These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21334606)

  • 21. Category-specificity in visual object recognition.
    Gerlach C
    Cognition; 2009 Jun; 111(3):281-301. PubMed ID: 19324331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Are visual stimuli sufficient to evoke motor information? Studies with hand primes.
    Borghi AM; Bonfiglioli C; Lugli L; Ricciardelli P; Rubichi S; Nicoletti R
    Neurosci Lett; 2007 Jan; 411(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 17052839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Combining feature- and correspondence-based methods for visual object recognition.
    Westphal G; Würtz RP
    Neural Comput; 2009 Jul; 21(7):1952-89. PubMed ID: 19292649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Visual object representations can be formed outside the focus of voluntary attention: evidence from event-related brain potentials.
    Müller D; Winkler I; Roeber U; Schaffer S; Czigler I; Schröger E
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Jun; 22(6):1179-88. PubMed ID: 19445610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Domain knowledge moderates the influence of visual saliency in scene recognition.
    Humphrey K; Underwood G
    Br J Psychol; 2009 May; 100(Pt 2):377-98. PubMed ID: 18822185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Selecting and ignoring salient objects within and across dimensions in visual search.
    Schubö A; Müller HJ
    Brain Res; 2009 Aug; 1283():84-101. PubMed ID: 19501066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Generalization of feature- and rule-based learning in the categorization of dimensional stimuli: evidence for dual processes under cognitive control.
    Natal SD; McLaren IP; Livesey EJ
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2013 Apr; 39(2):140-51. PubMed ID: 23421398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Gender differences in brain activation during encoding and recognition of male and female faces.
    Ino T; Nakai R; Azuma T; Kimura T; Fukuyama H
    Brain Imaging Behav; 2010 Mar; 4(1):55-67. PubMed ID: 20503114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Context-dependent repetition effects on recognition memory.
    Opitz B
    Brain Cogn; 2010 Jul; 73(2):110-8. PubMed ID: 20493623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Non-holistic coding of objects in lateral occipital complex with and without attention.
    Guggenmos M; Thoma V; Cichy RM; Haynes JD; Sterzer P; Richardson-Klavehn A
    Neuroimage; 2015 Feb; 107():356-363. PubMed ID: 25512039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Constraints on view combination: effects of self-occlusion and differences among familiar and novel views.
    Wong AC; Hayward WG
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Feb; 31(1):110-21. PubMed ID: 15709867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Has the butcher on the bus dyed his hair? When color changes modulate ERP correlates of familiarity and recollection.
    Groh-Bordin C; Zimmer HD; Ecker UK
    Neuroimage; 2006 Oct; 32(4):1879-90. PubMed ID: 16777433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Perirhinal and hippocampal contributions to visual recognition memory can be distinguished from those of occipito-temporal structures based on conscious awareness of prior occurrence.
    Danckert SL; Gati JS; Menon RS; Köhler S
    Hippocampus; 2007; 17(11):1081-92. PubMed ID: 17696171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Visual statistical learning based on the perceptual and semantic information of objects.
    Otsuka S; Nishiyama M; Nakahara F; Kawaguchi J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Jan; 39(1):196-207. PubMed ID: 22686848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Semantic categorization precedes affective evaluation of visual scenes.
    Nummenmaa L; Hyönä J; Calvo MG
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2010 May; 139(2):222-46. PubMed ID: 20438250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Describing scenes hardly seen.
    Dobel C; Gumnior H; Bölte J; Zwitserlood P
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2007 Jun; 125(2):129-43. PubMed ID: 16934737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The effect of visual context on the identification of ambiguous environmental sounds.
    Ozcan E; van Egmond R
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 Jun; 131(2):110-9. PubMed ID: 19403108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Intrinsic generalization analysis of low dimensional representations.
    Liu X; Srivastava A; Wang D
    Neural Netw; 2003; 16(5-6):537-45. PubMed ID: 12850005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Association of impaired facial affect recognition with basic facial and visual processing deficits in schizophrenia.
    Norton D; McBain R; Holt DJ; Ongur D; Chen Y
    Biol Psychiatry; 2009 Jun; 65(12):1094-8. PubMed ID: 19268917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. N250 ERP correlates of the acquisition of face representations across different images.
    Kaufmann JM; Schweinberger SR; Burton AM
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Apr; 21(4):625-41. PubMed ID: 18702593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.