BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21332805)

  • 41. Histologic aspects of patch test reactions in allergic contact dermatitis.
    Rantuccio F; Sinisi D; Scardigno A; Conte A
    Contact Dermatitis; 1978 Dec; 4(6):338-42. PubMed ID: 738038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. 1,2-Ethanedithiol-induced erythema multiforme-like contact dermatitis.
    Tjiu JW; Chu CY; Sun CC
    Acta Derm Venereol; 2004; 84(5):393-6. PubMed ID: 15370708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. [Erythema multiforme caused by Amphosept contact].
    Pruvost F; Estève E; Vaillant L; De Muret A; Machet MC; Lorette G
    Ann Dermatol Venereol; 1993; 120(11):835-7. PubMed ID: 8210137
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Patch testing with benzoyl peroxide: reaction profile and interpretation of positive patch test reactions.
    Ockenfels HM; Uter W; Lessmann H; Schnuch A; Geier J
    Contact Dermatitis; 2009 Oct; 61(4):209-16. PubMed ID: 19825092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Cumulative skin irritation test of sanitary pads in sensitive skin and normal skin population.
    Farage MA; Maibach H
    Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2007; 26(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 17464747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Pustular patch test reactions in atopic dermatitis.
    Uehara M; Takahashi C; Ofuji S
    Arch Dermatol; 1975 Sep; 111(9):1154-7. PubMed ID: 1167047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Airborne contact dermatitis due to Japanese cedar pollen.
    Yokozeki H; Satoh T; Katayama I; Nishioka K
    Contact Dermatitis; 2007 Apr; 56(4):224-8. PubMed ID: 17343624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Macro-video documentation patch tests.
    Schuster C; Kränke B; Szolar-Platzer C; Aberer W
    Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Apr; 52(4):177-83. PubMed ID: 15859988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Clinical assessment of rosacea severity: oriental score vs. quantitative assessment method with imaging and biomedical tools.
    Kim J; Ahn JW; Ha S; Kwon SH; Lee O; Oh C
    Skin Res Technol; 2017 May; 23(2):186-193. PubMed ID: 27514310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Erythema-index of clinical patch test reactions.
    Jemec GB; Johansen JD
    Skin Res Technol; 1995 Feb; 1(1):26-9. PubMed ID: 27328218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Digital image analysis of facial erythema over time in persons with varied skin pigmentation.
    Whitmer K; Barford B; Turner M; Sullivan D; Sommers M
    Skin Res Technol; 2011 Aug; 17(3):348-52. PubMed ID: 21342293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Lack of sensitization for trimellitate, phthalate, terephthalate and isobutyrate plasticizers in a human repeated insult patch test.
    David RM; Lockhart LK; Ruble KM
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2003 Apr; 41(4):589-93. PubMed ID: 12615132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Contact dermatitis caused by dimethylfumarate in Argentina.
    Lo Balbo A; Gotelli MJ; Mac Cormack WP; Kogan N; Gotelli C
    Clin Toxicol (Phila); 2011 Jul; 49(6):508-9. PubMed ID: 21761960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Irritant contact dermatitis after use of Bispectral Index sensor in prone position.
    Pousman RM; Eilers WA; Johns B; Jung H
    Anesth Analg; 2002 Nov; 95(5):1337-8, table of contents. PubMed ID: 12401622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The erythema Q-score, an imaging biomarker for redness in skin inflammation.
    Frew J; Penzi L; Suarez-Farinas M; Garcet S; Brunner PM; Czarnowicki T; Kim J; Bottomley C; Finney R; Cueto I; Fuentes-Duculan J; Ohmatsu H; Lentini T; Yanofsky V; Krueger JG; Guttman-Yassky E; Gareau D
    Exp Dermatol; 2021 Mar; 30(3):377-383. PubMed ID: 33113259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. The use of facial modeling and analysis to objectively quantify facial redness.
    Foolad N; Prakash N; Shi VY; Kamangar F; Wang Q; Li CS; Sivamani RK
    J Cosmet Dermatol; 2016 Mar; 15(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 26534767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Correcting for possible tissue distortion between provocation and assessment in skin testing: the divergent beam UVB photo-test.
    O'Doherty J; Henricson J; Falk M; Anderson CD
    Skin Res Technol; 2013 Nov; 19(4):368-74. PubMed ID: 23551145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Quantification of patch test reactions by transcutaneous PO2 measurement.
    Prens EP; van Joost T; Steketee J
    Contact Dermatitis; 1987 Mar; 16(3):142-6. PubMed ID: 3581821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Iodides and bromides.
    Burnett JW
    Cutis; 1989 Feb; 43(2):130. PubMed ID: 2702853
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Colorimetric quantification of erythema in the guinea pig maximization test.
    Rohold AE; Nielsen GD; Andersen KE
    Contact Dermatitis; 1991 May; 24(5):373-4. PubMed ID: 1893690
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.