These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21328404)

  • 1. Pharmacophore alignment search tool: influence of the third dimension on text-based similarity searching.
    Hähnke V; Klenner A; Rippmann F; Schneider G
    J Comput Chem; 2011 Jun; 32(8):1618-34. PubMed ID: 21328404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pharmacophore alignment search tool: Influence of canonical atom labeling on similarity searching.
    Hähnke V; Rupp M; Krier M; Rippmann F; Schneider G
    J Comput Chem; 2010 Nov; 31(15):2810-26. PubMed ID: 20839306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. PhAST: pharmacophore alignment search tool.
    Hähnke V; Hofmann B; Grgat T; Proschak E; Steinhilber D; Schneider G
    J Comput Chem; 2009 Apr; 30(5):761-71. PubMed ID: 18727161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pharmacophore alignment search tool: influence of scoring systems on text-based similarity searching.
    Hähnke V; Schneider G
    J Comput Chem; 2011 Jun; 32(8):1635-47. PubMed ID: 21328403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fuzzy pharmacophore models from molecular alignments for correlation-vector-based virtual screening.
    Renner S; Schneider G
    J Med Chem; 2004 Sep; 47(19):4653-64. PubMed ID: 15341481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Improving VEGFR-2 docking-based screening by pharmacophore postfiltering and similarity search postprocessing.
    Planesas JM; Claramunt RM; Teixidó J; Borrell JI; Pérez-Nueno VI
    J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Apr; 51(4):777-87. PubMed ID: 21417262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Virtual drug screen schema based on multiview similarity integration and ranking aggregation.
    Kang H; Sheng Z; Zhu R; Huang Q; Liu Q; Cao Z
    J Chem Inf Model; 2012 Mar; 52(3):834-43. PubMed ID: 22332590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative evaluation of 3D virtual ligand screening methods: impact of the molecular alignment on enrichment.
    Giganti D; Guillemain H; Spadoni JL; Nilges M; Zagury JF; Montes M
    J Chem Inf Model; 2010 Jun; 50(6):992-1004. PubMed ID: 20527883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Unconventional 2D shape similarity method affords comparable enrichment as a 3D shape method in virtual screening experiments.
    Ebalunode JO; Zheng W
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Jun; 49(6):1313-20. PubMed ID: 19480404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. SHAFTS: a hybrid approach for 3D molecular similarity calculation. 1. Method and assessment of virtual screening.
    Liu X; Jiang H; Li H
    J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Sep; 51(9):2372-85. PubMed ID: 21819157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Novel technologies for virtual screening.
    Lengauer T; Lemmen C; Rarey M; Zimmermann M
    Drug Discov Today; 2004 Jan; 9(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 14761803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. 3D QSAR pharmacophore based virtual screening and molecular docking for identification of potential HSP90 inhibitors.
    Sakkiah S; Thangapandian S; John S; Kwon YJ; Lee KW
    Eur J Med Chem; 2010 Jun; 45(6):2132-40. PubMed ID: 20206418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of conformational flexibility on three-dimensional similarity searching using correlation vectors.
    Renner S; Schwab CH; Gasteiger J; Schneider G
    J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(6):2324-32. PubMed ID: 17125176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Critical comparison of virtual screening methods against the MUV data set.
    Tiikkainen P; Markt P; Wolber G; Kirchmair J; Distinto S; Poso A; Kallioniemi O
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Oct; 49(10):2168-78. PubMed ID: 19799417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ligand-target interaction-based weighting of substructures for virtual screening.
    Crisman TJ; Sisay MT; Bajorath J
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Oct; 48(10):1955-64. PubMed ID: 18821751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A new method for in-silico drug screening and similarity search using molecular dynamics maximum volume overlap (MD-MVO) method.
    Fukunishi Y; Nakamura H
    J Mol Graph Model; 2009 Jan; 27(5):628-36. PubMed ID: 19046907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Application of QSAR and shape pharmacophore modeling approaches for targeted chemical library design.
    Ebalunode JO; Zheng W; Tropsha A
    Methods Mol Biol; 2011; 685():111-33. PubMed ID: 20981521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Development of a fingerprint reduction approach for Bayesian similarity searching based on Kullback-Leibler divergence analysis.
    Nisius B; Vogt M; Bajorath J
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Jun; 49(6):1347-58. PubMed ID: 19480403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. PZIM: a method for similarity searching using atom environments and 2D alignment.
    Berglund AE; Head RD
    J Chem Inf Model; 2010 Oct; 50(10):1790-5. PubMed ID: 20886834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Similarity search profiles as a diagnostic tool for the analysis of virtual screening calculations.
    Xue L; Godden JW; Stahura FL; Bajorath J
    J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2004; 44(4):1275-81. PubMed ID: 15272835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.