231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21331930)
1. FDG PET and PET/CT for colorectal cancer.
Delbeke D; Martin WH
Methods Mol Biol; 2011; 727():77-103. PubMed ID: 21331930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. PET and PET-CT for evaluation of colorectal carcinoma.
Delbeke D; Martin WH
Semin Nucl Med; 2004 Jul; 34(3):209-23. PubMed ID: 15202102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Positron emission tomography for evaluation of colorectal carcinoma.
Vitola J; Delbeke D
Semin Roentgenol; 2002 Apr; 37(2):118-28. PubMed ID: 12134365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of Fluorodeoxyglucose PET/Computed Tomography on the Management of Patients with Colorectal Cancer.
Laurens ST; Oyen WJ
PET Clin; 2015 Jul; 10(3):345-60. PubMed ID: 26099671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Evaluation of positron emission tomography by using F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose in diagnosis of recurrent colorectal cancer].
Kula Z; Szefer J; Zuchora Z; Romanowicz G; Pietrzak T
Pol Merkur Lekarski; 2004; 17 Suppl 1():63-6. PubMed ID: 15603351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Can (18)F-FDG PET/CT scan change treatment planning and be prognostic in recurrent colorectal carcinoma? A prospective and follow-up study.
Artiko V; Odalovic S; Sobic-Saranovic D; Petrovic M; Stojiljkovic M; Petrovic N; Kozarevic N; Grozdic-Milojevic I; Obradovic V
Hell J Nucl Med; 2015; 18(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 25840571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical impact of fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography scan/computed tomography in comparison with computed tomography on the detection of colorectal cancer recurrence.
Deleau C; Buecher B; Rousseau C; Kraeber-Bodéré F; Flamant M; des Varannes SB; Frampas E; Galmiche JP; Matysiak-Budnik T
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2011 Mar; 23(3):275-81. PubMed ID: 21304319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical use of combined positron emission tomography and computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) in recurrent ovarian cancer.
Thrall MM; DeLoia JA; Gallion H; Avril N
Gynecol Oncol; 2007 Apr; 105(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 17208284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The impact of FDG-PET on the management algorithm for recurrent colorectal cancer.
Arulampalam T; Costa D; Visvikis D; Boulos P; Taylor I; Ell P
Eur J Nucl Med; 2001 Dec; 28(12):1758-65. PubMed ID: 11734912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Differentiation between peri-anastomotic inflammatory changes and local recurrence following neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy surgery for colorectal cancer using visual and semiquantitative analysis of PET-CT data.
Smeets P; Ham H; Ceelen W; Boterberg T; Verstraete K; Goethals I
Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2010 Jun; 54(3):327-32. PubMed ID: 20639817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. PET/CT pattern analysis for surgical staple line recurrence in patients with colorectal cancer.
Shyn PB; Madan R; Wu C; Erturk SM; Silverman SG
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Feb; 194(2):414-21. PubMed ID: 20093604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Positron emission tomography in colorectal cancer.
Flamen P
Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol; 2002 Apr; 16(2):237-51. PubMed ID: 11969236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessment of tumor recurrence in patients with colorectal cancer and elevated carcinoembryonic antigen level: FDG PET/CT versus contrast-enhanced 64-MDCT of the chest and abdomen.
Metser U; You J; McSweeney S; Freeman M; Hendler A
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Mar; 194(3):766-71. PubMed ID: 20173157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in the evaluation of oesophageal carcinoma.
Chowdhury FU; Bradley KM; Gleeson FV
Clin Radiol; 2008 Dec; 63(12):1297-309. PubMed ID: 18996259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the management of patients with epithelial ovarian carcinoma after treatment.
Nasu K; Abe W; Takai N; Tomonari K; Narahara H
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2011 May; 283(5):1121-6. PubMed ID: 20574659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Importance of FDG-PET/computed tomography in colorectal cancer].
Kleiner S; Weber W
Radiologe; 2019 Sep; 59(9):812-819. PubMed ID: 31428810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The role of 18F-fluoro-deoxy-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) in the management of patients with colorectal cancer.
Pelosi E; Deandreis D
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2007 Feb; 33(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 17126522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical value of F18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography in patients with non-small cell lung cancer after potentially curative surgery: experience with 241 patients.
Kanzaki R; Higashiyama M; Maeda J; Okami J; Hosoki T; Hasegawa Y; Takami M; Kodama K
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2010 Jun; 10(6):1009-14. PubMed ID: 20197344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison between 18F-FDG PET, in-line PET/CT, and software fusion for restaging of recurrent colorectal cancer.
Kim JH; Czernin J; Allen-Auerbach MS; Halpern BS; Fueger BJ; Hecht JR; Ratib O; Phelps ME; Weber WA
J Nucl Med; 2005 Apr; 46(4):587-95. PubMed ID: 15809480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. PET and PET/CT using 18F-FDG in the diagnosis and management of cancer patients.
Endo K; Oriuchi N; Higuchi T; Iida Y; Hanaoka H; Miyakubo M; Ishikita T; Koyama K
Int J Clin Oncol; 2006 Aug; 11(4):286-96. PubMed ID: 16937302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
