These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

263 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21335102)

  • 1. An empirical approach to model selection through validation for censored survival data.
    Choi I; Wells BJ; Yu C; Kattan MW
    J Biomed Inform; 2011 Aug; 44(4):595-606. PubMed ID: 21335102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A machine learning-based approach to prognostic analysis of thoracic transplantations.
    Delen D; Oztekin A; Kong ZJ
    Artif Intell Med; 2010 May; 49(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 20153956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Simplifying a prognostic model: a simulation study based on clinical data.
    Ambler G; Brady AR; Royston P
    Stat Med; 2002 Dec; 21(24):3803-22. PubMed ID: 12483768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Support vector methods for survival analysis: a comparison between ranking and regression approaches.
    Van Belle V; Pelckmans K; Van Huffel S; Suykens JA
    Artif Intell Med; 2011 Oct; 53(2):107-18. PubMed ID: 21821401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Logical analysis of survival data: prognostic survival models by detecting high-degree interactions in right-censored data.
    Kronek LP; Reddy A
    Bioinformatics; 2008 Aug; 24(16):i248-53. PubMed ID: 18689833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Construction and validation of a prognostic model across several studies, with an application in superficial bladder cancer.
    Royston P; Parmar MK; Sylvester R
    Stat Med; 2004 Mar; 23(6):907-26. PubMed ID: 15027080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Penalized Cox regression analysis in the high-dimensional and low-sample size settings, with applications to microarray gene expression data.
    Gui J; Li H
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Jul; 21(13):3001-8. PubMed ID: 15814556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Nonlinear discriminant analysis and prognostic factor classification in node-negative primary breast cancer using probabilistic neural networks.
    Le Goff JM; Lavayssière L; Rouëssé J; Spyratos F
    Anticancer Res; 2000; 20(3B):2213-8. PubMed ID: 10928180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biostatistical modeling using traditional preoperative and pathological prognostic variables in the selection of men at high risk for disease recurrence after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.
    Bauer JJ; Connelly RR; Seterhenn IA; Deausen J; Srivastava S; McLeod DG; Moul JW
    J Urol; 1998 Mar; 159(3):929-33. PubMed ID: 9474185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mixture classification model based on clinical markers for breast cancer prognosis.
    Zeng T; Liu J
    Artif Intell Med; 2010; 48(2-3):129-37. PubMed ID: 20005686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A simulation study of cross-validation for selecting an optimal cutpoint in univariate survival analysis.
    Faraggi D; Simon R
    Stat Med; 1996 Oct; 15(20):2203-13. PubMed ID: 8910964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The cross-validated AUC for MCP-logistic regression with high-dimensional data.
    Jiang D; Huang J; Zhang Y
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2013 Oct; 22(5):505-18. PubMed ID: 22127580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of preoperative prostate specific antigen density and prostate specific antigen for predicting recurrence after radical prostatectomy: results from the search data base.
    Freedland SJ; Kane CJ; Presti JC; Terris MK; Amling CL; Dorey F; Aronson WJ
    J Urol; 2003 Mar; 169(3):969-73. PubMed ID: 12576824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prediction of an outcome using trajectories estimated from a linear mixed model.
    Maruyama N; Takahashi F; Takeuchi M
    J Biopharm Stat; 2009 Sep; 19(5):779-90. PubMed ID: 20183443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Training artificial neural networks directly on the concordance index for censored data using genetic algorithms.
    Kalderstam J; Edén P; Bendahl PO; Strand C; Fernö M; Ohlsson M
    Artif Intell Med; 2013 Jun; 58(2):125-32. PubMed ID: 23582884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Performance comparison between Logistic regression, decision trees, and multilayer perceptron in predicting peripheral neuropathy in type 2 diabetes mellitus.
    Li CP; Zhi XY; Ma J; Cui Z; Zhu ZL; Zhang C; Hu LP
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2012 Mar; 125(5):851-7. PubMed ID: 22490586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Development and validation of a novel prognostic scoring model for ischemic colitis.
    Chung JW; Cheon JH; Park JJ; Jung ES; Choi EH; Kim H
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2010 Sep; 53(9):1287-94. PubMed ID: 20706072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. High-dimensional Cox models: the choice of penalty as part of the model building process.
    Benner A; Zucknick M; Hielscher T; Ittrich C; Mansmann U
    Biom J; 2010 Feb; 52(1):50-69. PubMed ID: 20166132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Predicting three-year kidney graft survival in recipients with systemic lupus erythematosus.
    Tang H; Poynton MR; Hurdle JF; Baird BC; Koford JK; Goldfarb-Rumyantzev AS
    ASAIO J; 2011; 57(4):300-9. PubMed ID: 21701272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of predictive accuracy of four prognostic models for nonmetastatic renal cell carcinoma after nephrectomy: a multicenter European study.
    Cindolo L; Patard JJ; Chiodini P; Schips L; Ficarra V; Tostain J; de La Taille A; Altieri V; Lobel B; Zigeuner RE; Artibani W; Guillé F; Abbou CC; Salzano L; Gallo C
    Cancer; 2005 Oct; 104(7):1362-71. PubMed ID: 16116599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.