283 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21330399)
21. Percentage signal recovery derived from MR dynamic susceptibility contrast imaging is useful to differentiate common enhancing malignant lesions of the brain.
Mangla R; Kolar B; Zhu T; Zhong J; Almast J; Ekholm S
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2011; 32(6):1004-10. PubMed ID: 21511863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Differentiation of Glioblastoma and Solitary Brain Metastasis by Gradient of Relative Cerebral Blood Volume in the Peritumoral Brain Zone Derived from Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast Perfusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
She D; Xing Z; Cao D
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2019; 43(1):13-17. PubMed ID: 30015801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Analysis of fractional anisotropy facilitates differentiation of glioblastoma and brain metastases in a clinical setting.
Bette S; Huber T; Wiestler B; Boeckh-Behrens T; Gempt J; Ringel F; Meyer B; Zimmer C; Kirschke JS
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Dec; 85(12):2182-2187. PubMed ID: 27842664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Diffusion tensor imaging discriminates between glioblastoma and cerebral metastases in vivo.
Byrnes TJ; Barrick TR; Bell BA; Clark CA
NMR Biomed; 2011 Jan; 24(1):54-60. PubMed ID: 20665905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Differentiation between glioblastomas and brain metastases and regarding their primary site of malignancy using dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI at 3T.
Askaner K; Rydelius A; Engelholm S; Knutsson L; Lätt J; Abul-Kasim K; Sundgren PC
J Neuroradiol; 2019 Nov; 46(6):367-372. PubMed ID: 30389510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Automated differentiation of glioblastomas from intracranial metastases using 3T MR spectroscopic and perfusion data.
Tsolaki E; Svolos P; Kousi E; Kapsalaki E; Fountas K; Theodorou K; Tsougos I
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2013 Sep; 8(5):751-61. PubMed ID: 23334798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Glioblastomas vs. lymphomas: more diagnostic certainty by using susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI).
Peters S; Knöß N; Wodarg F; Cnyrim C; Jansen O
Rofo; 2012 Aug; 184(8):713-8. PubMed ID: 22618484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Diffusion tensor imaging in glioblastoma multiforme and brain metastases: the role of p, q, L, and fractional anisotropy.
Wang W; Steward CE; Desmond PM
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2009 Jan; 30(1):203-8. PubMed ID: 18842762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy in the distinction of high-grade cerebral gliomas from single metastatic brain tumors.
Server A; Josefsen R; Kulle B; Maehlen J; Schellhorn T; Gadmar Ø; Kumar T; Haakonsen M; Langberg CW; Nakstad PH
Acta Radiol; 2010 Apr; 51(3):316-25. PubMed ID: 20092374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Diagnostic examination performance by using microvascular leakage, cerebral blood volume, and blood flow derived from 3-T dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced perfusion MR imaging in the differentiation of glioblastoma multiforme and brain metastasis.
Server A; Orheim TE; Graff BA; Josefsen R; Kumar T; Nakstad PH
Neuroradiology; 2011 May; 53(5):319-30. PubMed ID: 20625709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Accuracy of apparent diffusion coefficients and enhancement ratios on magnetic resonance imaging in differentiating primary cerebral lymphomas from glioblastoma.
Anwar SSM; Baig MZ; Laghari AA; Mubarak F; Shamim MS; Jilani UA; Khalid MU
Neuroradiol J; 2019 Oct; 32(5):328-334. PubMed ID: 31188064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Differentiation between Glioblastoma Multiforme and Primary Cerebral Lymphoma: Additional Benefits of Quantitative Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging.
Ko CC; Tai MH; Li CF; Chen TY; Chen JH; Shu G; Kuo YT; Lee YC
PLoS One; 2016; 11(9):e0162565. PubMed ID: 27631626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging to differentiate high-grade gliomas and brain metastases.
Mouthuy N; Cosnard G; Abarca-Quinones J; Michoux N
J Neuroradiol; 2012 Dec; 39(5):301-7. PubMed ID: 22197404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Diagnostic performance of regional DTI-derived tensor metrics in glioblastoma multiforme: simultaneous evaluation of p, q, L, Cl, Cp, Cs, RA, RD, AD, mean diffusivity and fractional anisotropy.
Cortez-Conradis D; Favila R; Isaac-Olive K; Martinez-Lopez M; Rios C; Roldan-Valadez E
Eur Radiol; 2013 Apr; 23(4):1112-21. PubMed ID: 23085868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Lymphomas and glioblastomas: differences in the apparent diffusion coefficient evaluated with high b-value diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging at 3T.
Doskaliyev A; Yamasaki F; Ohtaki M; Kajiwara Y; Takeshima Y; Watanabe Y; Takayasu T; Amatya VJ; Akiyama Y; Sugiyama K; Kurisu K
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Feb; 81(2):339-44. PubMed ID: 21129872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. MR perfusion in and around the contrast-enhancement of primary CNS lymphomas.
Blasel S; Jurcoane A; Bähr O; Weise L; Harter PN; Hattingen E
J Neurooncol; 2013 Aug; 114(1):127-34. PubMed ID: 23695516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Can the apparent diffusion coefficient be used as a noninvasive parameter to distinguish tumor tissue from peritumoral tissue in cerebral gliomas?
Pauleit D; Langen KJ; Floeth F; Hautzel H; Riemenschneider MJ; Reifenberger G; Shah NJ; Müller HW
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Nov; 20(5):758-64. PubMed ID: 15503327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Elevated peritumoural rCBV values as a mean to differentiate metastases from high-grade gliomas.
Blasel S; Jurcoane A; Franz K; Morawe G; Pellikan S; Hattingen E
Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2010 Nov; 152(11):1893-9. PubMed ID: 20799046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A Magnetic Resonance comparative study between enhancement, rCBV and ACD in brain glioblastomas.
Aprile I; Muti M; Principi M; Bartolini N; Zenoni A; Tazza G; Italiani M; Ottaviano P
Radiol Med; 2002; 104(1-2):87-91. PubMed ID: 12386559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Differentiation of glioblastoma multiforme and single brain metastasis by peak height and percentage of signal intensity recovery derived from dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced perfusion MR imaging.
Cha S; Lupo JM; Chen MH; Lamborn KR; McDermott MW; Berger MS; Nelson SJ; Dillon WP
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2007; 28(6):1078-84. PubMed ID: 17569962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
