BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1387 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21332585)

  • 21. Microsatellite length variation in candidate genes correlates with habitat in the gilthead sea bream Sparus aurata.
    Chaoui L; Gagnaire PA; Guinand B; Quignard JP; Tsigenopoulos C; Kara MH; Bonhomme F
    Mol Ecol; 2012 Nov; 21(22):5497-511. PubMed ID: 23061421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Adaptive divergence in a high gene flow environment: Hsc70 variation in the European flounder (Platichthys flesus L.).
    Hemmer-Hansen J; Nielsen EE; Frydenberg J; Loeschcke V
    Heredity (Edinb); 2007 Dec; 99(6):592-600. PubMed ID: 17848973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. High degree of genetic differentiation in marine three-spined sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus).
    Defaveri J; Shikano T; Shimada Y; Merilä J
    Mol Ecol; 2013 Sep; 22(18):4811-28. PubMed ID: 23947683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. SNP signatures of selection on standing genetic variation and their association with adaptive phenotypes along gradients of ecological speciation in lake whitefish species pairs (Coregonus spp.).
    Renaut S; Nolte AW; Rogers SM; Derome N; Bernatchez L
    Mol Ecol; 2011 Feb; 20(3):545-59. PubMed ID: 21143332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Generic scan using AFLP markers as a means to assess the role of directional selection in the divergence of sympatric whitefish ecotypes.
    Campbell D; Bernatchez L
    Mol Biol Evol; 2004 May; 21(5):945-56. PubMed ID: 15014172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Population fragmentation and major histocompatibility complex variation in the spotted suslik, Spermophilus suslicus.
    Biedrzycka A; Radwan J
    Mol Ecol; 2008 Nov; 17(22):4801-11. PubMed ID: 19140973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Admixture facilitates adaptation from standing variation in the European aspen (Populus tremula L.), a widespread forest tree.
    DE Carvalho D; Ingvarsson PK; Joseph J; Suter L; Sedivy C; Macaya-Sanz D; Cottrell J; Heinze B; Schanzer I; Lexer C
    Mol Ecol; 2010 Apr; 19(8):1638-50. PubMed ID: 20345678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Microsatellite variation and population structure of the moor frog (Rana arvalis) in Scandinavia.
    Knopp T; Merilä J
    Mol Ecol; 2009 Jul; 18(14):2996-3005. PubMed ID: 19538347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Variable patterns of introgression in two sculpin hybrid zones suggest that genomic isolation differs among populations.
    Nolte AW; Gompert Z; Buerkle CA
    Mol Ecol; 2009 Jun; 18(12):2615-27. PubMed ID: 19457191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Latitudinal divergence in a widespread amphibian: Contrasting patterns of neutral and adaptive genomic variation.
    Rödin-Mörch P; Luquet E; Meyer-Lucht Y; Richter-Boix A; Höglund J; Laurila A
    Mol Ecol; 2019 Jun; 28(12):2996-3011. PubMed ID: 31134695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Using genome scans of DNA polymorphism to infer adaptive population divergence.
    Storz JF
    Mol Ecol; 2005 Mar; 14(3):671-88. PubMed ID: 15723660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Do landscape processes predict phylogeographic patterns in the wood frog?
    Lee-Yaw JA; Davidson A; McRae BH; Green DM
    Mol Ecol; 2009 May; 18(9):1863-74. PubMed ID: 19302465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Heterogeneous genomic differentiation between walking-stick ecotypes: "isolation by adaptation" and multiple roles for divergent selection.
    Nosil P; Egan SP; Funk DJ
    Evolution; 2008 Feb; 62(2):316-36. PubMed ID: 17999721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The coupling hypothesis: why genome scans may fail to map local adaptation genes.
    Bierne N; Welch J; Loire E; Bonhomme F; David P
    Mol Ecol; 2011 May; 20(10):2044-72. PubMed ID: 21476991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Genetic diversity and differentiation at MHC genes in island populations of tuatara (Sphenodon spp.).
    Miller HC; Allendorf F; Daugherty CH
    Mol Ecol; 2010 Sep; 19(18):3894-908. PubMed ID: 20723045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Adaptation of redband trout in desert and montane environments.
    Narum SR; Campbell NR; Kozfkay CC; Meyer KA
    Mol Ecol; 2010 Nov; 19(21):4622-37. PubMed ID: 20880387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Local selection and population structure in a deep-sea fish, the roundnose grenadier (Coryphaenoides rupestris).
    White TA; Stamford J; Rus Hoelzel A
    Mol Ecol; 2010 Jan; 19(2):216-26. PubMed ID: 20002604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Geographic variation in acid stress tolerance of the moor frog, Rana arvalis. I. Local adaptation.
    Räsänen K; Laurila A; Merilä J
    Evolution; 2003 Feb; 57(2):352-62. PubMed ID: 12683531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Local effects of limited recombination: historical perspective and consequences for population estimates of adaptive evolution.
    Williford A; Comeron JM
    J Hered; 2010; 101 Suppl 1():S127-34. PubMed ID: 20421321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Geographic variation in adaptation at the molecular level: a case study of plant immunity genes.
    Moeller DA; Tiffin P
    Evolution; 2008 Dec; 62(12):3069-81. PubMed ID: 18786191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 70.