99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21332805)
21. A study of a method for distribution analysis of skin color.
Ha S; Lee M; Lee O; Lee G; Kim J; Moon J; Kim M; Oh C
Skin Res Technol; 2009 May; 15(2):200-13. PubMed ID: 19416467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Usefulness of dermoscopy in the evaluation of patch test reactions.
Oppermann K; Cattani CAS; Bonamigo RR
An Bras Dermatol; 2021; 96(6):706-711. PubMed ID: 34629194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Assessment of erythema in irritant contact dermatitis. Comparison between visual scoring and laser Doppler flowmetry.
Willis CM; Stephens CJ; Wilkinson JD
Contact Dermatitis; 1988 Mar; 18(3):138-42. PubMed ID: 2966711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Quantitative evaluation of elderly skin based on digital image analysis.
Tanaka H; Nakagami G; Sanada H; Sari Y; Kobayashi H; Kishi K; Konya C; Tadaka E
Skin Res Technol; 2008 May; 14(2):192-200. PubMed ID: 18412562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Simulation and analysis of optical skin lesion images.
She Z; Duller AW; Liu Y; Fish PJ
Skin Res Technol; 2006 May; 12(2):133-44. PubMed ID: 16626388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Historical perspective on the use of visual grading scales in evaluating skin irritation and sensitization.
Farage MA; Maibach HI; Andersen KE; Lachapelle JM; Kern P; Ryan C; Ely J; Kanti A
Contact Dermatitis; 2011 Aug; 65(2):65-75. PubMed ID: 21668861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Guidelines for measurement of skin colour and erythema. A report from the Standardization Group of the European Society of Contact Dermatitis.
Fullerton A; Fischer T; Lahti A; Wilhelm KP; Takiwaki H; Serup J
Contact Dermatitis; 1996 Jul; 35(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 8896947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Positive patch test reaction without clinical contact dermatitis--what is the best approach in medico-legal evaluation?].
Fartasch M; Drexler H; Diepgen TL; John SM; Brandenburg S
J Dtsch Dermatol Ges; 2008 Jan; 6(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 18190432
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Improved quantitative evaluation of atopic dermatitis by camera calibration and rectification of a stereo image.
Lee O; Yu J; Lee G; Park G; Kim M; Oh C
Skin Res Technol; 2011 Feb; 17(1):11-9. PubMed ID: 20923459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The quantification of patch test responses: a comparison between echographic and colorimetric methods.
Seidenari S; Belletti B
Acta Derm Venereol; 1998 Sep; 78(5):364-6. PubMed ID: 9779256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Path test reactions to the Chinese Standard Screening Allergens in 1,135 patients investigated for allergic contact dermatitis.
Liu YQ; Zhao B; Zhuang LH; Fan WX
Am J Contact Dermat; 1997 Sep; 8(3):141-3. PubMed ID: 9249281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A quantitative assessment of the human skin surface using polarized light digital photography and its dermatologic significance.
Bae EJ; Seo SH; Kye YC; Ahn HH
Skin Res Technol; 2010 Aug; 16(3):270-4. PubMed ID: 20636994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Erythema multiforme due to contact with laurel oil.
Athanasiadis GI; Pfab F; Klein A; Braun-Falco M; Ring J; Ollert M
Contact Dermatitis; 2007 Aug; 57(2):116-8. PubMed ID: 17627652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A comparative study of allergic contact dermatitis by patch test versus reflectance confocal laser microscopy, with nickel and cobalt.
Sakanashi EN; Matsumura M; Kikuchi K; Ikeda M; Miura H
Eur J Dermatol; 2010; 20(6):705-11. PubMed ID: 20822971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Contact sensitivity to hair dyes can be detected by the consumer open test.
Krasteva M; Cristaudo A; Hall B; Orton D; Rudzki E; Santucci B; Toutain H; Wilkinson J
Eur J Dermatol; 2002; 12(4):322-6. PubMed ID: 12095875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Strong allergic patch test reactions may indicate a general disposition for contact allergy.
Brasch J; Schnuch A; Uter W;
Allergy; 2006 Mar; 61(3):364-9. PubMed ID: 16436147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Clinically relevant contact allergy to formaldehyde may be missed by testing with formaldehyde 1·0%.
Hauksson I; Pontén A; Gruvberger B; Isaksson M; Bruze M
Br J Dermatol; 2011 Mar; 164(3):568-72. PubMed ID: 21114477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Systemic contact dermatitis due to nickel from an intravenous catheter].
Grange-Prunier A; Frances C; Badet B; Henry S; Bernard P
Ann Dermatol Venereol; 2008 Nov; 135(11):743-7. PubMed ID: 19061652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Evaluation of contact dermatitis using the TRUE patch test.
Wright RW
J Ark Med Soc; 1991 Nov; 88(6):271-2. PubMed ID: 1800484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Late reactions to the patch-test preparations para-phenylenediamine and epoxy resin: a prospective multicentre investigation of the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group.
Hillen U; Jappe U; Frosch PJ; Becker D; Brasch J; Lilie M; Fuchs T; Kreft B; Pirker C; Geier J;
Br J Dermatol; 2006 Apr; 154(4):665-70. PubMed ID: 16536809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
