These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

706 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21332037)

  • 1. [Hemodynamic monitoring in the intensive care unit: pulmonary artery catheter versus PiCCO].
    Gassanov N; Caglayan E; Nia A; Erdmann E; Er F
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2011 Feb; 136(8):376-80. PubMed ID: 21332037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Noninvasive cardiac output determination using applanation tonometry-derived radial artery pulse contour analysis in critically ill patients.
    Compton F; Wittrock M; Schaefer JH; Zidek W; Tepel M; Scholze A
    Anesth Analg; 2008 Jan; 106(1):171-4, table of contents. PubMed ID: 18165574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pulmonary artery thermodilution cardiac output vs. transpulmonary thermodilution cardiac output in two patients with intrathoracic pathology.
    Breukers RB; Jansen JR
    Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2004 May; 48(5):658-61. PubMed ID: 15101866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Techniques for determining cardiac output in the intensive care unit.
    Mohammed I; Phillips C
    Crit Care Clin; 2010 Apr; 26(2):355-64, table of contents. PubMed ID: 20381725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Less invasive hemodynamic monitoring in critically ill patients.
    Teboul JL; Saugel B; Cecconi M; De Backer D; Hofer CK; Monnet X; Perel A; Pinsky MR; Reuter DA; Rhodes A; Squara P; Vincent JL; Scheeren TW
    Intensive Care Med; 2016 Sep; 42(9):1350-9. PubMed ID: 27155605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Circulation monitoring of critically ill patients with the Pulse Contour Cardiac Output system].
    Afshari A; Perner A; Bonde J
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2006 May; 168(18):1746-9. PubMed ID: 16729924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of continuous renal replacement therapy on cardiac output measurement using thermodilution techniques.
    Heise D; Faulstich M; Mörer O; Bräuer A; Quintel M
    Minerva Anestesiol; 2012 Mar; 78(3):315-21. PubMed ID: 22240621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Study of continuous hemodynamics monitoring techniques in patients with mechanical ventilation].
    Zhang NX; Qin YZ; Xu L; Zhan C; Wang SP
    Zhongguo Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue; 2006 Jun; 18(6):359-62. PubMed ID: 16784565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Continuous invasive cardiac output monitoring--the Baxter/Edwards Critical-Care Swan Ganz IntelliCath and Viligance system.
    Munro HM; Wood CE; Taylor BL; Smith GB
    Clin Intensive Care; 1994; 5(2):52-5. PubMed ID: 10147254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Nurse-determined assessment of cardiac output. Comparing a non-invasive cardiac output device and pulmonary artery catheter: a prospective observational study.
    Corley A; Barnett AG; Mullany D; Fraser JF
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2009 Oct; 46(10):1291-7. PubMed ID: 19423107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Volumetric monitoring based on transpulmonary thermodilution in anesthesiology and intensive care].
    Kuz'kov VV; Kirov MIu; Nedashkovskiĭ EV
    Anesteziol Reanimatol; 2003; (4):67-73. PubMed ID: 14524028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical validation of the non-invasive cardiac output monitor USCOM-1A in critically ill patients.
    van Lelyveld-Haas LE; van Zanten AR; Borm GF; Tjan DH
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2008 Nov; 25(11):917-24. PubMed ID: 18652712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of a new semi-continuous cardiac output system in the intensive care unit.
    Seguin P; Colcanap O; Le Rouzo A; Tanguy M; Guillou YM; Mallédant Y
    Can J Anaesth; 1998 Jun; 45(6):578-83. PubMed ID: 9669016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Volume-limited versus pressure-limited hemodynamic management in septic and nonseptic shock.
    Trof RJ; Beishuizen A; Cornet AD; de Wit RJ; Girbes AR; Groeneveld AB
    Crit Care Med; 2012 Apr; 40(4):1177-85. PubMed ID: 22202713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pulmonary artery catheter versus pulse contour analysis: a prospective epidemiological study.
    Uchino S; Bellomo R; Morimatsu H; Sugihara M; French C; Stephens D; Wendon J; Honore P; Mulder J; Turner A;
    Crit Care; 2006; 10(6):R174. PubMed ID: 17169160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cardiac output monitoring using indicator-dilution techniques: basics, limits, and perspectives.
    Reuter DA; Huang C; Edrich T; Shernan SK; Eltzschig HK
    Anesth Analg; 2010 Mar; 110(3):799-811. PubMed ID: 20185659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Determination of the precision error of the pulmonary artery thermodilution catheter using an in vitro continuous flow test rig.
    Yang XX; Critchley LA; Joynt GM
    Anesth Analg; 2011 Jan; 112(1):70-7. PubMed ID: 21127281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Measurement of cardiac output by transpulmonary arterial thermodilution using a long radial artery catheter. A comparison with intermittent pulmonary artery thermodilution.
    Orme RM; Pigott DW; Mihm FG
    Anaesthesia; 2004 Jun; 59(6):590-4. PubMed ID: 15144300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Cardiac index monitoring by pulse contour analysis: 2. PiCCO].
    Nakamura T
    Masui; 2009 Jul; 58(7):848-53. PubMed ID: 19618825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Various methods for monitoring cardiac output in intensive care patients].
    Palsgaard Møller T; Perner A; Bülow HH
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2012 Sep; 174(36):2067-71. PubMed ID: 22944325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 36.