These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

293 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2133198)

  • 21. Effectiveness of ART and traditional amalgam approach in restoring single-surface cavities in posterior teeth of permanent dentitions in school children after 6.3 years.
    Frencken JE; van't Hof MA; Taifour D; Al-Zaher I
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2007 Jun; 35(3):207-14. PubMed ID: 17518967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Preservation-based approaches to restore posterior teeth with amalgam, resin or a combination of materials.
    Baghdadi ZD
    Am J Dent; 2002 Feb; 15(1):54-65. PubMed ID: 12074231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Re-intervention in glass ionomer restorations: what comes next?
    Burke FJ; Lucarotti PS
    J Dent; 2009 Jan; 37(1):39-43. PubMed ID: 18819740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Artificially formed caries-like lesions around Class II glass ionomer restorations in primary molars.
    Sepet E; Aytepe Z; Guven Y
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1995; 20(1):37-40. PubMed ID: 8634193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Re-establishing occlusal anatomy: a new technique for direct tooth coloured restorations.
    Liebenberg WH
    J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1995 Oct; 50(10):475-81. PubMed ID: 8613576
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Clinical aspects of restorative treatment in the primary dentition.
    Varpio M
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1993; 96():1-47. PubMed ID: 8310420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The clinical evaluation of glass ionomer cements and microfilled composite resins in the treatment of cervical lesions of the teeth (confirmed with scanning electron microscopy).
    Shahani DR; Kolwalkar NS
    J Indian Dent Assoc; 1986 Jan; 58(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 3457864
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The future of dental amalgam: a review of the literature. Part 7: Possible alternative materials to amalgam for the restoration of posterior teeth.
    Eley BM
    Br Dent J; 1997 Jul; 183(1):11-4. PubMed ID: 9254957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Occlusal glass ionomer cermet, resin sandwich and amalgam restorations: a 2-year clinical study.
    Lidums A; Wilkie R; Smales R
    Am J Dent; 1993 Aug; 6(4):185-8. PubMed ID: 7803005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A conservative approach to patient care.
    Berland L
    Dent Today; 2010 Nov; 29(11):152, 154-5. PubMed ID: 21133032
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Alternatives to amalgam.
    Lyons K
    N Z Dent J; 1997 Jun; 93(412):47-50. PubMed ID: 9293745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. In vitro comparison of cuspal fracture resistances of posterior teeth restored with various adhesive restorations.
    Cötert HS; Sen BH; Balkan M
    Int J Prosthodont; 2001; 14(4):374-8. PubMed ID: 11508095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Secondary caries formation in vitro around fluoride-releasing restorations.
    Dionysopoulos P; Kotsanos N; Koliniotou-Koubia ; Papagodiannis Y
    Oper Dent; 1994; 19(5):183-8. PubMed ID: 8700758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Direct placement restorative materials for use in posterior teeth: the current options.
    Lyons K;
    N Z Dent J; 2003 Mar; 99(1):10-5. PubMed ID: 15330384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Discrimination between restorative dental materials by their radiopacity measured in film radiographs and digital images.
    Wenzel A; Hintze H; Hørsted-Bindslev P
    J Forensic Odontostomatol; 1998 Jun; 16(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 9922755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Long-term clinical evaluation of fracture and pulp injury following glass-ionomer cement or composite resin applied as a base filling in teeth restored with amalgam.
    De C Luz MA; Ciaramicoli-Rodrigues MT; Garone Netto N; De Lima AC
    J Oral Rehabil; 2001 Jul; 28(7):634-9. PubMed ID: 11422695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Tooth-colored filling materials for the restoration of cervical lesions: a 24-month follow-up study.
    Folwaczny M; Loher C; Mehl A; Kunzelmann KH; Hinkel R
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):251-8. PubMed ID: 11203827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Materials for conservative posterior restorations.
    Donovan TE; Cho GC
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 1996 Sep; 24(9):32-8. PubMed ID: 9120610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Resistance to cusp fracture in endodontically treated teeth.
    Wendt SL; Harris BM; Hunt TE
    Dent Mater; 1987 Oct; 3(5):232-5. PubMed ID: 3479358
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Posterior restorative materials--decisions.
    Giblin JP
    Aust Prosthodont J; 1988; 2():81-5. PubMed ID: 3272830
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.