631 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21330989)
21. Comparison of inhomogeneity correction algorithms in small photon fields.
Jones AO; Das IJ
Med Phys; 2005 Mar; 32(3):766-76. PubMed ID: 15839349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparative evaluation of modern dosimetry techniques near low- and high-density heterogeneities.
Alhakeem EA; AlShaikh S; Rosenfeld AB; Zavgorodni SF
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 16(5):142–158. PubMed ID: 26699322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Underdosage of the upper-airway mucosa for small fields as used in intensity-modulated radiation therapy: a comparison between radiochromic film measurements, Monte Carlo simulations, and collapsed cone convolution calculations.
Martens C; Reynaert N; De Wagter C; Nilsson P; Coghe M; Palmans H; Thierens H; De Neve W
Med Phys; 2002 Jul; 29(7):1528-35. PubMed ID: 12148735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Ionization chamber dosimetry of small photon fields: a Monte Carlo study on stopping-power ratios for radiosurgery and IMRT beams.
Sánchez-Doblado F; Andreo P; Capote R; Leal A; Perucha M; Arráns R; Núñez L; Mainegra E; Lagares JI; Carrasco E
Phys Med Biol; 2003 Jul; 48(14):2081-99. PubMed ID: 12894972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [Comparison of RTPS and Monte Carlo dose distributions in heterogeneous phantoms for photon beams].
Nakaguchi Y; Araki F; Maruyama M; Fukuda S
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2010 Apr; 66(4):322-33. PubMed ID: 20625219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Clinical implementation and evaluation of the Acuros dose calculation algorithm.
Yan C; Combine AG; Bednarz G; Lalonde RJ; Hu B; Dickens K; Wynn R; Pavord DC; Saiful Huq M
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Sep; 18(5):195-209. PubMed ID: 28834214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Bone and mucosal dosimetry in skin radiation therapy: a Monte Carlo study using kilovoltage photon and megavoltage electron beams.
Chow JC; Jiang R
Phys Med Biol; 2012 Jun; 57(12):3885-99. PubMed ID: 22642985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Performance evaluation of Monaco radiotherapy treatment planning system using CIRS Thorax Phantom: Dosimetric assessment of flattened and non-flattened photon beams.
Saini A; Verma T; Pandey VP; Singh A; Kumar P
J Cancer Res Ther; 2023; 19(3):793-800. PubMed ID: 37470613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Investigation of AAA dose calculation algorithm accuracy in surface and buildup region for 6MV photon beam using markus parallel-plate ion chamber.
Kesen ND; Akbas U; Koksal C; Bilge H
J Xray Sci Technol; 2019; 27(2):361-369. PubMed ID: 30856153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison of dose calculation algorithms in phantoms with lung equivalent heterogeneities under conditions of lateral electronic disequilibrium.
Carrasco P; Jornet N; Duch MA; Weber L; Ginjaume M; Eudaldo T; Jurado D; Ruiz A; Ribas M
Med Phys; 2004 Oct; 31(10):2899-911. PubMed ID: 15543799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Monte carlo evaluation of the AAA treatment planning algorithm in a heterogeneous multilayer phantom and IMRT clinical treatments for an Elekta SL25 linear accelerator.
Sterpin E; Tomsej M; De Smedt B; Reynaert N; Vynckier S
Med Phys; 2007 May; 34(5):1665-77. PubMed ID: 17555248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Experimental evaluation of a GPU-based Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithm in the Monaco treatment planning system.
Paudel MR; Kim A; Sarfehnia A; Ahmad SB; Beachey DJ; Sahgal A; Keller BM
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Nov; 17(6):230-241. PubMed ID: 27929496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Dosimetric validation of the anisotropic analytical algorithm for photon dose calculation: fundamental characterization in water.
Fogliata A; Nicolini G; Vanetti E; Clivio A; Cozzi L
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Mar; 51(6):1421-38. PubMed ID: 16510953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A simple technique to improve calculated skin dose accuracy in a commercial treatment planning system.
Wang L; Cmelak AJ; Ding GX
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Mar; 19(2):191-197. PubMed ID: 29411506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Monte Carlo- versus pencil-beam-/collapsed-cone-dose calculation in a heterogeneous multi-layer phantom.
Krieger T; Sauer OA
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(5):859-68. PubMed ID: 15798260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Experimental validation of the Eclipse AAA algorithm.
Breitman K; Rathee S; Newcomb C; Murray B; Robinson D; Field C; Warkentin H; Connors S; Mackenzie M; Dunscombe P; Fallone G
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2007 May; 8(2):76-92. PubMed ID: 17592457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Benchmarking of Monte Carlo model of Siemens Oncor® linear accelerator for 18MV photon beam: Determination of initial electron beam parameters.
Najafzadeh M; Hoseini-Ghafarokhi M; Bolagh RSM; Haghparast M; Zarifi S; Nickfarjam A; Farhood B; Chow JCL
J Xray Sci Technol; 2019; 27(6):1047-1070. PubMed ID: 31498147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Build-up and surface dose measurements on phantoms using micro-MOSFET in 6 and 10 MV x-ray beams and comparisons with Monte Carlo calculations.
Xiang HF; Song JS; Chin DW; Cormack RA; Tishler RB; Makrigiorgos GM; Court LE; Chin LM
Med Phys; 2007 Apr; 34(4):1266-73. PubMed ID: 17500458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Performance of two commercial electron beam algorithms over regions close to the lung-mediastinum interface, against Monte Carlo simulation and point dosimetry in virtual and anthropomorphic phantoms.
Ojala J; Hyödynmaa S; Barańczyk R; Góra E; Waligórski MP
Phys Med; 2014 Mar; 30(2):147-54. PubMed ID: 23702438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The effect of different lung densities on the accuracy of various radiotherapy dose calculation methods: implications for tumour coverage.
Aarup LR; Nahum AE; Zacharatou C; Juhler-Nøttrup T; Knöös T; Nyström H; Specht L; Wieslander E; Korreman SS
Radiother Oncol; 2009 Jun; 91(3):405-14. PubMed ID: 19297051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
