These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21328604)

  • 1. Confidence scores for prediction models.
    Gerds TA; van de Wiel MA
    Biom J; 2011 Mar; 53(2):259-74. PubMed ID: 21328604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mixture classification model based on clinical markers for breast cancer prognosis.
    Zeng T; Liu J
    Artif Intell Med; 2010; 48(2-3):129-37. PubMed ID: 20005686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Meta-analysis of the Italian studies on short-term effects of air pollution].
    Biggeri A; Bellini P; Terracini B;
    Epidemiol Prev; 2001; 25(2 Suppl):1-71. PubMed ID: 11515188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Alternative methods to evaluate trial level surrogacy.
    Abrahantes JC; Shkedy Z; Molenberghs G
    Clin Trials; 2008; 5(3):194-208. PubMed ID: 18559408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Estimation of prediction error for survival models.
    Lawless JF; Yuan Y
    Stat Med; 2010 Jan; 29(2):262-74. PubMed ID: 19882678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ensemble methods for classification of patients for personalized medicine with high-dimensional data.
    Moon H; Ahn H; Kodell RL; Baek S; Lin CJ; Chen JJ
    Artif Intell Med; 2007 Nov; 41(3):197-207. PubMed ID: 17719213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A multi-class predictor based on a probabilistic model: application to gene expression profiling-based diagnosis of thyroid tumors.
    Yukinawa N; Oba S; Kato K; Taniguchi K; Iwao-Koizumi K; Tamaki Y; Noguchi S; Ishii S
    BMC Genomics; 2006 Jul; 7():190. PubMed ID: 16872506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Error bounds for data-driven models of dynamical systems.
    Oleng' NO; Gribok A; Reifman J
    Comput Biol Med; 2007 May; 37(5):670-9. PubMed ID: 16895726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Regression equations in clinical neuropsychology: an evaluation of statistical methods for comparing predicted and obtained scores.
    Crawford JR; Howell DC
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 1998 Oct; 20(5):755-62. PubMed ID: 10079050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cancer risk prediction models: a workshop on development, evaluation, and application.
    Freedman AN; Seminara D; Gail MH; Hartge P; Colditz GA; Ballard-Barbash R; Pfeiffer RM
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2005 May; 97(10):715-23. PubMed ID: 15900041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Investigating the effect of modeling single-vehicle and multi-vehicle crashes separately on confidence intervals of Poisson-gamma models.
    Geedipally SR; Lord D
    Accid Anal Prev; 2010 Jul; 42(4):1273-82. PubMed ID: 20441842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluating heterogeneity in indoor and outdoor air pollution using land-use regression and constrained factor analysis.
    Levy JI; Clougherty JE; Baxter LK; Houseman EA; Paciorek CJ;
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2010 Dec; (152):5-80; discussion 81-91. PubMed ID: 21409949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An overview of techniques for linking high-dimensional molecular data to time-to-event endpoints by risk prediction models.
    Binder H; Porzelius C; Schumacher M
    Biom J; 2011 Mar; 53(2):170-89. PubMed ID: 21328602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Recursive partitioning analysis of prognostic factors for survival in patients with advanced cancer.
    Chow E; Abdolell M; Panzarella T; Harris K; Bezjak A; Warde P; Tannock I
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2009 Mar; 73(4):1169-76. PubMed ID: 18938045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Adapting prediction error estimates for biased complexity selection in high-dimensional bootstrap samples.
    Binder H; Schumacher M
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2008; 7(1):Article12. PubMed ID: 18384265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An updated catalog of prostate cancer predictive tools.
    Shariat SF; Karakiewicz PI; Roehrborn CG; Kattan MW
    Cancer; 2008 Dec; 113(11):3075-99. PubMed ID: 18823041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Laboratory and non-laboratory-based risk prediction models for secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease: the LIPID study.
    Cui J; Forbes A; Kirby A; Simes J; Tonkin A
    Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil; 2009 Dec; 16(6):660-8. PubMed ID: 19738473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect size, confidence interval and statistical significance: a practical guide for biologists.
    Nakagawa S; Cuthill IC
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2007 Nov; 82(4):591-605. PubMed ID: 17944619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prediction of Lynch syndrome in consecutive patients with colorectal cancer.
    Green RC; Parfrey PS; Woods MO; Younghusband HB
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2009 Mar; 101(5):331-40. PubMed ID: 19244167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prognostic factors in patients with advanced cancer: use of the patient-generated subjective global assessment in survival prediction.
    Martin L; Watanabe S; Fainsinger R; Lau F; Ghosh S; Quan H; Atkins M; Fassbender K; Downing GM; Baracos V
    J Clin Oncol; 2010 Oct; 28(28):4376-83. PubMed ID: 20805456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.