BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2133339)

  • 1. Use of the integral implant for overdenture stabilization.
    Block MS; Kent JN; Finger IM
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1990; 5(2):140-7. PubMed ID: 2133339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Tissue-supported implant overdentures.
    Guerra LR; Finger IM; Block MS
    Implant Dent; 1992; 1(1):69-77. PubMed ID: 1288799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Retention of maxillary implant overdenture bars of different designs.
    Williams BH; Ochiai KT; Hojo S; Nishimura R; Caputo AA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Dec; 86(6):603-7. PubMed ID: 11753311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Orientation of retentive matrices on spherical attachments independent of implant parallelism.
    Wiemeyer AS; Agar JR; Kazemi RB
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Oct; 86(4):434-7. PubMed ID: 11677540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Maximum dislodging forces of implant overdenture stud attachments.
    Petropoulos VC; Smith W
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(4):526-35. PubMed ID: 12182295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The influence of interimplant distance and attachment type on the retention characteristics of mandibular overdentures on 2 implants: initial retention values.
    Michelinakis G; Barclay CW; Smith PW
    Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(5):507-12. PubMed ID: 17323731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A non-parallel implant overdenture.
    Portnoy LL
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 1995 Aug; 23(8):73-6. PubMed ID: 9052017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A randomized clinical trial comparing two mandibular implant overdenture designs: 3-year prosthetic outcomes using a six-field protocol.
    Walton JN
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(3):255-60. PubMed ID: 12854788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The in vitro effect of different implant angulations and cyclic dislodgement on the retentive properties of an overdenture attachment system.
    Al-Ghafli SA; Michalakis KX; Hirayama H; Kang K
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Sep; 102(3):140-7. PubMed ID: 19703620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Attachment use for abutment supported prostheses.
    Mentag PJ; Kosinski TF
    Dent Today; 1990 Sep; 9(7):52-3. PubMed ID: 2132098
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Retention forces of spherical attachments as a function of implant and matrix angulation in mandibular overdentures: an in vitro study.
    Ortegón SM; Thompson GA; Agar JR; Taylor TD; Perdikis D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Apr; 101(4):231-8. PubMed ID: 19328276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Retrofitting implant overdenture attachments: a clinical report.
    Simon H
    J Prosthodont; 2003 Jun; 12(2):138-42. PubMed ID: 12964687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prosthetic solution for unfavorably inclined maxillary implants: a case report.
    Uludag B; Celik G; Goktug G
    J Oral Implantol; 2008; 34(2):111-4. PubMed ID: 18478907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dental rehabilitation using an implant-carrying plate system in a severely resorbed edentulous maxilla: a case report.
    Kurita H; Sakai H; Uehara S; Kurashina K
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(1):117-20. PubMed ID: 18416420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Overdenture retention and stabilization with ball-and-socket attachments: principles and technique.
    Banton B; Henry MD
    J Dent Technol; 1997 Sep; 14(7):14-20. PubMed ID: 9524489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A simple, predictable intraoral technique for retentive mechanism attachment of implant overdenture attachments.
    Daher T
    J Prosthodont; 2003 Sep; 12(3):202-5. PubMed ID: 14508743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Simplifying divergence challenges of a combination root and implant overdenture attachment case.
    Schneider AL
    Dent Today; 2006 Nov; 25(11):96, 98. PubMed ID: 17128710
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of retention and release periods for implant overdenture attachments.
    Petropoulos VC; Smith W; Kousvelari E
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(2):176-85. PubMed ID: 9109267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of implant angulation upon retention of overdenture attachments.
    Gulizio MP; Agar JR; Kelly JR; Taylor TD
    J Prosthodont; 2005 Mar; 14(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 15733129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Solutions for severely angulated implants in the mandibular overdenture: a clinical report.
    Akkad S; Richards M
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Jun; 18(4):342-7. PubMed ID: 19054301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.