These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21333875)

  • 1. Estimation of effective lens position using a method independent of preoperative keratometry readings.
    Dooley I; Charalampidou S; Nolan J; Loughman J; Molloy L; Beatty S
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2011 Mar; 37(3):506-12. PubMed ID: 21333875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Anterior chamber depth, intraocular lens position, and refractive outcomes after cataract surgery.
    Engren AL; Behndig A
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Apr; 39(4):572-7. PubMed ID: 23395354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Scheimpflug photography keratometry readings for routine intraocular lens power calculation.
    Shammas HJ; Hoffer KJ; Shammas MC
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Feb; 35(2):330-4. PubMed ID: 19185251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ultrasound biometry vs. IOL Master.
    Roy A; Das S; Sahu SK; Rath S
    Ophthalmology; 2012 Sep; 119(9):1937.e1-2. PubMed ID: 22944497
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of toric intraocular lenses and peripheral corneal relaxing incisions to treat astigmatism during cataract surgery.
    Mingo-Botín D; Muñoz-Negrete FJ; Won Kim HR; Morcillo-Laiz R; Rebolleda G; Oblanca N
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 Oct; 36(10):1700-8. PubMed ID: 20870116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Anterior chamber parameters measured using the Pentacam Scheimpflug imaging device before and after cataract surgery in eyes with primary angle closure.
    Omura T; Tanito M; Doi R; Ishida R; Ohira A
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2012 Dec; 90(8):e654-5. PubMed ID: 22937745
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Analysis of nonlinear systems to estimate intraocular lens position after cataract surgery.
    Findl O; Struhal W; Dorffner G; Drexler W
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Apr; 30(4):863-6. PubMed ID: 15093652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Intraocular lens stability and refractive outcomes after cataract surgery using primary posterior continuous curvilinear capsulorrhexis.
    Kim KH; Kim WS
    Ophthalmology; 2010 Dec; 117(12):2278-86. PubMed ID: 20561685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pupil size and Scheimpflug Holladay equivalent keratometry readings.
    Lam S
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 Jan; 36(1):184; author reply 184. PubMed ID: 20117731
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. IOL power calculations.
    Haigis W
    Ophthalmology; 2010 Feb; 117(2):400-1; author reply 401. PubMed ID: 20141858
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Anterior chamber depth and change in axial intraocular lens position after cataract surgery with primary posterior capsulorhexis and posterior optic buttonholing.
    Stifter E; Menapace R; Luksch A; Neumayer T; Sacu S
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 May; 34(5):749-54. PubMed ID: 18471628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Analysis of changes of anterior chamber depth after IOL implantation].
    Tang P; Zhang HY; Wang H
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2006 Jan; 42(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 16638278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of intraocular lens power calculation by the IOLMaster in phakic and eyes with hydrophobic acrylic lenses.
    Chang SW; Yu CY; Chen DP
    Ophthalmology; 2009 Jul; 116(7):1336-42. PubMed ID: 19427697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Rotational stability of a single-piece toric acrylic intraocular lens.
    Koshy JJ; Nishi Y; Hirnschall N; Crnej A; Gangwani V; Maurino V; Findl O
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 Oct; 36(10):1665-70. PubMed ID: 20870111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prediction error after pediatric cataract surgery with intraocular lens implantation: Contact versus immersion A-scan biometry.
    Trivedi RH; Wilson ME
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2011 Mar; 37(3):501-5. PubMed ID: 21333874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accuracy of Scheimpflug Holladay equivalent keratometry readings after corneal refractive surgery.
    Holladay JT
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 Jan; 36(1):182-3; author reply 183-4. PubMed ID: 20117729
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Predicting postoperative astigmatism using Scheimpflug keratometry (Pentacam) and automated keratometry (IOLMaster).
    Yong Park C; Do JR; Chuck RS
    Curr Eye Res; 2012 Dec; 37(12):1091-8. PubMed ID: 22916682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Intraoperative optical refractive biometry for intraocular lens power estimation without axial length and keratometry measurements.
    Ianchulev T; Salz J; Hoffer K; Albini T; Hsu H; Labree L
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 Aug; 31(8):1530-6. PubMed ID: 16129287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Early changes of keratometry after cataract surgery].
    Basca M; Pavel L; Boboc N; Melnic O; Neagu I
    Oftalmologia; 2009; 53(1):89-94. PubMed ID: 19569611
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Changes in anterior chamber depth and intraocular pressure after phacoemulsification in eyes with occludable angles.
    Shin HC; Subrayan V; Tajunisah I
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 Aug; 36(8):1289-95. PubMed ID: 20656150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.