363 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21332743)
1. Comparison of bioactive glass coated and hydroxyapatite coated titanium dental implants in the human jaw bone.
Mistry S; Kundu D; Datta S; Basu D
Aust Dent J; 2011 Mar; 56(1):68-75. PubMed ID: 21332743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of hydroxyapatite (HA) -coated threaded, HA-coated cylindric, and titanium threaded endosseous dental implants.
Jeffcoat MK; McGlumphy EA; Reddy MS; Geurs NC; Proskin HM
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(3):406-10. PubMed ID: 12814316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Early loading of nonsubmerged titanium implants with a chemically modified sand-blasted and acid-etched surface: 6-month results of a prospective case series study in the posterior mandible focusing on peri-implant crestal bone changes and implant stability quotient (ISQ) values.
Bornstein MM; Hart CN; Halbritter SA; Morton D; Buser D
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Dec; 11(4):338-47. PubMed ID: 19438966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Performance of dental implants after staged sinus floor elevation procedures: 5-year results of a prospective study in partially edentulous patients.
Bornstein MM; Chappuis V; von Arx T; Buser D
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Oct; 19(10):1034-43. PubMed ID: 18828820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The role of titanium implant surface modification with hydroxyapatite nanoparticles in progressive early bone-implant fixation in vivo.
Lin A; Wang CJ; Kelly J; Gubbi P; Nishimura I
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):808-16. PubMed ID: 19865620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Porous-surfaced dental implants in the partially edentulous maxilla: assessment for subclinical mobility.
Deporter D; Todescan R; Riley N
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2002 Apr; 22(2):184-92. PubMed ID: 12019714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Marginal bone loss pattern around hydroxyapatite-coated versus commercially pure titanium implants after up to 12 years of follow-up.
Schwartz-Arad D; Mardinger O; Levin L; Kozlovsky A; Hirshberg A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(2):238-44. PubMed ID: 15839117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Short (8-mm) dental implants in the rehabilitation of partial and complete edentulism: a 3- to 14-year longitudinal study.
Romeo E; Ghisolfi M; Rozza R; Chiapasco M; Lops D
Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(6):586-92. PubMed ID: 17165298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prospective study of 429 hydroxyapatite-coated cylindric omniloc implants placed in 121 patients.
McGlumphy EA; Peterson LJ; Larsen PE; Jeffcoat MK
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(1):82-92. PubMed ID: 12608673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Randomized multicenter comparison of two coatings of intramobile cylinder implants in 313 partially edentulous mandibles followed up for 5 years.
Mau J; Behneke A; Behneke N; Fritzemeier CU; Gomez-Roman G; d'Hoedt B; Spiekermann H; Strunz V; Yong M
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2002 Oct; 13(5):477-87. PubMed ID: 12453124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Histologic analysis of a fractured implant: a case report.
Brunel G; Armand S; Miller N; Rue J
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2000 Oct; 20(5):520-6. PubMed ID: 11203589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Moderately roughened- and roughened-surface implants used as rigid orthodontic anchorage: a case series.
Kato S; Kato M
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2006; 8(2):87-94. PubMed ID: 16774594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Early loading after 21 days of healing of nonsubmerged titanium implants with a chemically modified sandblasted and acid-etched surface: two-year results of a prospective two-center study.
Morton D; Bornstein MM; Wittneben JG; Martin WC; Ruskin JD; Hart CN; Buser D
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2010 Mar; 12(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 19744195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of hydroxyapatite nanocrystals on early bone formation surrounding dental implants.
Svanborg LM; Hoffman M; Andersson M; Currie F; Kjellin P; Wennerberg A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Mar; 40(3):308-15. PubMed ID: 21111575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A 24-week prospective study comparing the stability of titanium dioxide grit-blasted dental implants with and without fluoride treatment.
Geckili O; Bilhan H; Bilgin T
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):684-8. PubMed ID: 19885409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Periodontal-type measurements associated with hydroxyapatite-coated and non-HA-coated implants: uncovering to 36 months.
Morris HF; Ochi S; Spray JR; Olson JW
Ann Periodontol; 2000 Dec; 5(1):56-67. PubMed ID: 11885182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison of endosseous dental implant surfaces.
Cochran DL
J Periodontol; 1999 Dec; 70(12):1523-39. PubMed ID: 10632528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of 3 different endosseous nonsubmerged implants in edentulous mandibles: a clinical report.
Røynesdal AK; Ambjørnsen E; Haanaes HR
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1999; 14(4):543-8. PubMed ID: 10453670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biological performance of chemical hydroxyapatite coating associated with implant surface modification by laser beam: biomechanical study in rabbit tibias.
Faeda RS; Tavares HS; Sartori R; Guastaldi AC; Marcantonio E
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Aug; 67(8):1706-15. PubMed ID: 19615586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quantitative histomorphometric description of implant anchorage for three types of dental implants following 3 months of healing in baboons.
Carr AB; Gerard DA; Larsen PE
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(6):777-84. PubMed ID: 9425758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
