These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
388 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21330721)
1. Comparison of two treatments for the removal of selected organic micropollutants and bulk organic matter: conventional activated sludge followed by ultrafiltration versus membrane bioreactor. Sahar E; Ernst M; Godehardt M; Hein A; Herr J; Kazner C; Melin T; Cikurel H; Aharoni A; Messalem R; Brenner A; Jekel M Water Sci Technol; 2011; 63(4):733-40. PubMed ID: 21330721 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Fate of antibiotics in activated sludge followed by ultrafiltration (CAS-UF) and in a membrane bioreactor (MBR). Sahar E; Messalem R; Cikurel H; Aharoni A; Brenner A; Godehardt M; Jekel M; Ernst M Water Res; 2011 Oct; 45(16):4827-36. PubMed ID: 21764099 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effluent quality of a conventional activated sludge and a membrane bioreactor system treating hospital wastewater. Pauwels B; Fru Ngwa F; Deconinck S; Verstraete W Environ Technol; 2006 Apr; 27(4):395-402. PubMed ID: 16583824 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fate and distribution of pharmaceuticals in wastewater and sewage sludge of the conventional activated sludge (CAS) and advanced membrane bioreactor (MBR) treatment. Radjenović J; Petrović M; Barceló D Water Res; 2009 Feb; 43(3):831-41. PubMed ID: 19091371 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Removal of trace organic contaminants by an MBR comprising a mixed culture of bacteria and white-rot fungi. Nguyen LN; Hai FI; Yang S; Kang J; Leusch FD; Roddick F; Price WE; Nghiem LD Bioresour Technol; 2013 Nov; 148():234-41. PubMed ID: 24050925 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Removal of a broad range of surfactants from municipal wastewater--comparison between membrane bioreactor and conventional activated sludge treatment. González S; Petrovic M; Barceló D Chemosphere; 2007 Feb; 67(2):335-43. PubMed ID: 17123581 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cost effective and advanced phosphorus removal in membrane bioreactors for a decentralised wastewater technology. Gnirss R; Lesjean B; Adam C; Buisson H Water Sci Technol; 2003; 47(12):133-9. PubMed ID: 12926680 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Membrane bioreactors for water reclamation. Tao G; Kekre K; Wei Z; Lee TC; Viswanath B; Seah H Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):431-40. PubMed ID: 16004005 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Membrane bioreactors for final treatment of wastewater. Galil NI; Sheindorf Ch; Stahl N; Tenenbaum A; Levinsky Y Water Sci Technol; 2003; 48(8):103-10. PubMed ID: 14682576 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Membrane bioreactor (MBR) sludge inoculation in a hybrid process scheme concept to assist overloaded conventional activated sludge (CAS) process operations. Fenu A; Roels J; Van Damme S; Wambecq T; Weemaes M; Thoeye C; De Gueldre G; Van De Steene B Water Sci Technol; 2012; 66(2):457-63. PubMed ID: 22699354 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Filterability of membrane bioreactor (MBR) sludge: impacts of polyelectrolytes and mixing with conventional activated sludge. Yigit NO; Civelekoglu G; Cinar O; Kitis M Water Sci Technol; 2010; 61(3):659-69. PubMed ID: 20150702 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of linear alkylbenzene sulfonates removal in conventional activated sludge systems and membrane bioreactors. De Wever H; Van Roy S; Dotremont C; Miller J; Knepper T Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(5):219-25. PubMed ID: 15497851 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of biological activated carbon (BAC) and membrane bioreactor (MBR) for pollutants removal in drinking water treatment. Tian JY; Chen ZL; Liang H; Li X; Wang ZZ; Li GB Water Sci Technol; 2009; 60(6):1515-23. PubMed ID: 19759454 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of the removal of phthalates and other organic pollutants from industrial wastewaters in membrane bioreactor and conventional activated sludge treatment plants. Llop A; Borrull F; Pocurull E Water Sci Technol; 2009; 60(9):2425-37. PubMed ID: 19901476 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Outcomes of a 2-year investigation on enhanced biological nutrients removal and trace organics elimination in membrane bioreactor (MBR). Lesjean B; Gnirss R; Buisson H; Keller S; Tazi-Pain A; Luck F Water Sci Technol; 2005; 52(10-11):453-60. PubMed ID: 16459821 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor--a review. Bal AS; Dhagat NN Indian J Environ Health; 2001 Apr; 43(2):1-82. PubMed ID: 12397675 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Characterization of sludge structure and activity in submerged membrane bioreactor. Spérandio M; Masse A; Espinosa-Bouchot MC; Cabassud C Water Sci Technol; 2005; 52(10-11):401-8. PubMed ID: 16459815 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Removal and fate of emerging contaminants combining biological, flocculation and membrane treatments. Melo-Guimarães A; Torner-Morales FJ; Durán-Álvarez JC; Jiménez-Cisneros BE Water Sci Technol; 2013; 67(4):877-85. PubMed ID: 23306268 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Correlation between membrane fouling and soluble/colloidal organic substances in membrane bioreactors for municipal wastewater treatment. Lesjean B; Rosenberger S; Laabs C; Jekel M; Gnirss R; Amy G Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):1-8. PubMed ID: 16003955 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]