BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

2222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21330339)

  • 1. Updating and validating the Charlson comorbidity index and score for risk adjustment in hospital discharge abstracts using data from 6 countries.
    Quan H; Li B; Couris CM; Fushimi K; Graham P; Hider P; Januel JM; Sundararajan V
    Am J Epidemiol; 2011 Mar; 173(6):676-82. PubMed ID: 21330339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Developing an adapted Charlson comorbidity index for ischemic stroke outcome studies.
    Hall RE; Porter J; Quan H; Reeves MJ
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2019 Dec; 19(1):930. PubMed ID: 31796024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Validity of information on comorbidity derived rom ICD-9-CCM administrative data.
    Quan H; Parsons GA; Ghali WA
    Med Care; 2002 Aug; 40(8):675-85. PubMed ID: 12187181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Implementation of ICD-10 in Canada: how has it impacted coded hospital discharge data?
    Walker RL; Hennessy DA; Johansen H; Sambell C; Lix L; Quan H
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2012 Jun; 12():149. PubMed ID: 22682405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Use of a self-report-generated Charlson Comorbidity Index for predicting mortality.
    Chaudhry S; Jin L; Meltzer D
    Med Care; 2005 Jun; 43(6):607-15. PubMed ID: 15908856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Development and testing of a systemic lupus-specific risk adjustment index for in-hospital mortality.
    Ward MM
    J Rheumatol; 2000 Jun; 27(6):1408-13. PubMed ID: 10852262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Australian Injury Comorbidity Index to Predict Mortality.
    Fernando DT; Berecki-Gisolf J; Newstead S; Ansari Z
    Ann Emerg Med; 2020 Mar; 75(3):339-353. PubMed ID: 31955941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Best Use of the Charlson Comorbidity Index With Electronic Health Care Database to Predict Mortality.
    Bannay A; Chaignot C; Blotière PO; Basson M; Weill A; Ricordeau P; Alla F
    Med Care; 2016 Feb; 54(2):188-94. PubMed ID: 26683778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Development of an epilepsy-specific risk adjustment comorbidity index.
    St Germaine-Smith C; Liu M; Quan H; Wiebe S; Jette N
    Epilepsia; 2011 Dec; 52(12):2161-7. PubMed ID: 22004000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A systematic review of the Charlson comorbidity index using Canadian administrative databases: a perspective on risk adjustment in critical care research.
    Needham DM; Scales DC; Laupacis A; Pronovost PJ
    J Crit Care; 2005 Mar; 20(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 16015512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Adapting the Charlson Comorbidity Index for use in patients with ESRD.
    Hemmelgarn BR; Manns BJ; Quan H; Ghali WA
    Am J Kidney Dis; 2003 Jul; 42(1):125-32. PubMed ID: 12830464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Risk adjustment performance of Charlson and Elixhauser comorbidities in ICD-9 and ICD-10 administrative databases.
    Li B; Evans D; Faris P; Dean S; Quan H
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2008 Jan; 8():12. PubMed ID: 18194561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of the Elixhauser and Charlson/Deyo methods of comorbidity measurement in administrative data.
    Southern DA; Quan H; Ghali WA
    Med Care; 2004 Apr; 42(4):355-60. PubMed ID: 15076812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A new casemix adjustment index for hospital mortality among patients with congestive heart failure.
    Polanczyk CA; Rohde LE; Philbin EA; Di Salvo TG
    Med Care; 1998 Oct; 36(10):1489-99. PubMed ID: 9794342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cross-national comparative performance of three versions of the ICD-10 Charlson index.
    Sundararajan V; Quan H; Halfon P; Fushimi K; Luthi JC; Burnand B; Ghali WA;
    Med Care; 2007 Dec; 45(12):1210-5. PubMed ID: 18007172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparing Charlson and Elixhauser comorbidity indices with different weightings to predict in-hospital mortality: an analysis of national inpatient data.
    Sharma N; Schwendimann R; Endrich O; Ausserhofer D; Simon M
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2021 Jan; 21(1):13. PubMed ID: 33407455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data.
    Quan H; Sundararajan V; Halfon P; Fong A; Burnand B; Luthi JC; Saunders LD; Beck CA; Feasby TE; Ghali WA
    Med Care; 2005 Nov; 43(11):1130-9. PubMed ID: 16224307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Predicting In-Hospital Mortality in Elderly Patients With Cervical Spine Fractures: A Comparison of the Charlson and Elixhauser Comorbidity Measures.
    Menendez ME; Ring D; Harris MB; Cha TD
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Jun; 40(11):809-15. PubMed ID: 25785957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessing measures of comorbidity and functional status for risk adjustment to compare hospital performance for colorectal cancer surgery: a retrospective data-linkage study.
    Dobbins TA; Badgery-Parker T; Currow DC; Young JM
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2015 Jul; 15():55. PubMed ID: 26174550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Categorized diagnoses and procedure records in an administrative database improved mortality prediction.
    Yamana H; Matsui H; Sasabuchi Y; Fushimi K; Yasunaga H
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Sep; 68(9):1028-35. PubMed ID: 25596112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 112.