BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21330165)

  • 1. Rupture length of the sinus membrane after 1.2 mm puncture and surgical sinus elevation: an experimental animal cadaver study.
    Jank S; Kurrek A; Wainwright M; Bek VE; Troedhan A
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Nov; 112(5):568-72. PubMed ID: 21330165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of Conventional Transcrestal Sinus Lift and Ultrasound-Enhanced Transcrestal Hydrodynamic Cavitational Sinus Lift for the Filling of Subantral Space: A Human Cadaver Study.
    Catros S; Montaudon M; Bou C; Da Costa Noble R; Fricain JC; Ella B
    J Oral Implantol; 2015 Dec; 41(6):657-61. PubMed ID: 25232940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A new technique for the transcrestal sinus floor elevation and alveolar ridge augmentation with press-fit bone cylinders: a technical note.
    Draenert GF; Eisenmenger W
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2007; 35(4-5):201-6. PubMed ID: 17582778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Hydrodynamic ultrasonic sinus floor elevation--an experimental study in sheep.
    Troedhan AC; Kurrek A; Wainwright M; Jank S
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 May; 68(5):1125-30. PubMed ID: 20202732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Gel-pressure technique for flapless transcrestal maxillary sinus floor elevation: a preliminary cadaveric study of a new surgical technique.
    Pommer B; Watzek G
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):817-22. PubMed ID: 19865621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of 2 crestal sinus floor lift techniques performed on human cadavers.
    Llopet J; Montaudon M; Guillaud E; Ella B
    Implant Dent; 2014 Oct; 23(5):626-32. PubMed ID: 25192160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of the capability of a new water lift system to reduce the risk of Schneiderian membrane perforation during sinus elevation.
    Bensaha T
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Aug; 40(8):815-20. PubMed ID: 21592728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Transcrestal maxillary sinus augmentation: Summers' versus a piezoelectric technique--an experimental cadaver study.
    Kühl S; Kirmeier R; Platzer S; Bianco N; Jakse N; Payer M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 Jan; 27(1):126-9. PubMed ID: 25682786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of the sinus lift operation by magnetic resonance imaging.
    Senel FC; Duran S; Icten O; Izbudak I; Cizmeci F
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Dec; 44(6):511-4. PubMed ID: 16540215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Sinus floor bone augmentation: implementation of the concept of sinus-lift].
    Lambert F; Lecloux G; Rompen E
    Rev Belge Med Dent (1984); 2009; 64(4):173-84. PubMed ID: 20178169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Schneiderian membrane detachment using transcrestal hydrodynamic ultrasonic cavitational sinus lift: a human cadaver head study and histologic analysis.
    Troedhan A; Kurrek A; Wainwright M; Jank S
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Aug; 72(8):1503.e1-10. PubMed ID: 24746398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Gradual and safe technique for sinus floor elevation using trephines and osteotomes with stops: a cadaveric anatomic study.
    Tilotta F; Lazaroo B; Gaudy JF
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Aug; 106(2):210-6. PubMed ID: 18547840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Osteotomy and membrane elevation during the maxillary sinus augmentation procedure. A comparative study: piezoelectric device vs. conventional rotative instruments.
    Barone A; Santini S; Marconcini S; Giacomelli L; Gherlone E; Covani U
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 May; 19(5):511-5. PubMed ID: 18371101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Massive sinus-lift procedures with beta-tricalcium phosphate: long-term results].
    Meyer C; Chatelain B; Benarroch M; Garnier JF; Ricbourg B; Camponovo T
    Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac; 2009 Apr; 110(2):69-75. PubMed ID: 19171358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Piezoelectric internal sinus elevation (PISE) technique: a new method for internal sinus elevation.
    Sohn DS; Lee JS; An KM; Choi BJ
    Implant Dent; 2009 Dec; 18(6):458-63. PubMed ID: 20009598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Porous hydroxyapatite for grafting the maxillary sinus: a comparative histomorphometric study in sheep.
    Haas R; Baron M; Donath K; Zechner W; Watzek G
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(3):337-46. PubMed ID: 12074448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sinus floor augmentation with recombinant human growth and differentiation factor-5 (rhGDF-5): a pilot study in the Goettingen miniature pig comparing autogenous bone and rhGDF-5.
    Gruber RM; Ludwig A; Merten HA; Pippig S; Kramer FJ; Schliephake H
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Feb; 20(2):175-82. PubMed ID: 19077151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Internal sinus manipulation (ISM) procedure: a technical report.
    Yamada JM; Park HJ
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2007 Sep; 9(3):128-35. PubMed ID: 17716256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Endoscopic maxillary sinus lift without vestibular mucosal incision or bone graft.
    Kiyokawa K; Kiyokwa M; Sakaguchi S; Fukaya T; Rikimaru H
    J Craniofac Surg; 2009 Sep; 20(5):1462-7. PubMed ID: 19816279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Maxillary sinus lift for single implant-supported restorations: a clinical study.
    Krennmair G; Krainhöfner M; Schmid-Schwap M; Piehslinger E
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(3):351-8. PubMed ID: 17622000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.