These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21335333)

  • 21. Comparison of screen-film and full-field digital mammography in Japanese population-based screening.
    Yamada T; Saito M; Ishibashi T; Tsuboi M; Matsuhashi T; Sato A; Saito H; Takahashi S; Onuki K; Ouchi N
    Radiat Med; 2004; 22(6):408-12. PubMed ID: 15648457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Mammographic performance in a population-based screening program: before, during, and after the transition from screen-film to full-field digital mammography.
    Hofvind S; Skaane P; Elmore JG; Sebuødegård S; Hoff SR; Lee CI
    Radiology; 2014 Jul; 272(1):52-62. PubMed ID: 24689858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Screening outcome in women repeatedly recalled for the same mammographic abnormality before, during and after the transition from screen-film to full-field digital screening mammography.
    van Bommel R; Voogd AC; Louwman MW; Strobbe LJ; Venderink D; Duijm LE
    Eur Radiol; 2017 Feb; 27(2):553-561. PubMed ID: 27180183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Is full-field digital mammography more accurate than screen-film mammography in overall population screening? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Souza FH; Wendland EM; Rosa MI; Polanczyk CA
    Breast; 2013 Jun; 22(3):217-24. PubMed ID: 23489759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Radiation doses received in the United Kingdom breast screening programme in 2010 to 2012.
    Young KC; Oduko JM
    Br J Radiol; 2016; 89(1058):20150831. PubMed ID: 26654386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Full-field digital mammography compared to screen film mammography in the prevalent round of a population-based screening programme: the Vestfold County Study.
    Vigeland E; Klaasen H; Klingen TA; Hofvind S; Skaane P
    Eur Radiol; 2008 Jan; 18(1):183-91. PubMed ID: 17680246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Digital compared with screen-film mammography: performance measures in concurrent cohorts within an organized breast screening program.
    Chiarelli AM; Edwards SA; Prummel MV; Muradali D; Majpruz V; Done SJ; Brown P; Shumak RS; Yaffe MJ
    Radiology; 2013 Sep; 268(3):684-93. PubMed ID: 23674784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Mammography radiation dose: initial results from Serbia based on mean glandular dose assessment for phantoms and patients.
    Ciraj-Bjelac O; Beciric S; Arandjic D; Kosutic D; Kovacevic M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010 Jun; 140(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 20159918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of full-field digital mammography with screen-film mammography for cancer detection: results of 4,945 paired examinations.
    Lewin JM; Hendrick RE; D'Orsi CJ; Isaacs PK; Moss LJ; Karellas A; Sisney GA; Kuni CC; Cutter GR
    Radiology; 2001 Mar; 218(3):873-80. PubMed ID: 11230669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of reading time between screen-film mammography and soft-copied, full-field digital mammography.
    Ishiyama M; Tsunoda-Shimizu H; Kikuchi M; Saida Y; Hiramatsu S
    Breast Cancer; 2009; 16(1):58-61. PubMed ID: 18836795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Interval breast cancer characteristics before, during and after the transition from screen-film to full-field digital screening mammography.
    van Bommel RMG; Weber R; Voogd AC; Nederend J; Louwman MWJ; Venderink D; Strobbe LJA; Rutten MJC; Plaisier ML; Lohle PN; Hooijen MJH; Tjan-Heijnen VCG; Duijm LEM
    BMC Cancer; 2017 May; 17(1):315. PubMed ID: 28476109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Average glandular dose in digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis.
    Olgar T; Kahn T; Gosch D
    Rofo; 2012 Oct; 184(10):911-8. PubMed ID: 22711250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Screening outcome and surgical treatment during and after the transition from screen-film to digital screening mammography in the south of The Netherlands.
    Weber RJ; Nederend J; Voogd AC; Strobbe LJ; Duijm LE
    Int J Cancer; 2015 Jul; 137(1):135-43. PubMed ID: 25418512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Digital mammography in a screening programme and its implications for pathology: a comparative study.
    Feeley L; Kiernan D; Mooney T; Flanagan F; Hargaden G; Kell M; Stokes M; Kennedy M
    J Clin Pathol; 2011 Mar; 64(3):215-9. PubMed ID: 21177749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Patient dose in digital mammography.
    Chevalier M; Morán P; Ten JI; Fernández Soto JM; Cepeda T; Vañó E
    Med Phys; 2004 Sep; 31(9):2471-9. PubMed ID: 15487727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Radiation doses received in the UK Breast Screening Programme in 1997 and 1998.
    Young KC; Burch A
    Br J Radiol; 2000 Mar; 73(867):278-87. PubMed ID: 10817044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Radiation dose evaluation in a photon-counting digital mammography unit].
    Matsubara K; Matsumoto C; Mochiya Y; Toda K; Noto K; Koshida K
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2014 May; 70(5):445-52. PubMed ID: 24858289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Impact of the transition from screen-film to digital screening mammography on interval cancer characteristics and treatment - a population based study from the Netherlands.
    Nederend J; Duijm LE; Louwman MW; Coebergh JW; Roumen RM; Lohle PN; Roukema JA; Rutten MJ; van Steenbergen LN; Ernst MF; Jansen FH; Plaisier ML; Hooijen MJ; Voogd AC
    Eur J Cancer; 2014 Jan; 50(1):31-9. PubMed ID: 24275518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Impact of full field digital mammography on the classification and mammographic characteristics of interval breast cancers.
    Knox M; O'Brien A; Szabó E; Smith CS; Fenlon HM; McNicholas MM; Flanagan FL
    Eur J Radiol; 2015 Jun; 84(6):1056-61. PubMed ID: 25816990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Radiation exposure of digital breast tomosynthesis using an antiscatter grid compared with full-field digital mammography.
    Paulis LE; Lobbes MB; Lalji UC; Gelissen N; Bouwman RW; Wildberger JE; Jeukens CR
    Invest Radiol; 2015 Oct; 50(10):679-85. PubMed ID: 26011823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.