These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21328867)

  • 1. [Critical review of a paper addressing the assessment of a diagnostic procedure].
    François P; Labarère J
    Rev Prat; 2010 Nov; 60(9):1278-80. PubMed ID: 21328867
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. There is nothing staid about STARD: progress in the reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies.
    Johnston KC; Holloway RG
    Neurology; 2006 Sep; 67(5):740-1. PubMed ID: 16966532
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Toward complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy. The STARD initiative.
    Bossuyt PM; Reitsma JB; Bruns DE; Gatsonis CA; Glasziou PP; Irwig LM; Lijmer JG; Moher D; Rennie D; de Vet HC;
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2003 Jan; 119(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 12520693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Do we need a checklist for reporting the results of diagnostic test evaluations? The STARD proposal.
    Gatsonis C
    Acad Radiol; 2003 Jun; 10(6):599-600. PubMed ID: 12809411
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. General radiologists' diagnostic accuracy: incomplete presentation of data casts doubt on study's conclusions.
    Zivian MT; Gershater R; Erly WK; Ashdown BC; Lucio RW
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Feb; 184(2):697-9. PubMed ID: 15671405
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [The evaluation of the methodology in studies about diagnostic test in "Anales Española de Pediatria"].
    González de Dios J
    An Esp Pediatr; 1999 Nov; 51(5):461-8. PubMed ID: 10652795
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Diagnostic studies should follow international guidelines. Planning and evaluation requires theoretical and practical considerations].
    Björk J; Hellström M; Mejare I; Nyman U
    Lakartidningen; 2013 Mar 13-19; 110(11):562-5. PubMed ID: 23596850
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The quality of diagnostic accuracy studies since the STARD statement: has it improved?
    Smidt N; Rutjes AW; van der Windt DA; Ostelo RW; Bossuyt PM; Reitsma JB; Bouter LM; de Vet HC
    Neurology; 2006 Sep; 67(5):792-7. PubMed ID: 16966539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [How to use the STARD statement and the QUADAS-2 tool?].
    Cohen J; Bossuyt P; Levy C; Chalumeau M; Martinot A; Launay E
    Arch Pediatr; 2015 May; 22(5 Suppl 1):190-1. PubMed ID: 26112586
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative.
    Jones R
    Fam Pract; 2004 Feb; 21(1):3. PubMed ID: 14760035
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Better reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy.
    Pai M; Sharma S
    Indian J Med Microbiol; 2005 Oct; 23(4):210-3. PubMed ID: 16327114
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Improving reports of studies of diagnostic tests: the STARD initiative.
    Rennie D
    JAMA; 2003 Jan; 289(1):89-90. PubMed ID: 12503983
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. STARD statement: still room for improvement in the reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies.
    Bossuyt PM
    Radiology; 2008 Sep; 248(3):713-4. PubMed ID: 18710968
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [The Danish clinical guidelines (Klaringsrapporter, 1996-2001: Insufficient evidence presented for the diagnostic accuracy of recommended clinical-biochemical tests].
    Jørgensen PE; Madsen JS; Jørgensen LG; Larsen TB; Hilden J; Magid E
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2004 Apr; 166(18):1667-70. PubMed ID: 15174403
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Guidelines for reporting health care research: advancing the clarity and transparency of scientific reporting.
    Moher D
    Can J Anaesth; 2009 Feb; 56(2):96-101. PubMed ID: 19247756
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. PRISMA.
    Blegen MA
    Nurs Res; 2010; 59(4):233. PubMed ID: 20585220
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical research design and reporting: always room for improvement!
    Heddle NM; Ness P
    Transfusion; 2007 Jan; 47(1):2-3. PubMed ID: 17207221
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Evaluation of diagnostic methods].
    Doyon F; Hill C
    J Radiol; 2001 Feb; 82(2):117-25. PubMed ID: 11428206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Lessons from a life in research: getting things straight.
    Thompson JC
    Pharos Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Med Soc; 2002; 65(3):20-5. PubMed ID: 12298403
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The ARRIVE guidelines, a welcome improvement to standards for reporting animal research.
    Danos O; Davies K; Lehn P; Mulligan R
    J Gene Med; 2010 Jul; 12(7):559-60. PubMed ID: 20603891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.