99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21332805)
1. Quantitative evaluation of patch test reactions: a comparison between visual grading and erythema index image analysis.
Ohshima H; Takiwaki H; Washizaki K; Ishiko A; Itoh M; Kanto H
Skin Res Technol; 2011 May; 17(2):220-5. PubMed ID: 21332805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quantification of allergic and irritant patch test reactions using ImageJ.
Ohshima H; Kinoshita S; Futagawa M; Takiwaki H; Washizaki K; Ishiko A; Kanto H
Skin Res Technol; 2014 May; 20(2):177-81. PubMed ID: 24118475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Allergy patch test reading from photographic images: disagreement on ICDRG grading but agreement on simplified tripartite reading.
Ivens U; Serup J; O'goshi K
Skin Res Technol; 2007 Feb; 13(1):110-3. PubMed ID: 17250541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Simultaneous sodium lauryl sulphate testing improves the diagnostic validity of allergic patch tests. Results from a prospective multicentre study of the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group (Deutsche Kontaktallergie-Gruppe, DKG).
Löffler H; Becker D; Brasch J; Geier J;
Br J Dermatol; 2005 Apr; 152(4):709-19. PubMed ID: 15840103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of dark circles of the lower eyelid: comparison between reflectance meters and image processing and involvement of dermal thickness in appearance.
Ohshima H; Takiwaki H
Skin Res Technol; 2008 May; 14(2):135-41. PubMed ID: 18412554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Severe allergic contact dermatitis secondary to nitroglycerin in a transdermal therapeutic system.
Topaz O; Abraham D
Ann Allergy; 1987 Nov; 59(5):365-6. PubMed ID: 3120627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Use of digital photography and image analysis techniques to quantify erythema in health care workers.
Canning J; Barford B; Sullivan D; Wickett R; Visscher M
Skin Res Technol; 2009 Feb; 15(1):24-34. PubMed ID: 19152575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Papulo-vesicular count for the rating of allergic patch test reactions. A simple technique based on polysulfide rubber replica.
Peters K; Serup J
Acta Derm Venereol; 1987; 67(6):491-5. PubMed ID: 2451373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Objective evaluation of skin prick test reactions using digital photography.
dos Santos RV; Titus RG; Lima HC
Skin Res Technol; 2007 May; 13(2):148-53. PubMed ID: 17374055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Patch test reactions to human dander in atopic dermatitis.
Uehara M; Ofuji S
Arch Dermatol; 1976 Jul; 112(7):951-4. PubMed ID: 938073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The objective evaluation of the severity of psoriatic scales with desquamation collecting tapes and image analysis.
Kim JH; Kim BY; Choi JW; Kim SO; Lee HS; Park KC; Youn SW
Skin Res Technol; 2012 May; 18(2):143-50. PubMed ID: 21507073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Contact allergy in children referred for patch testing: North American Contact Dermatitis Group data, 2001-2004.
Zug KA; McGinley-Smith D; Warshaw EM; Taylor JS; Rietschel RL; Maibach HI; Belsito DV; Fowler JF; Storrs FJ; DeLeo VA; Marks JG; Mathias CG; Pratt MD; Sasseville D
Arch Dermatol; 2008 Oct; 144(10):1329-36. PubMed ID: 18936397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. 'Passe-partout effect' in positive patch test reactions: a novel pattern of edge effect.
Ozkaya E
Contact Dermatitis; 2009 Oct; 61(4):245-7. PubMed ID: 19825103
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Allergic contact dermatitis from iodine preparations: a conundrum.
Lee SK; Zhai H; Maibach HI
Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Apr; 52(4):184-7. PubMed ID: 15859989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sensitive skin: correlation with skin surface microrelief appearance.
Sparavigna A; Pietro A; Setaro M
Skin Res Technol; 2006 Feb; 12(1):7-10. PubMed ID: 16420532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of skin susceptibility to irritancy by routine patch testing with sodium lauryl sulfate.
Löffler H; Pirker C; Aramaki J; Frosch PJ; Happle R; Effendy I
Eur J Dermatol; 2001; 11(5):416-9. PubMed ID: 11525947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ultrasound B scanning with image analysis for assessment of allergic patch test reactions.
Seidenari S; Di Nardo A; Pepe P; Giannetti A
Contact Dermatitis; 1991 Mar; 24(3):216-22. PubMed ID: 1868705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quantitative evaluation of efficacy of photodynamic therapy for port-wine stains using erythema index image analysis.
Zhao Y; Tao J; Tu P
Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther; 2013 May; 10(2):96-102. PubMed ID: 23769274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison testing of the irritancy of children's liquid bubble bath using a modified human repeat insult patch test.
West NY; Fitzpatrick JE; Jackson EM
Am J Contact Dermat; 1998 Dec; 9(4):212-5. PubMed ID: 9810021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Objective evaluation for severity of atopic dermatitis by morphologic study of skin surface contours.
Son SW; Park SY; Ha SH; Park GM; Kim MG; Moon JS; Yoo DS; Oh CH
Skin Res Technol; 2005 Nov; 11(4):272-80. PubMed ID: 16221144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
