These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21330273)

  • 1. Smoking cues, argument strength, and perceived effectiveness of antismoking PSAs.
    Lee S; Cappella JN; Lerman C; Strasser AA
    Nicotine Tob Res; 2011 Apr; 13(4):282-90. PubMed ID: 21330273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Distraction Effects of Smoking Cues in Antismoking Messages: Examining Resource Allocation to Message Processing as a Function of Smoking Cues and Argument Strength.
    Lee S; Cappella JN
    Media Psychol; 2013; 16(2):154-176. PubMed ID: 25477766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The influence of liking for antismoking PSAs on adolescents' smoking-related behavioral intentions.
    Nan X; Zhao X
    Health Commun; 2010 Jul; 25(5):459-69. PubMed ID: 20677049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. No untoward effects of smoking cues in anti-smoking public service announcements.
    Falcone M; Lerman C; Cappella JN; Sanborn P; Jepson C; Strasser AA
    Drug Alcohol Depend; 2013 Nov; 133(1):279-82. PubMed ID: 23742844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Uncovering the most effective active ingredients of antismoking public service announcements: the role of actor and message characteristics.
    Shadel WG; Fryer CS; Tharp-Taylor S
    Nicotine Tob Res; 2009 May; 11(5):547-52. PubMed ID: 19372574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The impact of smoking cues in antismoking messages among intermittent and light smokers.
    Xu J
    Psychol Health; 2017 Jan; 32(1):1-18. PubMed ID: 27616462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of smoking cues in antismoking advertisements on smoking urge and psychophysiological reactions.
    Kang Y; Cappella JN; Strasser AA; Lerman C
    Nicotine Tob Res; 2009 Mar; 11(3):254-61. PubMed ID: 19251767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of smoking cues and argument strength of antismoking advertisements on former smokers' self-efficacy, attitude, and intention to refrain from smoking.
    Lee S; Cappella JN; Lerman C; Strasser AA
    Nicotine Tob Res; 2013 Feb; 15(2):527-33. PubMed ID: 22949578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Association of BDNF and COMT genotypes with cognitive processing of anti-smoking PSAs.
    Falcone M; Jepson C; Sanborn P; Cappella JN; Lerman C; Strasser AA
    Genes Brain Behav; 2011 Nov; 10(8):862-7. PubMed ID: 21883922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Priming effect of antismoking PSAs on smoking behaviour: a pilot study.
    Harris JL; Pierce M; Bargh JA
    Tob Control; 2014 Jul; 23(4):285-90. PubMed ID: 23322312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Smoke signals: A study of the neurophysiological reaction of smokers and non-smokers to smoking cues inserted into antismoking public service announcements.
    Inguscio BMS; Cartocci G; Modica E; Rossi D; Martinez-Levy AC; Cherubino P; Tamborra L; Babiloni F
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2021 Sep; 167():22-29. PubMed ID: 34175349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Neurophysiological Profile of Antismoking Campaigns.
    Modica E; Rossi D; Cartocci G; Perrotta D; Di Feo P; Mancini M; Aricò P; Inguscio BMS; Babiloni F
    Comput Intell Neurosci; 2018; 2018():9721561. PubMed ID: 30327667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effectiveness of empathy- versus fear-arousing antismoking PSAs.
    Shen L
    Health Commun; 2011; 26(5):404-15. PubMed ID: 21409669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Tobacco industry manipulation messages in anti-smoking public service announcements: the effect of explicitly versus implicitly delivering messages.
    Shadel WG; Fryer CS; Tharp-Taylor S
    Addict Behav; 2010 May; 35(5):526-9. PubMed ID: 20071100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Testing the Effect of Vapor in ENDS Public Service Announcements on Current Smokers and ENDS Users' Psychophysiological Responses and Smoking and Vaping Urge.
    Sanders-Jackson A; Clayton RB; Tan ASL; Yie K
    J Health Commun; 2019; 24(4):413-421. PubMed ID: 31256742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Experimental evaluation of antitobacco PSAs: effects of message content and format on physiological and behavioral outcomes.
    Strasser AA; Cappella JN; Jepson C; Fishbein M; Tang KZ; Han E; Lerman C
    Nicotine Tob Res; 2009 Mar; 11(3):293-302. PubMed ID: 19246628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Association of Exposure to Court-Ordered Tobacco Industry Antismoking Advertisements With Intentions and Attempts to Quit Smoking Among US Adults.
    Chido-Amajuoyi OG; Agaku I; Mantey DS; Yu RK; Shete S
    JAMA Netw Open; 2020 Jul; 3(7):e209504. PubMed ID: 32633765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of Character-Audience Similarity on the Perceived Effectiveness of Antismoking PSAs via Engagement.
    Kim M; Shi R; Cappella JN
    Health Commun; 2016 Oct; 31(10):1193-204. PubMed ID: 26891148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Targeting anti-smoking messages: does audience race matter?
    Tharp-Taylor S; Fryer CS; Shadel WG
    Addict Behav; 2012 Jul; 37(7):844-7. PubMed ID: 22481049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The influence of antismoking television advertisements on cessation by race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and mental health status.
    Nonnemaker JM; Allen JA; Davis KC; Kamyab K; Duke JC; Farrelly MC
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(7):e102943. PubMed ID: 25033449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.