BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21327973)

  • 21. Accurate segmentation of the breast region from digitized mammograms.
    Ojala T; Näppi J; Nevalainen O
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2001; 25(1):47-59. PubMed ID: 11120407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Computerized nipple identification for multiple image analysis in computer-aided diagnosis.
    Zhou C; Chan HP; Paramagul C; Roubidoux MA; Sahiner B; Hadjiiski LM; Petrick N
    Med Phys; 2004 Oct; 31(10):2871-82. PubMed ID: 15543797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Fully automated breast boundary and pectoral muscle segmentation in mammograms.
    Rampun A; Morrow PJ; Scotney BW; Winder J
    Artif Intell Med; 2017 Jun; 79():28-41. PubMed ID: 28606722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Automatic left ventricle segmentation in cardiac MRI using topological stable-state thresholding and region restricted dynamic programming.
    Liu H; Hu H; Xu X; Song E
    Acad Radiol; 2012 Jun; 19(6):723-31. PubMed ID: 22465463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Location of mammograms ROI's and reduction of false-positive.
    Salazar-Licea LA; Pedraza-Ortega JC; Pastrana-Palma A; Aceves-Fernandez MA
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2017 May; 143():97-111. PubMed ID: 28391823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Identification and segmentation of obscure pectoral muscle in mediolateral oblique mammograms.
    Wei CH; Gwo CY; Huang PJ
    Br J Radiol; 2016 Jun; 89(1062):20150802. PubMed ID: 27043966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Mammogram segmentation using multi-atlas deformable registration.
    Sharma MK; Jas M; Karale V; Sadhu A; Mukhopadhyay S
    Comput Biol Med; 2019 Jul; 110():244-253. PubMed ID: 31233970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Review of recent advances in segmentation of the breast boundary and the pectoral muscle in mammograms.
    Mustra M; Grgic M; Rangayyan RM
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2016 Jul; 54(7):1003-24. PubMed ID: 26546074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A novel segmentation method for breast ultrasound images based on neutrosophic l-means clustering.
    Shan J; Cheng HD; Wang Y
    Med Phys; 2012 Sep; 39(9):5669-82. PubMed ID: 22957633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Deep Learning Computer-Aided Diagnosis for Breast Lesion in Digital Mammogram.
    Al-Antari MA; Al-Masni MA; Kim TS
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2020; 1213():59-72. PubMed ID: 32030663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A fuzzy c-means (FCM)-based approach for computerized segmentation of breast lesions in dynamic contrast-enhanced MR images.
    Chen W; Giger ML; Bick U
    Acad Radiol; 2006 Jan; 13(1):63-72. PubMed ID: 16399033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. ACCOMP: Augmented cell competition algorithm for breast lesion demarcation in sonography.
    Cheng JZ; Chou YH; Huang CS; Chang YC; Tiu CM; Yeh FC; Chen KW; Tsou CH; Chen CM
    Med Phys; 2010 Dec; 37(12):6240-52. PubMed ID: 21302781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Segmentation of malignant lesions in 3D breast ultrasound using a depth-dependent model.
    Tan T; Gubern-Mérida A; Borelli C; Manniesing R; van Zelst J; Wang L; Zhang W; Platel B; Mann RM; Karssemeijer N
    Med Phys; 2016 Jul; 43(7):4074. PubMed ID: 27370126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Geometry-Based Pectoral Muscle Segmentation From MLO Mammogram Views.
    Taghanaki SA; Liu Y; Miles B; Hamarneh G
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2017 Nov; 64(11):2662-2671. PubMed ID: 28129144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Mass segmentation using a combined method for cancer detection.
    Liu J; Chen J; Liu X; Chun L; Tang J; Deng Y
    BMC Syst Biol; 2011; 5 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S6. PubMed ID: 22784625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Individual tooth region segmentation using modified watershed algorithm with morphological characteristic.
    Na SD; Lee G; Lee JH; Kim MN
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2014; 24(6):3303-9. PubMed ID: 25227040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Automatic detection of breast border and nipple in digital mammograms.
    Méndez AJ; Tahoces PG; Lado MJ; Souto M; Correa JL; Vidal JJ
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 1996 May; 49(3):253-62. PubMed ID: 8800610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Globally supported radial basis function based collocation method for evolution of level set in mass segmentation using mammograms.
    Kashyap KL; Bajpai MK; Khanna P
    Comput Biol Med; 2017 Aug; 87():22-37. PubMed ID: 28549292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Using computer-extracted image features for modeling of error-making patterns in detection of mammographic masses among radiology residents.
    Zhang J; Lo JY; Kuzmiak CM; Ghate SV; Yoon SC; Mazurowski MA
    Med Phys; 2014 Sep; 41(9):091907. PubMed ID: 25186394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Detection of masses in mammograms via statistically based enhancement, multilevel-thresholding segmentation, and region selection.
    Rojas Domínguez A; Nandi AK
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2008 Jun; 32(4):304-15. PubMed ID: 18358699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.