These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21333960)

  • 1. Distraction by irrelevant sound during foreperiods selectively impairs temporal preparation.
    Steinborn MB; Langner R
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Mar; 136(3):405-18. PubMed ID: 21333960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dynamic adjustment of temporal preparation: shifting warning signal modality attenuates the sequential foreperiod effect.
    Steinborn MB; Rolke B; Bratzke D; Ulrich R
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 Sep; 132(1):40-7. PubMed ID: 19576562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The modality shift effect and the effectiveness of warning signals in different modalities.
    Rodway P
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2005 Oct; 120(2):199-226. PubMed ID: 15993828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mental fatigue and temporal preparation in simple reaction-time performance.
    Langner R; Steinborn MB; Chatterjee A; Sturm W; Willmes K
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Jan; 133(1):64-72. PubMed ID: 19878913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of a cross-trial shift of auditory warning signals on the sequential foreperiod effect.
    Steinborn MB; Rolke B; Bratzke D; Ulrich R
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 May; 134(1):94-104. PubMed ID: 20096395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Differences in the neural basis of automatic auditory and visual time perception: ERP evidence from an across-modal delayed response oddball task.
    Chen Y; Huang X; Luo Y; Peng C; Liu C
    Brain Res; 2010 Apr; 1325():100-11. PubMed ID: 20170647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sequential effects within a short foreperiod context: evidence for the conditioning account of temporal preparation.
    Steinborn MB; Rolke B; Bratzke D; Ulrich R
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Oct; 129(2):297-307. PubMed ID: 18804193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Arousal modulates temporal preparation under increased time uncertainty: Evidence from higher-order sequential foreperiod effects.
    Steinborn MB; Langner R
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2012 Jan; 139(1):65-76. PubMed ID: 22088963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The role of preparation and cue-modality in crossmodal task switching.
    Lukas S; Philipp AM; Koch I
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Jul; 134(3):318-22. PubMed ID: 20398881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Temporal attention shortens perceptual latency: a temporal prior entry effect.
    Seibold VC; Fiedler A; Rolke B
    Psychophysiology; 2011 May; 48(5):708-17. PubMed ID: 20883507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The time-course of auditory and visual distraction effects in a new crossmodal paradigm.
    Bendixen A; Grimm S; Deouell LY; Wetzel N; Mädebach A; Schröger E
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jun; 48(7):2130-9. PubMed ID: 20385149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Top-down feature-based selection of matching features for audio-visual synchrony discrimination.
    Fujisaki W; Nishida S
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Mar; 433(3):225-30. PubMed ID: 18281153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The role of sensory modality in age-related distraction: a critical review and a renewed view.
    Guerreiro MJ; Murphy DR; Van Gerven PW
    Psychol Bull; 2010 Nov; 136(6):975-1022. PubMed ID: 21038938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Time course of auditory masker effects: tapping the locus of audiovisual integration?
    Steenken R; Diederich A; Colonius H
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Apr; 435(1):78-83. PubMed ID: 18355963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Visual and auditory alertness: modality-specific and supramodal neural mechanisms and their modulation by nicotine.
    Thiel CM; Fink GR
    J Neurophysiol; 2007 Apr; 97(4):2758-68. PubMed ID: 17287445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of age on involuntary capture of attention by irrelevant sounds: a test of the frontal hypothesis of aging.
    Andrés P; Parmentier FB; Escera C
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(12):2564-8. PubMed ID: 16797613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of sound location on visual task performance and electrophysiological measures of distraction.
    Corral MJ; Escera C
    Neuroreport; 2008 Oct; 19(15):1535-9. PubMed ID: 18797312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Neural basis of auditory-induced shifts in visual time-order perception.
    McDonald JJ; Teder-Sälejärvi WA; Di Russo F; Hillyard SA
    Nat Neurosci; 2005 Sep; 8(9):1197-202. PubMed ID: 16056224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Active listening impairs visual perception and selectivity: an ERP study of auditory dual-task costs on visual attention.
    Gherri E; Eimer M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Apr; 23(4):832-44. PubMed ID: 20465407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cross-modal interactions in time and space: auditory influence on visual attention in hemispatial neglect.
    Van Vleet TM; Robertson LC
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Aug; 18(8):1368-79. PubMed ID: 16859421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.