These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21329105)
1. Reprogenetics and the "parents have always done it" argument. Malmqvist E Hastings Cent Rep; 2011; 41(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 21329105 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Appropriate aims: setting boundaries for reprogenetic technology. Ziker D Duke Law Technol Rev; 2002 Jul; ():E1. PubMed ID: 15709285 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Does bioethics provide answers?: Secular and religious bioethics and our procreative future. Smolin DM Cumberland Law Rev; 2004-2005; 35(3):473-517. PubMed ID: 16715560 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. A not-so-new eugenics. Harris and Savulescu on human enhancement. Sparrow R Hastings Cent Rep; 2011; 41(1):32-42. PubMed ID: 21329104 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Not just for experts: the public debate about reprogenetics in Germany. Braun K Hastings Cent Rep; 2005; 35(3):42-9. PubMed ID: 16092401 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Method, mediations, and the moral dimensions of preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Dolgin JL Cumberland Law Rev; 2004-2005; 35(3):519-42. PubMed ID: 16715561 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. An evolving landscape: reproductive genetics, new technologies and health care over the next decade. Aarons J; Aulwes J; Shields W; Galpern E; Shulman LP Contraception; 2008 Dec; 78(6):433-5. PubMed ID: 19014788 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Let parents decide. Handyside A Nature; 2010 Apr; 464(7291):978-9. PubMed ID: 20393539 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The post-humanist embryo: genetic manipulation, assisted reproductive technologies and the Principle of Procreative Beneficence. Güell Pelayo F Cuad Bioet; 2014; 25(85):427-43. PubMed ID: 25684382 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Beneficence, determinism and justice: an engagement with the argument for the genetic selection of intelligence. Birch K Bioethics; 2005 Feb; 19(1):12-28. PubMed ID: 15812970 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Free to Decide: The Positive Moral Right to Reproductive Choice. Johnson T Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 2021; 31(3):303-326. PubMed ID: 34565746 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Harm as the price of liberty? Pre-implantation diagnosis and reproductive freedom. Haker H Ethical Perspect; 2003; 10(3-4):215-23. PubMed ID: 16206463 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. From regenerative medicine to human design: what are we really afraid of? Stock G Free Inq; 2004; 24(4):27-30. PubMed ID: 15835004 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Public goods and procreation. Anomaly J Monash Bioeth Rev; 2014; 32(3-4):172-88. PubMed ID: 25743046 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Perfect Womb: Promoting Equality of (Fetal) Opportunity. Kendal E J Bioeth Inq; 2017 Jun; 14(2):185-194. PubMed ID: 28224271 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]