144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21327973)
41. Marker-based watershed transform method for fully automatic mandibular segmentation from CBCT images.
Fan Y; Beare R; Matthews H; Schneider P; Kilpatrick N; Clement J; Claes P; Penington A; Adamson C
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2019 Feb; 48(2):20180261. PubMed ID: 30379569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Correlative feature analysis on FFDM.
Yuan Y; Giger ML; Li H; Sennett C
Med Phys; 2008 Dec; 35(12):5490-500. PubMed ID: 19175108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. A hierarchical pipeline for breast boundary segmentation and calcification detection in mammograms.
Shi P; Zhong J; Rampun A; Wang H
Comput Biol Med; 2018 May; 96():178-188. PubMed ID: 29597143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Automated and effective content-based image retrieval for digital mammography.
Singh VP; Srivastava S; Srivastava R
J Xray Sci Technol; 2018; 26(1):29-49. PubMed ID: 29480232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Automatic segmentation of tumors in B-Mode breast ultrasound images using information gain based neutrosophic clustering.
Lal M; Kaur L; Gupta S
J Xray Sci Technol; 2018; 26(2):209-225. PubMed ID: 29154313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. A novel automatic suspicious mass regions identification using Havrda & Charvat entropy and Otsu's N thresholding.
Kurt B; Nabiyev VV; Turhan K
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2014 May; 114(3):349-60. PubMed ID: 24681199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Computerized image analysis: texture-field orientation method for pectoral muscle identification on MLO-view mammograms.
Zhou C; Wei J; Chan HP; Paramagul C; Hadjiiski LM; Sahiner B; Douglas JA
Med Phys; 2010 May; 37(5):2289-99. PubMed ID: 20527563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Automatic diagnosis of mammographic abnormalities based on hybrid features with learning classifier.
Singh WJ; Nagarajan B
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2013; 16(7):758-67. PubMed ID: 22224592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Fully automated gradient based breast boundary detection for digitized X-ray mammograms.
Kus P; Karagoz I
Comput Biol Med; 2012 Jan; 42(1):75-82. PubMed ID: 22118773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Mesh-free based variational level set evolution for breast region segmentation and abnormality detection using mammograms.
Kashyap KL; Bajpai MK; Khanna P; Giakos G
Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2018 Jan; 34(1):. PubMed ID: 28603939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Automated seeded lesion segmentation on digital mammograms.
Kupinski MA; Giger ML
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1998 Aug; 17(4):510-7. PubMed ID: 9845307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. A Method for Microcalcifications Detection in Breast Mammograms.
Alasadi AH; Al-Saedi AK
J Med Syst; 2017 Apr; 41(4):68. PubMed ID: 28284000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Aiding the Digital Mammogram for Detecting the Breast Cancer Using Shearlet Transform and Neural Network.
P S; R T
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2018 Sep; 19(9):2665-2671. PubMed ID: 30256567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Automated segmentation of digitized mammograms.
Bick U; Giger ML; Schmidt RA; Nishikawa RM; Wolverton DE; Doi K
Acad Radiol; 1995 Jan; 2(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 9419517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Comparison of similarity measures for the task of template matching of masses on serial mammograms.
Filev P; Hadjiiski L; Sahiner B; Chan HP; Helvie MA
Med Phys; 2005 Feb; 32(2):515-29. PubMed ID: 15789598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. A fully automatic algorithm for segmentation of the breasts in DCE-MR images.
Giannini V; Vignati A; Morra L; Persano D; Brizzi D; Carbonaro L; Bert A; Sardanelli F; Regge D
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2010; 2010():3146-9. PubMed ID: 21096592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. A contrast enhancement method for improving the segmentation of breast lesions on ultrasonography.
Flores WG; Pereira WC
Comput Biol Med; 2017 Jan; 80():14-23. PubMed ID: 27875741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Classification-driven watershed segmentation.
Levner I; Zhang H
IEEE Trans Image Process; 2007 May; 16(5):1437-45. PubMed ID: 17491471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. A New Breast Border Extraction and Contrast Enhancement Technique with Digital Mammogram Images for Improved Detection of Breast Cancer.
Hazarika M; Mahanta LB
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2018 Aug; 19(8):2141-2148. PubMed ID: 30139217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Deformable mapping technique to correlate lesions in digital breast tomosynthesis and automated breast ultrasound images.
Green CA; Goodsitt MM; Brock KK; Davis CL; Larson ED; Lau JH; Carson PL
Med Phys; 2018 Oct; 45(10):4402-4417. PubMed ID: 30066340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
