676 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21332302)
1. Readability of online health information: implications for health literacy.
McInnes N; Haglund BJ
Inform Health Soc Care; 2011 Dec; 36(4):173-89. PubMed ID: 21332302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Health literacy and the World Wide Web: comparing the readability of leading incident cancers on the Internet.
Friedman DB; Hoffman-Goetz L; Arocha JF
Med Inform Internet Med; 2006 Mar; 31(1):67-87. PubMed ID: 16754369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Readability assessment of internet-based consumer health information.
Walsh TM; Volsko TA
Respir Care; 2008 Oct; 53(10):1310-5. PubMed ID: 18811992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Information about oral cancer on the Internet: our patients cannot understand it.
Varela-Centelles P; Ledesma-Ludi Y; Seoane-Romero JM; Seoane J
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Apr; 53(4):393-5. PubMed ID: 25703184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Readability of consumer health information on the internet: a comparison of U.S. government-funded and commercially funded websites.
Risoldi Cochrane Z; Gregory P; Wilson A
J Health Commun; 2012; 17(9):1003-10. PubMed ID: 22512714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diabetes websites accredited by the Health On the Net Foundation Code of Conduct: readable or not?
Kusec S; Brborovic O; Schillinger D
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2003; 95():655-60. PubMed ID: 14664062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Health literacy and the Internet: a study on the readability of Australian online health information.
Cheng C; Dunn M
Aust N Z J Public Health; 2015 Aug; 39(4):309-14. PubMed ID: 25716142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Breast reconstruction post mastectomy- Let's Google it. Accessibility, readability and quality of online information.
Lynch NP; Lang B; Angelov S; McGarrigle SA; Boyle TJ; Al-Azawi D; Connolly EM
Breast; 2017 Apr; 32():126-129. PubMed ID: 28178606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Readability analysis of online health information on preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP).
Kecojevic A; Basch CH; Garcia P
Public Health; 2020 May; 182():53-55. PubMed ID: 32171091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Readability of Wikipedia Pages on Autoimmune Disorders: Systematic Quantitative Assessment.
Watad A; Bragazzi NL; Brigo F; Sharif K; Amital H; McGonagle D; Shoenfeld Y; Adawi M
J Med Internet Res; 2017 Jul; 19(7):e260. PubMed ID: 28720555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Readability of websites containing information about prostate cancer treatment options.
Ellimoottil C; Polcari A; Kadlec A; Gupta G
J Urol; 2012 Dec; 188(6):2171-5. PubMed ID: 23083852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A readability assessment of online stroke information.
Sharma N; Tridimas A; Fitzsimmons PR
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis; 2014 Jul; 23(6):1362-7. PubMed ID: 24389374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Readability assessment of online tracheostomy care resources.
Kong KA; Hu A
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2015 Feb; 152(2):272-8. PubMed ID: 25450410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessment of online patient education materials from major ophthalmologic associations.
Huang G; Fang CH; Agarwal N; Bhagat N; Eloy JA; Langer PD
JAMA Ophthalmol; 2015 Apr; 133(4):449-54. PubMed ID: 25654639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Readability of online patient resources for the operative treatment of breast cancer.
Vargas CR; Chuang DJ; Ganor O; Lee BT
Surgery; 2014 Aug; 156(2):311-8. PubMed ID: 24953268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) procedure: an assessment of the quality and readability of online information.
Lim SJM; Kelly M; Selvarajah L; Murray M; Scanlon T
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2021 May; 21(1):149. PubMed ID: 33952225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quality and readability of English-language internet information for adults with hearing impairment and their significant others.
Laplante-Lévesque A; Brännström KJ; Andersson G; Lunner T
Int J Audiol; 2012 Aug; 51(8):618-26. PubMed ID: 22731921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clearly written, easily comprehended? The readability of websites providing information on epilepsy.
Brigo F; Otte WM; Igwe SC; Tezzon F; Nardone R
Epilepsy Behav; 2015 Mar; 44():35-9. PubMed ID: 25601720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Patient-orientated web sites on laryngectomy: is their information readable?
Pothier L; Pothier DD
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl); 2009 Nov; 18(6):594-7. PubMed ID: 19549174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effect of search term on the quality and accuracy of online information regarding distal radius fractures.
Dy CJ; Taylor SA; Patel RM; Kitay A; Roberts TR; Daluiski A
J Hand Surg Am; 2012 Sep; 37(9):1881-7. PubMed ID: 22857909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
