These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21328172)

  • 1. [Techniques of intraocular pressure measurement].
    Neuburger M; Rosentreter A; Dietlein TS; Jordan JF
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2011 Feb; 228(2):118-24. PubMed ID: 21328172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [The effect of central corneal thickness on tonometry].
    Böhm AG
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2011 Feb; 228(2):114-7. PubMed ID: 21328171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Intraocular pressure measurement precision with the Goldmann applanation, dynamic contour, and ocular response analyzer tonometers.
    Kotecha A; White E; Schlottmann PG; Garway-Heath DF
    Ophthalmology; 2010 Apr; 117(4):730-7. PubMed ID: 20122737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis on tonometry as measured by dynamic contour tonometry, ocular response analyzer, and Goldmann tonometry in glaucomatous eyes.
    Hager A; Loge K; Schroeder B; Füllhas MO; Wiegand W
    J Glaucoma; 2008 Aug; 17(5):361-5. PubMed ID: 18703945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Reproducibility of dynamic contour tonometry. Comparison with TonoPenXL and Goldmann applanation tonometry - a clinical study on 323 normal eyes].
    Viestenz A; Langenbucher A; Viestenz A
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2006 Oct; 223(10):813-9. PubMed ID: 17063423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Factors influencing applanation tonometry - a practical approach].
    Rosentreter A; Neuburger M; Jordan JF; Schild AM; Dietlein TS
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2011 Feb; 228(2):109-13. PubMed ID: 21328170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Corneal thickness- and age-related biomechanical properties of the cornea measured with the ocular response analyzer.
    Kotecha A; Elsheikh A; Roberts CR; Zhu H; Garway-Heath DF
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Dec; 47(12):5337-47. PubMed ID: 17122122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [The role of pachymetry in routine glaucoma diagnosis].
    von Eicken J; Kohlhaas M; Stodtmeister R; Höh H
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2006 Feb; 223(2):117-30. PubMed ID: 16485223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry in glaucoma practice.
    Halkiadakis I; Patsea E; Chatzimichali K; Skouriotis S; Chalkidou S; Amariotakis G; Papakonstadinou D; Theodossiadis G; Amariotakis A; Georgopoulos G
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2009 May; 87(3):323-8. PubMed ID: 18631335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The relationship between diurnal variations in intraocular pressure measurements and central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis.
    Kotecha A; Crabb DP; Spratt A; Garway-Heath DF
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Sep; 50(9):4229-36. PubMed ID: 19407025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [What to do if the intraocular pressure measurement does not appear reliable].
    Hamard P
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 2010 Apr; 33(4):279-84. PubMed ID: 20347507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of intraocular pressure measured by Pascal dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry.
    Ku JY; Danesh-Meyer HV; Craig JP; Gamble GD; McGhee CN
    Eye (Lond); 2006 Feb; 20(2):191-8. PubMed ID: 15803173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Applanation tonometry in "normal" patients and patients after LASIK].
    Kohlhaas M; Spörl E; Böhm AG; Pollack K; Sandner D; Pillunat LE
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2005 Oct; 222(10):823-6. PubMed ID: 16240277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessment of true intraocular pressure: the gap between theory and practical data.
    Chihara E
    Surv Ophthalmol; 2008; 53(3):203-18. PubMed ID: 18501267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical comparison of pascal dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry in asymmetric open-angle glaucoma.
    Sullivan-Mee M; Halverson KD; Qualls C
    J Glaucoma; 2007 Dec; 16(8):694-9. PubMed ID: 18091457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of corneal structure, corneal responsiveness, and other ocular parameters on tonometric measurement of intraocular pressure.
    Broman AT; Congdon NG; Bandeen-Roche K; Quigley HA
    J Glaucoma; 2007; 16(7):581-8. PubMed ID: 18091174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The relative effects of corneal thickness and age on Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry.
    Kotecha A; White ET; Shewry JM; Garway-Heath DF
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2005 Dec; 89(12):1572-5. PubMed ID: 16299132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in healthy and glaucomatous eyes.
    Ceruti P; Morbio R; Marraffa M; Marchini G
    Eye (Lond); 2009 Feb; 23(2):262-9. PubMed ID: 18219335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dynamic contour tonometry (DCT) versus non-contact tonometry (NCT): a comparison study.
    Burvenich H; Burvenich E; Vincent C
    Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol; 2005; (298):63-9. PubMed ID: 16422223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Measuring intraocular pressure-adjustments for corneal thickness and new technologies.
    Herndon LW
    Curr Opin Ophthalmol; 2006 Apr; 17(2):115-9. PubMed ID: 16552245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.