These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21331881)

  • 1. Recognition vs recall of visually vs acoustically confusable letter matrices.
    Vingilis E; Blake J; Theodor L
    Mem Cognit; 1977 Jan; 5(1):146-50. PubMed ID: 21331881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Visual and auditory coding confusability in students with and without learning disabilities.
    Hardy BW; McIntyre CW; Brown AS; North AJ
    J Learn Disabil; 1989 Dec; 22(10):646-51. PubMed ID: 2592870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Repetition and acoustic contrast in short-term memory for letter sequences.
    Lee CL
    J Exp Psychol Hum Learn; 1976 Nov; 2(6):695-704. PubMed ID: 1010992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of subvocal suppression, articulating aloud and noise on sequence recall.
    Wilding J; Mohindra N
    Br J Psychol; 1980 May; 71(2):247-61. PubMed ID: 7378659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Children's memory for phonemically confusable and nonconfusable letters: changes with age and reading ability.
    Bisanz GL; Das JP; Mancini G
    Child Dev; 1984 Oct; 55(5):1845-54. PubMed ID: 6510056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Automatic letter priming in an alphabetic decision task.
    Jacobs AM; Grainger J
    Percept Psychophys; 1991 Jan; 49(1):43-52. PubMed ID: 2011452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Positional differences in performance on members of confusable and nonconfusable letter pairs.
    Chastain G
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1985 Dec; 11(6):752-64. PubMed ID: 2934506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Visual similarity effects in immediate serial recall and (sometimes) in immediate serial recognition.
    Chubala CM; Guitard D; Neath I; Saint-Aubin J; Surprenant AM
    Mem Cognit; 2020 Apr; 48(3):411-425. PubMed ID: 31701325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Episodic Short-Term Recognition Requires Encoding into Visual Working Memory: Evidence from Probe Recognition after Letter Report.
    Poth CH; Schneider WX
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():1440. PubMed ID: 27713722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Recall in acoustically similar and dissimilar letters by normal and deaf subjects.
    Sípos I; Arochová O
    Act Nerv Super (Praha); 1975 Sep; 17(3):169-75. PubMed ID: 1199683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Repetition effect in visual recognition of letters.
    Kuwana T
    Jpn Psychol Res; 2004 May; 46(2):98-108. PubMed ID: 15151569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. On the left and right hemisphere visual processing that precedes recognition.
    Avant LL; Thieman AA; Miller GW
    Neuropsychologia; 1993 Jul; 31(7):661-73. PubMed ID: 8371840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Matching performance and the similarity structure of the stimulus set.
    Crist WB
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1981 Sep; 110(3):269-96. PubMed ID: 6457077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Some differences between the visual and auditory memories in the short-term memory].
    Hamada J
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 1990 Apr; 61(1):8-14. PubMed ID: 2250420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The storage of physical and name properties in short-term visual memory.
    Reeve RA; Hall R
    Mem Cognit; 1976 Jan; 4(1):6-10. PubMed ID: 21286952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Is nevtral NEUTRAL? Visual similarity effects in the early phases of written-word recognition.
    Marcet A; Perea M
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Aug; 24(4):1180-1185. PubMed ID: 27873186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Visual similarity effects in immediate verbal serial recall.
    Logie RH; Della Sala S; Wynn V; Baddeley AD
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2000 Aug; 53(3):626-46. PubMed ID: 10994221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Application of geometric models to letter recognition: distance and density.
    Appelman IB; Mayzner MS
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1982 Mar; 111(1):60-100. PubMed ID: 6460835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Parallel scanning of auditory and visual information.
    Burrows D; Solomon BA
    Mem Cognit; 1975 Jul; 3(4):416-20. PubMed ID: 21287097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Multiple levels of stimulus representation in visual working memory.
    Shin E; Fabiani M; Gratton G
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 May; 18(5):844-58. PubMed ID: 16768382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.