on loudness growth and summation. Humes LE; Jesteadt W J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Oct; 90(4 Pt 1):1933-43. PubMed ID: 1960287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Binaural and temporal integration of the loudness of tones and noises. Algom D; Rubin A; Cohen-Raz L Percept Psychophys; 1989 Aug; 46(2):155-66. PubMed ID: 2762103 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Perception of musical stimuli by the dichotic listening test--studies on primary school girls of the chorus group]. Tasaki H; Watanabe S; Hojo K; Sato T No To Shinkei; 1983 Jun; 35(6):611-8. PubMed ID: 6626383 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Forms of binaural summation and the implications of individual variability for binaural hearing aids. Haggard MP; Hall JW Scand Audiol Suppl; 1982; 15():47-63. PubMed ID: 6287568 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of target-masker similarity on across-ear interference in a dichotic cocktail-party listening task. Brungart DS; Simpson BD J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Sep; 122(3):1724. PubMed ID: 17927432 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The problem of front-back localization in binaural hearing. Weinrich S Scand Audiol Suppl; 1982; 15():135-45. PubMed ID: 6955921 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Right hemisphere specialization for intensity discrimination of musical and speech sounds. Brancucci A; Babiloni C; Rossini PM; Romani GL Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(13):1916-23. PubMed ID: 16168732 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Four triggering factors in loudness adaptation. Weiler EM; Gold LS; Sandman DE; Warm JS J Gen Psychol; 1992 Oct; 119(4):325-34. PubMed ID: 1491237 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]