These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21331881)

  • 21. Brain potentials in a memory-scanning task. II. Effects of aging on potentials to the probes.
    Pratt H; Michalewski HJ; Patterson JV; Starr A
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1989 Jun; 72(6):507-17. PubMed ID: 2471620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The familiarity effect for single-letter pairs.
    Ambler BA; Proctor JD
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1976 May; 2(2):222-34. PubMed ID: 830185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Presentation modality, rehearsal-prevention conditions, and auditory confusions in tests of short-term memory.
    Thompson JT; Clayton KN
    Mem Cognit; 1974 May; 2(3):426-30. PubMed ID: 21274768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Development of the Word Auditory Recognition and Recall Measure: A Working Memory Test for Use in Rehabilitative Audiology.
    Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Alexander G
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(6):e360-e376. PubMed ID: 27438869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Can I order a burger at rnacdonalds.com? Visual similarity effects of multi-letter combinations at the early stages of word recognition.
    Marcet A; Perea M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 May; 44(5):699-706. PubMed ID: 29094993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The role of item distinctiveness in short-term recall of order information.
    Cunningham TF; Marmie WR; Healy AF
    Mem Cognit; 1998 May; 26(3):463-76. PubMed ID: 9610118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Asymmetrical processing of tachistoscopic inputs in undergraduates across sex, handedness, field-side, and fixation instructions.
    Iaccino JF
    Percept Mot Skills; 1990 Jun; 70(3 Pt 2):1203-13. PubMed ID: 2399095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. How the deployment of visual attention modulates auditory distraction.
    Marsh JE; Campbell TA; Vachon F; Taylor PJ; Hughes RW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jan; 82(1):350-362. PubMed ID: 31290133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Recall and recognition processes in motor memory: effects of feedback and knowledge of results delay.
    Koch CG; Dorfman PW
    J Mot Behav; 1979 Jan; 11(1):23-34. PubMed ID: 15186969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Temporal limits of selection and memory encoding: A comparison of whole versus partial report in rapid serial visual presentation.
    Nieuwenstein MR; Potter MC
    Psychol Sci; 2006 Jun; 17(6):471-5. PubMed ID: 16771795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effects of Visual and Auditory Presentation Styles and Musical Elements on Working Memory as Measured by Monosyllabic Sequential Digit Recall.
    Silverman MJ; Schwartzberg ET
    Psychol Rep; 2019 Aug; 122(4):1297-1312. PubMed ID: 29890898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Providing a sensory basis for models of visual information acquisition.
    Loftus GR; Busey TA; Senders JW
    Percept Psychophys; 1993 Oct; 54(4):535-54. PubMed ID: 8255716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Organization of sequential typing movements.
    Soechting JF; Flanders M
    J Neurophysiol; 1992 May; 67(5):1275-90. PubMed ID: 1597712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Short-term serial tactual recall: effects of grouping on tactually probed recall of Braille letters and nonsense shapes by blind children.
    Millar S
    Br J Psychol; 1978 Feb; 69(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 626802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Stimulus-based lexical distinctiveness as a general word-recognition mechanism.
    Mattys SL; Bernstein LE; Auer ET
    Percept Psychophys; 2002 May; 64(4):667-79. PubMed ID: 12132766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Short-term retention of superimposed and of spatially distinct multiletter visual arrays.
    Parkinson SR; Kroll NE; Parks TE
    Mem Cognit; 1973 Sep; 1(3):301-3. PubMed ID: 24214562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Orthographic regularity, lexical status, and letter-identification acuity.
    Hershenson M
    Percept Mot Skills; 1982 Oct; 55(2):635-47. PubMed ID: 7155759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The effects of foveal load and visual context on peripheral letter recognition.
    Salvemini AV; Stewart AL; Purcell DG
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1996 Aug; 92(3):309-21. PubMed ID: 8782427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Recognition time for letters and nonletters: effects of serial position, array size, and processing order.
    Mason M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1982 Oct; 8(5):724-38. PubMed ID: 6218232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Interaction between lateralization of memory and probe stimulus in the recognition of verbal and spatial visual stimuli.
    Berrini R; Capitani E; Della Sala S; Spinnler H
    Neuropsychologia; 1984; 22(4):517-20. PubMed ID: 6483179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.